Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT

European Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1341-1347

  Knollmann, Friedrich D ^a   Möller, Jörg ^b   Gebert, Axel ^b   Bethge, Christian ^b   Felix, Roland ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; Coronary vessels; Electron beam computed tomography; Stents

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRON BEAM TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 4444312942     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2337-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG (1998) Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med 339:1964-1971
2. Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HD et al (1998) Coronary artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med 339:1672-1678
3. Ruygrok PN, Webster MWI, de Valk V et al (2002) Clinical and angiographic factors associated with asymptomatic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 104:2289-2294
4. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J et al (2001) Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. Am J Cardiol 87:34-39
5. Pump H, Möhlenkamp S, Sehnert CA et al (2000) Coronary artery stent patency: assessment with electron-beam CT Radiology 214:447-452
6. Lu B, Dai R et al (2000) Detection and analysis of intracoronary artery stent after PTCA using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional electron-beam tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 12:1-6
7. Möhlenkamp S, Pump H et al (1999) Minimally invasive evaluation of coronary stents with electron-beam computed tomography: in vivo and in vitro experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:39-47
8. TIMI Study Group (1985) The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 312:932-936
9. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PMT, de Feyter PJ (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051-2054
10. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W (2000) In-plane coronary motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 216:457-463
11. Lu B, Zhuang N, Mao S-S et al (2002) EKG-triggered CT data acquisition to reduce variability in coronary arterial calcium score. Radiology 224:838-844
12. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS et al (1986) Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:693-698
13. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS et al (1987) Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. Circulation 75:1018-1024
14. Stanford W, Brundage BH, MacMillan R et al (1988) Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary artery bypass patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:1-7
15. Weiss RM, Grover-McKay (1994) Assessment of coronary artery patency with cine computed tomography in a dog model of occlusion-reperfusion. Invest Radiol 29:168-171
16. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K (1997) Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 79:856-861
17. Pump H, Moehlenkamp S, Sehnert C et al (1998) Electron-beam CT in the noninvasive assessment of coronary stent patency. Acad Radiol 5:858-862
18. Schmermund A, Haude M, Baumgart D et al (1996) Non-invasive assessment of coronary palmaz-schatz stents by contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography. Eur Heart J 17:1546-1553
19. Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirschinger J, Schömig A (1998) Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation 98:1875-1880
20. Sinitsyn V, Belkind M et al (2003) Relationships between coronary calcification detected at electron beam computed tomography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty results in coronary artery disease patients. Eur Radiol 13:62-67
21. American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756-1824
22. Nikolaou K, Huber A et al (2002) Intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced electron-beam computed tomography and navigator-echo-based magnetic resonance imaging for non-invasive coronary artery angiography. Eur Radiol 12:1663-1671
23. Krüger S, Mahnken AH et al (2003) Nultislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 89:167-172
24. Maintz D, Juergens KU et al (2003) Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: an in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 13:830-835
25. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama P, de Feyter P (2003) Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice s piral computed tomography. Herz 28:136-142
26. Knollmann F, Pfoh A (2003) Coronary artery imaging with flat-panel computed tomography. Circulation 107:1209