Citation and hyperlink networks

Current Science

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1518-1524

  Scharnhorst, Andrea ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^b  

^a ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citation; Co authorship networks; Complex networks; Hyperlink networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 31644432053     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: 00113891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Garfield, E., Citation indexes for science. Science, 1955, 122(3159), 108-111.
2. Garfield, E., Historiographs, librarianship and the history of science. Essays of an Inf. Sci., 1974, 2, 136-150 http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/ essays/v132p136y1974-1976.pdf.
3. Marshakova, I. V., System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Teknich.Inf., 1973, 2, 3-8.
4. Small, H., Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1973, 24(4), 265-269.
5. White, H. D. and Griffith, B. C., Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1982, 32(3), 163-172.
6. Arunachalam, S. and Doss, M. J., Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Curr. Sci., 2000, 79(5), 621-628.
7. Cawkell, T., Visualizing citation connections. In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield (ed. Cronin, B.), Information Today Inc., Medford, NJ, 2000, pp. 177-194.
8. Leydesdorff, L., Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Res. Policy, 1989, 18, 209-223.
9. Chen, C., Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Inf. Proc. Manage., 1999, 35(3), 401-420.
10. Börner, K., Chen, C. M. and Boyack, K. W., Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37, 179-255.
11. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I. and Istomin, V. I., Mapping the output of topical searches in the Web of Knowledge and the case of Watson-Crick. Inf. Technol. Libr., 2003, 22(4), 183-187.
12. Small, H., Visualising science through citation mapping. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1999, 50(9), 799-813.
13. Scharnhorst, A., Evolution in adaptive landscapes - examples of science and technology development. In Collaboration in Science (eds Havemann, F. and Kretschmer, H.), Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung, Berlin, 2002, pp. 118-142.
14. Davidson, G. S., Hendrickson, B., Johnson, D. K., Meyers, C. E. and Wylie, B. N., Knowledge mining with VxInsight: discovery through interaction. J. Intell. Inf. Syst., 1998, 11(3), 259-285.
15. Marion, L. S., Garfield, E., Hargens, L. L., Lievrouw, L. A., White, H. D. and Wilson, C. S., Social network analysis and citation network analysis: Complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication. ASIST 2003: Proceedings of the 66th ASIST Annual Meeting, 2003, vol. 40, pp. 486-487.
16. Barabási, A. L., Linked: The New Science of Networks, Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, 2002.
17. Huberman, B. A., The Laws of the Web: Patterns in the Ecology of Information, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001.
18. Scharnhorst, A., Complex networks and the web: Insights from nonlinear physics. J. Comput. Med. Commun., 2003, 8(4), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/ issue4/scharnhorst.html
19. Newman, M. E. J., The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, 98(2), 404-409.
20. Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T., Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica, 2002, A311(3-4), 590-614, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0104162/
21. Li, M., Wu, J., Wang, D., Zhou, T., Di, Z. and Fan, Y., Evolving model of weighted networks inspired by scientific collaboration networks. arXiv:cond-mat/0501655v2, 2005, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0501655
22. Price, D. d. S., A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1976, 27, 292-306.
23. Merton, R. K., The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973.
24. Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E. and Scharnhorst, A., Characteristics and impact of the Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics, 1997, 40(3), 407-422.
25. Leydesdorff, L., Theories of citation. Scientometrics, 1998, 43(1), 5-25.
26. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and Mendes, J. F. F., Evolution of networks. Adv. Phys., 2002, 51, 1079-1187.
27. Björneborn, L., Small-world link structures across an academic web space: a library and information science approach, Ph D dissertation, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, 2004, available at the URL http://www.db.dk/lb/phd/phd-thesis.pdf.
28. Cronin, B., Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. J. Inf. Sci., 2001, 27(1), 1-7.
29. Ingwersen, P., The calculation of web impact factors. J. Document., 1998, 54(2), 236-243.
30. Vaughan, L. and Hysen, K., Relationship between links to journal web sites and impact factors. ASLIB Proc., 2002, 54(6), 356-361.
31. Vaughan, L. and Shaw, D., Bibliographic and web citations: What is the difference?. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003, 54(14), 1313-1322.
32. Vaughan, L. and Wu, G., Links to commercial websites as a source of business information. Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3), 487-496.
33. Heimeriks, G., Hörlesberger, M. and van den Besselaar, P., Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2), 391-413.
34. Leydesdorff, L. and Scharnhorst, A., Measuring the knowledge base: a program of innovation studies. Report to the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. 2002, http://www.sciencepolicystudies.de/dok/expertise-leydesdorff-scharnhorst.pdf
35. Leydesdorff, L. and Curran, M., Mapping university-industry-government relations on the Internet: the construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics, 2000, 4, http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/ v4i1p2.html.
36. Beaulieu, A., From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies History Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci., 2004, 35(2), 367-390.
37. Beaulieu, A., Sociable hyperlinks: an ethnographic approach to connectivity. In Virtual Methods - Issues in Social Research on the Internet (ed. Hine, C.) Berg, Oxford, 2005, pp. 183-197.
38. Fry, J. and Talja, S., The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields. Paper presented at the ASIST 2004: Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting, 2004, pp. 20-30.
39. Thelwall, M., Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university web site interlinking. J. Document., 2002, 58(5), 563-574.
40. Vasileiadou, E. and Besselaar, P. van den, Linking shallow, linking deep - How scientific intermediaries use the web for their network of collaborators. Cybermetrics (in prep.), 2005.
41. Fry, J., Understanding disciplinary differential on the web. Cybermetrics (in prep.), 2005.
42. van Raan, A. F. J., In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much. Scientometrics, 1998, 43(1), 129-148.
43. Cronin, B., A hundred million acts of whimsy?, Curr. Sci., 2005, 89, 1505-1509.
44. Moed, H. F., The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits. Nature, 2002, 415, 731-732.
45. van Raan, A. F. J., The Pandora's box of citation analysis: Measuring scientific excellence - The last evil? In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield (eds Cronin, B. and Atkins, H. B.), ASIS Monograph Series, Information Today, Inc, Medford, 2000, pp. 301-319.
46. Borgman, C. L. and Furner, J., Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36, 3-72.
47. Cronin, B., The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, Taylor Graham, London, 1984.
48. Rousseau, R., Sitations: an exploratory study. Cybermetrics, 1997, 1(1), http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html.
49. Kim, H. J., Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: A qualitative study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 2000, 51(10), 887-899.
50. Smith, A. G., A tale of two web spaces; comparing sites using web impact factors. J. Document., 1999, 55(5), 577-592.
51. Bar-Ilan, J., A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country - the case of Israel. Scientometrics, 2004a, 59(3), 391-403.
52. Bar-Ilan, J., Self-linking and self-linked rates of academic institutions on the web. Scientometrics, 2004b, 59(1), 29-41.
53. Bar-Ilan, J., What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environments. Inf. Proc. Manage., 2005, 41(3), 973-986.
54. Harries, G., Wilkinson, D., Price, E., Fairclough, R. and Thelwall, M., Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping. J. Inf. Sci., 2004, 30(5), 436-447.
55. Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M. and Price, E., Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. J. Inf. Sci., 2003, 29(1), 49-56.
56. Thelwall, M., What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation. Inf. Res., 2003, 8(3), http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper151.html.
57. Harnard, S. and Carr, L., Integrating, navigating, and analysing open eprint archives through open citation linking (the OpCit project). Curr. Sci., 2000, 79(5), 629-638.
58. Moed, H. F., Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2005, 56(10), 1088-1097.