New kernels for protein structural motif discovery and function classification

ICML 2005 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 945-952

  Wang, Chang ^a   Scott, Stephen D ^b  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES;

FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION; GENERAL-PURPOSE KERNELS; PROTEIN STRUCTURAL MOTIF DISCOVERY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

PROTEINS;

EID: 31844433226     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bradley, P., Kim, P. S., & Berger, B. (2002). Trilogy: discovery of sequence structure patterns across diverse proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 8500-8505).
2. Fetrow, J. S., & Skolnick, J. (1998). Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and t1ribonucleases. J. of Mol. Biology, 281, 949-968.
3. Holm, L., & Sander, C. (1993). Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. of Molecular Biology, 233, 123-138.
4. Holm, L., & Sander, C. (1995). 3-D lookup: Fast protein structure database searches at 90% reliability. Proceedings of the Third Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (pp. 179-187).
5. Joachims, T. (1999). Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning (pp. 169-184).
6. Jonassen, I., Eidhammer, I., Conklin, D., & Taylor, W. (2002). Structure motif discovery and mining the PDB. Bioinformatics, 18, 362-367.
7. Martin, J. (1995). Thioredoxin - a fold for all reasons. Structure, 3, 245-250.
8. Meng, E., Polacco, B., & Babbitt, P. (2004). Superfamily active site templates. Proteins, 55, 962-976.
9. Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia, C. (1995). SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. Journal of Molecular Biology, 247(4), 536-540.
10. Orengo, C. A., Michie, A. D., Jones, S., Jones, D. T., Swindells, M. B., & Thornton, J. M. (1997). CATH - a hierarchical classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5, 1093-1108.
11. Schmollinger, M., Fischer, I., Nerz, C., Pinkenburg, S., Götz, F., Kaufmann, M., Lange, K. J., Reuter, R., Rosenstiel, W., & Zell, A. (2004). ParSeq: searching motifs with structural and biochemical properties. Bioinformatics, 20(9), 1459-1461.
12. Shindyalov, I. N. & Bourne, P. E. (1998). Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Engineering, 11, 739-747.
13. Taylor, W. R., & Orengo, C. A. (1989). Protein structure alignment. J. of Molecular Biology, 208, 1-22.
14. Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A., & Thornton, J. M. (1996). Derivation of 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases: application to serhis-asp catalytic triads in the serine proteinases and lipases. Protein Science, 5(6), 1001-1013.
15. Wang, M., Roberts, D. L., Paschke, R., Shea, T. M., Masters, B. S., & Kim, J. J. (1997). Three-dimensional structure of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase: prototype for fmn- and fad-containing enzymes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(16), 8411-8416.
16. Zhang, B., Rychlewski, L., Pawlowski, K., Fetrow, J., Skolnick, J., & Godzik, A. (1999). From fold predictions to function predictions: automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions. Protein Science, 8, 1104-1115.