Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium

Nature

Volumn 439, Issue 7075, 2006, Pages 475-479

  Micchelli, Craig A ^a   Perrimon, Norbert ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; BIOLOGY; DISEASES; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ADULT DROSOPHILA MIDGUT EPITHELIUM; CELL DIVISION; GENETIC MOSAIC ANALYSIS; STEM CELLS;

CELLS;

BIOLOGY;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; DROSOPHILA; EPITHELIUM; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETICS; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; MIDGUT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 31444452338     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature04371     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Radtke, F. & Clevers, H. Self-renewal and cancer of the gut: Two sides of a coin. Science 307, 1904-1909 (2005).
2. Molofsky, A. V., Pardal, R. & Morrison, S. J. Diverse mechanisms regulate stem cell self-renewal. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 700-707 (2004).
3. Strasburger, M. Bau, Funktion und Variabilität des Darmtractus von Drosophila melanogaster Meigen. Zeit. f. wiss. Zool. 140, 539-649 (1932).
4. Wigglesworth, V. The Principles of Insect Physiology (Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, 1965).
5. Miller, A. in The Biology of Drosophila (ed. Demerec, M.) 420-442 (Hafner, New York, 1950).
6. Bozuck, A. N. DNA synthesis in the absence of somatic cell division associated with ageing in Drosophila subobscura. Exp. Geront. 7, 147-156 (1972).
7. Lee, T. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neural morphogenesis. Neuron 22, 451-461 (1999).
8. Xu, T. & Rubin, G. M. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development 117, 1223-1237 (1993).
9. Furriols, M. & Bray, S. J. A model Notch response element detects Suppressor of Hairless dependent molecular switch. Curr. Biol. 11, 60-64 (2001).
10. Fuse, N., Hirose, S. & Hayashi, S. Diploidy of Drosophila imaginal cells is maintained by a transcriptional repressor encoded by escargot. Genes Dev. 8, 2270-2281 (1994).
11. Kiger, A., White-Cooper, H. & Fuller, M. T. Somatic support cells restrict germline stem cell self-renewal and promote differentiation. Nature 407, 750-754 (2000).
12. McGuire, S. E. et al. Spatiotemporal rescue of memory dysfunction in Drosophila. Science 302, 1765-1768 (2003).
13. Presente, A., Shaw, S., Nye, J. S. & Andres, A. J. Transgene-mediated RNA interference defines a novel role for Notch in chemosensory startle behaviour. Genesis 34, 165-169 (2002).
14. Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature advance online publication, 7 December 2005 (doi:10.1038/nature04333).
15. Torii, M. et al. Transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 delineate early steps in differentiation of neural stem celts in the developing central nervous system. Development 126, 443-456 (1999).
16. Li, L. & Vaessin, H. Pan-neural prospero terminates cell proliferation during Drosophila neurogenesis. Genes Dev. 14, 147-151 (2000).
17. Schonhoff, S. E., Giel-Moloney, M. & Leiter, A. B. Minireview: Development and differentiation of gut endocrine cells. Endocrinology 145, 2639-2644 (2005).
18. Xie, T. & Spradling, A. in Stem Cell Biology (eds Marshak, D. R., Gardner, R. L. & Gottlieb, D.) 129-148 (Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York, 2001).
19. Kiger, A. & Fuller, M. in Stem Cell Biology (eds Marshak, D. R, Gardner, R. L. & Gottlieb, D.) 149-187 (Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York, 2001).