Characteristics of the acoustic distortion product 2f2-f1 from the normal human ear

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 32-36

  Erminy, M ^a,c   Avan, P ^b   Bonfils, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^c Hopital Boucicaut   (France)

Author keywords

Audiology; Cochlea; Distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HEARING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND PRESSURE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PITCH PERCEPTION; REFERENCE VALUES; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 0031951592     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016489850155099     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kim DO, Molnar CE, Matthews JW. Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1704-21.
2. Gaskill SA, Brown AM. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 89: 821-39.
3. Bonfils P, Avan P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 1069-76.
4. Bonfils P, Avan P, Elbez M, Deys S, Erminy M, François M. Auditory threshold evaluation by distortion-product oto-acoustic emissions using decision support system. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 114: 360-5.
5. Avan P, Bonfils P. Frequency selectivity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1993; 32: 12-26.
6. Martin GK, Ohlms LA, Franklin DJ, Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL. Distortion-product emissions in humans, III: Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 30-42.
7. Schmiedt RA. Acoustic distortion products in the ear canal I. Cubic different tones: Effect of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1481-90.
8. Brown AM, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143-56.
9. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. 1. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1587-607.
10. Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Scheinin SA, Coats AC. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191-208.
11. Harris FP, Probst R. Technical issues related to the clinical measurement of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. In: Thornton ARD, Grandori F, eds. Advances in audiology, VoI II, Recording techniques for otoacoustic emissions. Commission of the European Communities, L1995: 13-9.
12. Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 1993; 65: 216-33.
13. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Probst R, Coats AC. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res 1987; 28: 173-89.
14. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220-9.