Managing & re-using didactical expertise: The Didactical Object Model

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 84-96

  Pawlowski, Jan M ^a   Bick, Markus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b EBS BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Didactical Expertise; Didactical Object Model; Educational Modeling Languages; Integrated Knowledge and Learning Management; Learning Design

Indexed keywords

EID: 32144436294     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adelsberger, H. H., Bick, M., Körner, F., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2001). Virtual Education in Business Information Systems (VAWI) - Facilitating collaborative development processes using the Essen Learning Model. Paper presented at the ICDE World Conference, April 1-5, 2001, Düsseldorf, Germany.
2. Adelsberger, H., Bick, M., Lodzinski, T., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2004). Electronic Performance Support Systems in Production and Operations Management - State of the Art and Future Development. Paper presented at the Second World Conference on POM and 15th Annual POM Conference, April 30 - May 3, 2004, Cancun, Mexico.
3. Allert, H., Dhraief, H., & Nejdl, W. (2002): How are Learning Objects Used in Learning Processes? Instructional Roles of Learning Objects in LOM. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.) Proceedings of EdMedia 2002, Norfolk VA, USA: AACE, 40-41.
4. Allert, H. (2004). Coherent Social Systems for Learning: An Approach for Contextualized and Community-Centred Metadata. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, retrieved October 25, 2005 from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/2/ allert-2004-2.pdf.
5. Benmahamed, D., Ermine, J.-L., & Tchounikine, P. (2005). From Mask KM Methodology to Learning Activities Described with IMS-LD. Paper presented at the WM2005: Professional Knowledge Management Experiences and Visions, April 10-13, 2005, Kaiserslautem, Germany.
6. Bergmann, R. (2002): Experience Management, Berlin: Springer.
7. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., & Stal, M. (1996). A System of Patterns - Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, New York, USA: John Wiley.
8. Brusilovsky, P., & Nijhawan, H. (2002). A Framework for Adaptive E-Learning Based on Distributed Re-usable Learning Activities. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning, October 15-19, 2002, Montreal, Canada.
9. CEN/ISSS (2002). Learning Technologies Workshop; Survey of Educational Modelling Languages (EMLs), Version 1, retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://www.cenorm.be/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/isss/activity/ emlsurveyv1.pdf.
10. Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN e.V.) (2004). Aus- und Weiterbildung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von e-Learning - Teil 2: Didaktisches Objektmodell - Modellierung und Beschreibung didaktischer Szenarien [Learning, Education and Training focussing on e-Learning - Part 2: Didactic Objects Model - Modelling and Description of Scenarios for Learning, Education and Training], Berlin: Beuth.
11. nd Edition Overview, retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://www.adlnet.org/downloads/70. cfm.
12. Drucker, P. F. (1994). Post-Capitalist Society, New York, USA: Harper Business.
13. Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 40 (3), 265-276.
14. Firesmith, D., & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2001). The OPEN Process Framework, Amsterdam: Addison-Wesley Longman.
15. Friesen, N. (2002). Semantic Interoperability and Communities of Practice. In: Mason, J. (Ed.), Global Summit of Online Learning Networks: Papers, Adelaide: Educationau, 104-107.
16. Gaede, B. (2000). Die Instructional Material Description Language und das Produktionssystem für interaktive Lernsoftware ProfiL [The Instructional Material Description Language and the production system for interactive learning software ProfiL], Hamburg: Arbeitstreffen der GI-Fachgruppe Intelligente Lehr/Lemsysteme.
17. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns - Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, New York: Addison-Wesley.
18. Grey, G. (1991). Electronic Performance Support Systems, Boston, MA, USA: Weingarten Publications.
19. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(3-4), 106-116.
20. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (2002). Learning Object Metadata Standard, IEEE 1484.12.1-2002, retrieved October 25, 2005 from http://ltsc.ieee.org/.
21. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1990). IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries, New York, NY, USA.
22. Jacobson, I., Griss, M., & Jonsson, P. (1997). Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success, New York: Addison-Wesley.
23. The Joint Information Systems Committee - JISC (2005). E-Learning in Practice Cases Studies, retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://blackboard.sihe. ac.uk/support/jisc/html/casestudies.htm.
24. th International World Wide Web Conference, May 10-14, 2005, Chiba, Japan.
25. Klebl, M. (2005). Educational Interoperability Standards: IMS Learning Design and DIN Didactical Object Model. In Ehlers, U.-D. & Pawlowski, J. M. (Eds.), European Handbook of Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning, Thessaloniki: CEDEFOP.
26. Koper, R. (2001). Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective - the pedagogical meta-model behind EML, retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/articles.htm.
27. Koper, R., & Manderveld, J. M. (2004). Educational modelling language: modelling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35 (5), 537-551.
28. Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7 (3), 97-111.
29. Koper, R., Olivier, B., & Anderson, T. (2002). IMS Learning Design Information Model, Version 1.0, retrieved October 12, 2005 from http://www.imsglobal.org/leamingdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_infov1p0.html.
30. Lehner, F. (2000). Organisational Memory, Munich: Hanser.
31. Levy, D. (2003). Creating a Change Management Knowledge Infrastructure. Information Management & Consulting, 18 (1), 12-16.
32. Littlejohn, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2003). Reusing Online Resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2003 (1), retrieved October 25, 2005 from http://www-jime.open.ac.Uk/2003/1/reuse-01.html.
33. Lugger, K., & Kraus, H. (2001). Mastering Human barriers in Knowledge Management. Journal of Universal Computer Science 7 (6), 488-497.
34. Maier, R. (2002). Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management, Berlin: Springer.
35. Maier, R., & Hädrich, T. (2001). Modell für die Erfolgsmessung von Wissensmanagementsystemen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 43 (5), 497-509.
36. Meder, N. (2001). Didaktische Ontologien [Didactical Ontologies], retrieved November 02, 2005 from http://cweb.uni-bielefeld.de/agbi/cgi-bin- noauth/cache/VAL_BLOB/167/167/63/did.pdf.
37. Netquest (2000). Tutorial Markup Language (TML), retrieved October 12, 2005 from http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/netquest/about/lang/.
38. Pawlowski, J. M. (2001). Das Essener-Lern-Modell (ELM): Ein Vorgehensmodell zur Entwicklung computerunterstützter Lernumgebungen, Dissertation, Essen, Germany: University of Essen.
39. Pawlowski, J. M. (2002). Reusable Models of Pedagogical Concepts - a Framework for Pedagogical and Content Design. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2002, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, June 24-29, 2002, Denver, CO, USA.
40. Pawlowski, J. M. (2005): Quality Initiative E-Learning in Germany: The Future of Learning Technology Standardization. Paper presented at the Second joint workshop on Cognition and Learning through Media-Communication for Advanced e-Learning 2005, September 28-30, 2005, Tokyo, Japan.
41. Probst, G., & Romhardt, K. (2000). Building Blocks of Knowledge Management - A Practical Approach, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Raybould, B. (1995). Performance Support Engineering: An Emerging Development Methodology for Enabling Organizational Learning. Performance & Improvement Quarterly, 8(1), 7-22.
43. Reeves, T. C., & Raven, A. (2001). Performance-Support Systems. In: Adelsberger, H. H., Collis, B., Pawlowski, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education & Training, Berlin: Springer, 93-112.
44. Reusable Learning (2004). Reusable Design Guidelines, Draft Version 3.1.1, retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://www.reusablelearning.org/docs/ guidelines/guidelines-v3.l.l.pdf.
45. Rodrfguez-Artacho, M., & Verdejo Maillo, M. F. (2004). Modeling Educational Content: The Cognitive Approach of the PALO Language. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 124-137.
46. Sicilia, M.-A., & Garcia, E. (2003). On the Concepts of Usability and Reusability of Learning Objects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, October 2003, retrieved October 25, 2005 from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/sicilia-garcia.html.
47. Smythe, C., & Jackl, A. (2004). IMS Content Packaging Information Model, Version 2.1.4., retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://www.imsproject. org/content/packaging/cpv1p1p4/imscp_infov1p1p4.html.
48. Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive selfawareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (2), 100-111.
49. Sridharan, B., & Kinshuk (2002). Knowledge Management and Reusability in Internet Based Learning. In Kinshuk, R. Lewis, K. Akahori, R. Kemp, T. Okamoto, L. Henderson & C.-H. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 1398-1399.
50. Swan, J. (2003). Knowledge Management in Action? In Holsapple, C. W. (Ed.), Handbook on Knowledge Management, Berlin: Springer, 271-296.
51. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 77, 27-43.
52. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning meaning and identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review, 2000 (Jan-Feb), 139-145.
54. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.