Textural characterization of finished and polished composites over time of intraoral exposure

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 381-388

  Turssi, Cecilia Pedroso ^a   Rodrigues Jr , Antonio Luiz ^b   Serra, Mônica Campos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Composite; Degradation; Surface characterization

Indexed keywords

DIAMONDS; FINISHING; POLISHING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

MYLAR MATRIX STRIP; RESIN COMPOSITES;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; DIAMOND; RESIN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPOSITE GRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYBRIDIZATION; INSTRUMENT; MALE; MATERIAL STATE; MOUTH; PALATE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 31544447468     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30384     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gordan VV. Clinical evaluation of replacement of class V resin based composite restorations. J Dent 2001;29:485-488.
2. Elderton RJ. Principles in the management of dental caries. In: Elderton RJ, editor. The dentition and dental care. Oxford: Heinemann Medical Books; 1990. p 237-262.
3. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-68.
4. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
5. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:225-227.
6. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Darius PL, van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:138-144.
7. Yamamoto K, Ohashi S, Taki E, Hirata K. Adherence of oral streptococci to composite resin of varying surface roughness. Dent Mater J 1996;15:201-204.
8. Carlén A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001;22:481-487.
9. Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-269.
10. Hondrum SO, Fernández R Jr. Contouring, finishing, and polishing class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997;22:30-36.
11. Jung M. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Oper Dent 1997;22:98-104.
12. Hoelscher DC, Neme AML, Pink FE, Hughes PJ. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:36-42.
13. Joniot SB, Grégoire GL, Auther AM, Roques YM. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 2000;25:311-315.
14. Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G, Rumi G. 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 2001;26:562-568.
15. Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004;29:203-211.
16. Roulet J, Wälti C. Influence of oral fluid on composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:182-189.
17. Asmussen E. Clinical relevance of physical, chemical, and bonding properties of composite resins. Oper Dent 1985;10:61-73.
18. van Groeningen G, Jongebloed W, Arends J. Composite degradation in vivo. Dent Mater 1986;2:225-227.
19. Cho L-R, Yi Y-J, Heo S-J. Effect of tooth brushing and thermal cycling on a surface change of ceromers finished with different methods. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:816-822.
20. Heath JR, Wilson HJ. Forces and rates observed during in vivo toothbrushing. Biomed Eng 1974;9:61-64.
21. Attin T, Zirkel C, Hellwig E. Brushing abrasion of eroded dentin after application of sodium fluoride solutions. Caries Res 1998;32:344-350.
22. Jaffer F, Finer Y, Santerre JP. Interactions between resin monomers and commercial composite resins with human saliva derived esterases. Biomaterials 2002;23:1707-1719.
23. Larsen IB, Munksgaard EC. Effect of human saliva on surface degradation of composite resins. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99: 254-261.
24. Rémond G, Nockolds C, Phillips M, Roques-Carmes C. Implications of polishing techniques in quantitative x-ray microanalysis. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 2002;107:639-662.
25. Sulong MZ, Aziz RA. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:342-349.
26. Turssi CP, Purquerio BM, Serra MC. Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods-a review. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2003; 658:280-285.
27. Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996;21:53-58.
28. Ferracane JL. Abrasion and polishing. In: Ferracane JL, editor. Materials in dentistry: principles and applications, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Willians & Wilkins; 2001. p 293-310.