Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1165-1186

  Fitzgerald, Tracy S ^a,b   Prieve, Beth A ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Hearing assessment; Hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 31944450029     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/082)     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abdala, C. (1996). Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 3726-3740.
2. Allen, J. B., & Neely, S. T. (1992). Micromechanical models of the cochlea. Physics Today, 45, 40-47.
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1990). Guidelines for screening for hearing impairment and middle ear disorders. ASHA, 32(Suppl. 2), 17-24.
4. Boege, P., & Janssen, T. (2002). Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1810-1818.
5. Brown, A. M., Harris, F. P., & Beveridge, H. A. (1996). Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 3260-3267.
6. Brown, D. K., Bowman, D. M., & Kimberley, B. P. (2000). The effects of maturation and stimulus parameters on the optimal f2/f1 ratio of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in neonates. Hearing Research, 145, 17-24.
7. Brownell, W. E., Bader, C. R., Bertrand, D., & de Ribaupierre, Y. (1985, January 11). Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science, 227, 194-196.
8. Carvalho, S., Buki, B., Bonfils, P., & Avan, P. (2003). Effect of click intensity on click-evoked otoacoustic emission waveforms: Implications for the origin of emissions. Hearing Research, 175, 215-225.
9. Cooper, N. P., & Rhode, W. S. (1995). Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea pig cochlea. Hearing Research, 82, 225-243.
10. Cooper, N. P., & Rhode, W. S. (1998). Apical cochlear mechanics: A review of recent observations. In A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A. Q. Summerfield, & R. Meddis (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on "Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing" (pp. 11-18). London: Whirr.
11. de Boer, E. (1983). Wave reflection in passive and active cochlea models. In E. de Boer & M. A. Viergever (Eds.), Mechanics in hearing (pp. 135-142). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijoff.
12. Dorn, P. A., Piskorski, P., Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., & Keefe, D. H. (1999). Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Ear and Hearing, 20, 149-163.
13. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64.
14. Erminy, M., Avan, P., & Bonfils, P. (1998). Characteristics of the acoustic distortion product 2f2-f1 from the normal hearing ear. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 118, 32-36.
15. Fitzgerald, T. S., & Prieve, B. A. (1994). Comparison of click-evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds with psychophysical thresholds. Abstracts of the Seventeenth Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 47.
16. Gaskill, S. A., & Brown, A. M. (1990). The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 821-839.
17. Gaskill, S. A., & Brown, A. M. (1996). Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: Dual origin of 2f1-f2. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 3260-3274.
18. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Bergman, B. M., Beauchaine, K. L., Kaminski, J. R., Peters, J., & Jesteadt, W. (1993a). Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: Distortion product responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2050-2060.
19. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Bergman, B. M., Beauchaine, K. L., Kaminski, J. R., Peters, J., et al. (1993b). A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 2639-2648.
20. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., & Dorn, P. A. (1999). Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. Ear and Hearing, 20, 345-362.
21. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Dorn, P. A., & Hoover, B. M. (2003). Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 3275-3284.
22. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Ohlrich, B., Hoover, B., Redner, J., & Peters, J. (1997). From laboratory to clinic: A large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 18, 440-455.
23. Gorga, M. P., Nelson, K., Davis, T., Dorn, P. A., & Neely, S. T. (2000). Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2128-2135.
24. Gorga, M. P., Stover, L., Neely, S. T., & Montoya, D. (1996). The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 968-977.
25. Harris, F. P., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., Stagner, B. B., Coats, A. C., & Martin, G. K. (1989). Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 850, 220-229.
26. Harrison, W. A., & Norton, S. J. (1999). Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear and Hearing, 20, 75-86.
27. Hauser, R., & Probst, R. (1991). The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 280-286.
28. Hussain, D. M., Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Keefe, D. H., & Peters, J. (1998). Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 19, 434-449.
29. Janssen, T., Kummer, P., & Arnold, W. (1998). Growth behavior of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 3418-3430.
30. Kalluri, R., & Shera, C. A. (2001). Distortion-product source unmixing: A test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 622-637.
31. Kemp, D. T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1386-1391.
32. Kemp, D. T. (1986). Otoacoustic emissions, traveling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hearing Research, 22, 95-104.
33. Kemp, D. T. (1987). Otoacoustic emission characteristics during moderate continuous stimulation-intermodulation. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress of Acoustics.
34. Kemp, D. T., & Brown, A. M. (1983). An integrated view of cochlear mechanical nonlinearities observable from the ear canal. In E. de Boer & M. A. Viergever (Eds.), Mechanics of hearing (pp. 75-82). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
35. Kettembeil, S., Manley, G. A., & Siegl, E. (1995). Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anaesthesia sensitivity in the European starling and the chicken. Hearing Research, 86, 47-62.
36. Kim, D. O. (1980). Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustic observations. Hearing Research, 2, 297-317.
37. Kim, D. O., Molnar, C. E., & Matthews, J. W. (1980). Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1704-1721.
38. Kim, D. O., Paparello, J., Jung, M. D., Smurzynski, J., & Sun, X. (1996). Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: Performance regarding sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics. Acta Otolaryngologica, 116, 3-11.
39. Kimberley, B. P., Hernadi, I., Lee, A. M., & Brown, D. K. (1994). Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emissions and age. Ear and Hearing, 15, 199-209.
40. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent.
41. Knight, R. D., & Kemp, D. T. (1999a). f1, f2 area representations of DPOAEs indicate that the clinical 2f1-f2 DPOAE is an atypical form of OAE. British Journal of Audiology, 33, 87.
42. Knight, R. D., & Kemp, D. T. (1999b). Relationships between DPOAE and TEOAE amplitude and phase characteristics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1420-1435.
43. Knight, E. D., & Kemp, D. T. (2000). Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1, f2 area study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 457-473.
44. Knight, R. D., & Kemp, D. T. (2001). Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1513-1525.
45. Konrad-Martin, D., Neely, S. T., Keefe, D. H., Dorn, P. A., & Gorga, M. P. (2001). Sources of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2862-2879.
46. Lasky, R. E. (1998). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults: I. Frequency effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 981-991.
47. Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., Martin, G. K., Probst, R., & Coats, A. C. (1987). Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal: I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hearing Research, 28, 173-189.
48. Manley, G. A., Koppl, C., & Johnstone, B. M. (1993). Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard: I. General characteristics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2820-2833.
49. Martin, G. K., Jassir, D., Stagner, B. B., Whitehead M. L., & Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (1998). Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs. 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1957-1971.
50. Mauennann, M., Uppenkamp, S., van Hengel, P. W. J., & Kollmeier, B. (1999). Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans: II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3484-3491.
51. Metz, C. E., Herman, B. A., & Roe, C. A. (1998). Statistical comparison of two ROC curve estimates obtained from partially-paired data sets. Medical Decision Making, 18, 100-121.
52. Moulin, A. (2000a). Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude: I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1460-1470.
53. Moulin, A. (2000b). Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude: II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1471-1486.
54. Moulin, A., Bera, J. C., & Collet, L. (1994). Acoustic distortion products and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology, 33, 305-326.
55. Moulin, A., Collet, L., Veuillet, E., & Morgon, A. (1993). Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hearing Research, 65, 216-233.
56. Moulin, A., Jourdain, F., & Collet, L. (1999). Using acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in clinical applications: Influence of f2/f1 on DPOAEgram. British Journal of Audiology, 33, 89.
57. Prieve, B. A., Gorga, M. P., Schmidt, A., Neely, S., Peters, J., Schultes, L., & Jesteadt, W. (1993). Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 3308-3319.
58. Rhode, W. S., & Cooper, N. P. (1996). Nonlinear mechanics in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea in vivo. Auditory Neuroscience, 3, 101-121.
59. Robles, L., & Ruggero, M. A. (2001). Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiological Reviews, 81, 1305-1352.
60. Roede, J., Harris, F. P., Probst, R., & Xu, L. (1993). Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology, 32, 273-281.
61. Scheffé, H. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40, 87-104.
62. Schneider, S., Prijs, V. F., & Schoonhoven, R. (2003). Amplitude and phase of distortion-product emissions in the guinea pig in an (f1, f2) area study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 3285-3296.
63. Shaffer, L. A., Withnell, R. H., Dhar, S., Lilly, D. J., Goodman, S. S., & Harmon, K. M. (2003). Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: Implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity. Ear and Hearing, 24, 367-379.
64. Shera, C. A. (2004). Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 25, 86-97.
65. Shera, C. A., & Guinan, J. J. (1999). Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 782-798.
66. Stover, L., Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., & Montoya, D. (1996). Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 956-967.
67. Stover, L. J., Neely, S. T., & Gorga, M. P. (1996). Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1016-1024.
68. Swets, J. A. (1988, June 3). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
69. Swets, J. A., & Pickett, R. M. (1982). Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods for signal detection. New York: Academic Press.
70. Talmadge, C. L., Long, G. R., Tubis, A., & Dhar, S. (1999). Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 275-292.
71. Talmadge, C. L., Tubis, A., Long, G. R., & Piskorski, P. (1998). Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1517-1543.
72. Whitehead, M. L., McCoy, M. J., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1995). Dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears: I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2346-2358.
73. Whitehead, M. L., Stagner, B. B., McCoy, M. J., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1995). Dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears: II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2359-2377.
74. Wilson, J. P. (1980). Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine structure, and tonal tinnitus. Hearing Research, 2, 233-252.
75. Withnell, R. H., Shaffer, L. A., & Talmadge, C. L. (2003). Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig. Hearing Research, 178, 106-117.
76. Yates, G. K., & Withnell, R. H. (1999). The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 136, 49-64.