Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: A prospective, randomized study

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 5-11

  Bakhtiary, Farhad ^a   Abolmaali, Nasreddin ^a   Dzemali, Omer ^a   Wittlinger, Thomas ^a   Doss, Mirko ^a   Moritz, Anton ^a   Kleine, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLOW RATE; HEART MUSCLE OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CORONARY CIRCULATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 31844440684     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Butchart EG, Hui-Hua L, Payne N, Buchan K, Grunkemeier GL. Twenty-years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:1090-1100
2. Lund O, Nielsen SL, Arildsen H, et al. Standard aortic St. Jude valve at 18 years: Performance profile and determinants of outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1459-1465
3. Arata K, Iguro Y, Masuda H, et al. Long-term follow up in patients receiving a small aortic valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:780-784
4. Mortasawi A, Gehle S, Schroder T, et al. Aortic valve replacement in 80- and over 80-year-old patients. Short-term and long-term results. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2000;33:438-446
5. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, et al. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:146-1454
6. David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM, Cohen G. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:268-277
7. Kleine P, Klesius AA, Scherer M, Abdel-Rahman U, Moritz A. Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10:494
8. Kleine P, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Scherer M, Moritz A. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:857-863
9. Kleine P, Scherer M, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Moritz A. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: Comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:925-932
10. Scherer M, Abdel-Rahman U, Dzermali O, et al. Pathophysiology of coronary artery flow during extracorporeal circulation (ECC), myocardial ischemia and mechanical aortic valve replacement: An experimental study. Cardiology 2005;1:30-35
11. Kenny A, Wisbey CR, Shapiro LM. Profiles of coronary blood flow velocity in patients with aortic stenosis and the effect of valve replacement: A transthoracic echocardiographic study. Br Heart J 1994;71:57-62
12. Hildick-Smith DJ, Shapiro LM. Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: An adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1889-1896
13. Elhendy A, Modesto KM, Mahoney DW, et al. Prediction of mortality in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy by clinical, exercise stress, and echocardiographic data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:129-135
14. Saito Y, Sakuma H, Shibata M, et al. Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve using fast velocity-encoded cine MRI for noninvasive detection of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3:209-214
15. Hermida RC, Fernandez JR, Ayala DE, Mojon A, Alonso I, Smolensky M. Circadian rhythm of double (rate-pressure) product in healthy normotensive young subjects. Chronobiol Int 2001;18:475-489
16. Feit F, Brooks MM, Sopko G, et al. Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. The BARI Investigators. Circulation 2000;101:2795-2802
17. Puvimanasinghe JP, Takkenberg JJ, Edwards MB, et al. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation. Heart 2004;90:1172-1178
18. Kleine P, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Perthel M, Wesemeyer D, Laas J. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:308-312
19. Demers P, Miller DC. Simple modification of 'T. David-V' valve-sparing aortic root replacement to create graft pseudosinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1479-1481
20. Nygaard H, Paulsen PK, Hasenkam JM, Kromann-Hansen O, Pedersen EM, Rovsing PE. Quantitation of the turbulent stress distribution downstream of normal, diseased and artificial aortic valves in humans. J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6:609-617
21. Kleine P, Perthel M, Nygaard H, et al. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: Downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in swine. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:548-555
22. Sripathi VC, Tech B, Kumar RK, Balakrishnan KR. Further insights into normal aortic valve function: Role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:844-851
23. Dellgren G, Feindel CM, Bos J, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV: Long-term clinical and hemodynamic results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:698-702