Preferences of dead wood inhabiting bryophytes for decay stage, log size and habitat types in Hungarian beech forests

Journal of Bryology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 79-95

  Ódor, Péter ^a   Van Hees, Ad F M ^b  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bryophytes; Dead wood; Generalized linear model; Succession

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; FAGUS; MARCHANTIOPHYTA; PTERIDOPHYTA;

EID: 3142726669     PISSN: 03736687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/037366804225021038     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Andersson LI, Hytteborn H. 1991. Bryophytes and decaying wood - a comparison between managed and natural forest. Holarctic Ecology 14: 121-130.
2. Arthur MA, Tritton LM, Fahey TJ. 1993. Dead bole mass and nutrients remaining 23 years after clear-felling of a northern hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 1298-1305.
3. Aude E, Lawesson JE. 1998. Vegetation in Danish beech forest: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning. Plant Ecology 134: 53-65.
4. Aude E, Poulsen RS. 2000. Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forest. Applied Vegetation Science 3: 81-88.
5. Barkman JJ. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Assen: Van Gorcum.
6. Barkman JJ. 1973. Synusial approaches to classification. In: Whittaker RH, ed. Ordination and classification of communities. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk. Publishers, 435-492.
7. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR. 1996. Ecology, individuals, populations and communities. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
8. Boddy L. 2001. Fungal community ecology and wood decomposition processes in angiosperms: from standing tree to complete decay of course woody debris. Ecological Bulletins 49: 43-56.
9. Boros Á. 1968. Bryogeographic und Bryoflora Ungarns. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
10. Corley MFV, Crundwell AC. 1991. Additions and amendments to the mosses of Europe and the Azores. Journal of Bryology 16: 337-356.
11. Corley MFV, Crundwell AC, Düll R, Hill MO, Smith AJE. 1981. Mosses of Europe and the Azores; an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. Journal of Bryology 11: 609-689.
12. Cornelissen JHC, Karssemeijer GJ. 1987. Bryophyte vegetation on spruce stumps in the Hautes-Fagnes, Belgium, with special reference to wood decay. Phytocoenologia 15: 485-504.
13. Crawley MJ. 1986. The structure of plant communities. In: Crawley MJ, ed. Plant ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1-50.
14. Csóka Gy. 2000. Az elpusztult, korhadó fa szerepe az erdei biodiverzitás fenntartásában. In: Frank T, ed. Természet - Erdo - Gazdálkodás. Eger: Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület, Pro Silva Hungaria Egyesület, 85-96.
15. Czájlik P. 1996. Koreloszlás és szukcesszió háborítatlan erdoállományokban: esettanulmá ny. In: Mátyás Cs, ed. Erdészeti ökólogia. Budapest: Mezogazdasági Kiadó, 84-92.
16. During HJ, van Tooren BF. 1987. Recent developments in bryophyte population ecology. Trends in Evolution and Ecology 2: 89-93.
17. Eckloff W, Ziegler W. 1991. Über den Wert toter Bäume in der Waldlebensgemeinschaft. Forstarchiv 62: 105-107.
18. Esseen P-A, Ehnström B, Ericson L, Sjöberg K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46: 16-47.
19. Fehér G, Orbȧn S. 1981. A bükki oserdo korhadó fáinak mohacönológìaì vìzsgálata. Folia Historica-naturalis Musei Matrensis 7: 15-28.
20. Ferris-Kaan R, Lonsdale, D, Winter T. 1993. The conservation management of dead wood in forests. Research Information Note 241. Alice Holt: The Forestry Authority, Research Division.
21. Goia I, Schumacher R. 2000. Researches on the bryophytes from rotten wood in the Ariesului mic basin. Contributii Botanice 1: 91-99.
22. Green P, Peterken GF. 1997. Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. Forest Ecology and Management 98: 229-238.
23. Grolle R. 1983. Hepatics of Europe including the Azores: an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. Journal of Bryology 12: 403-459.
24. Gustafsson L, Hallingbäck T. 1988. Bryophyte flora and vegetation of managed and virgin coniferous forest in south-west Sweden. Biological Conservation 44: 283-300.
25. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 133-276.
26. Heilmann-Clausen J. 2001. A gradient analysis of communities of macrofungi and slime moulds on decaying beech logs. Mycological Research 105: 575-596.
27. Hofgaard A. 1993. Structure and regeneration pattern in a virgin Picea abies forest in northern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 601-608.
28. Hübschmann A. 1986. Prodromus der Moosgesellschaften Zentraleuropas. Berlin, Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
29. Jonsson BG. 2000. Availability of coarse woody debris in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 51-56.
30. Jonsson BG, Söderström L. 1988. Growth and reproduction in the leafy hepatic Ptilidium pulcherrimum (G. Web.) Vainio during a 4-year period. Journal of Bryology 15: 315-325.
31. Kimmerer RW. 1993. Disturbance and dominance in Tetraphis pellucida: a model of disturbance frequency and reproductive mode. Bryologist 96: 73-79.
32. Kimmerer RW, Young CC. 1996. Effect of gap size and regeneration niche on species coexistence in bryophyte communities. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123: 16-24.
33. Kirby KJ, Reid CM, Thomas RC, Goldsmith FB. 1997. Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 148-155.
34. Kruys N, Fries C, Jonsson BG, Lämäs T, Stähl G. 1999. Wood inhabiting cryptogams on dead Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees in managed Swedish boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 178-186.
35. Kruys N, Jonsson BG. 1999. Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests in northern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 1295-1299.
36. Laaka-Lindberg S. 1999. Asexual reproduction in a population of a leafy hepatic species Lophozia silvicola Buch in central Norway. Plant Ecology 141: 137-144.
37. Laaka-Lindberg S, Heino M. 2001. Clonal dynamics and evolution of dormancy in the leafy hepatic Lophozia silvicola. Oikos 94: 525-532.
38. Lesica P, McCune B, Cooper SV, Hong WS. 1991. Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1745-1755.
39. MacMillan PC. 1988. Decomposition of coarse woody debris in an old-growth Indiana forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 1353-1362.
40. Marosi S, Somogyi S, eds. 1990. Magyarország kistájainak katasztere I. Budapest: MTA Földrajztudományi Kutató Intézet.
41. Marstaller R. 1986. Die Moosgesellschaften auf morschem Holz und Rohhumus. Gleditschia 15: 73-138.
42. Maser C, Trappe JM. 1984. The seen and unseen world of the fallen tree. General technical report PNW-164. Portland, Oregon: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
43. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. 1983. Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.
44. McCullough HA. 1948. Plant succession on fallen logs in a virgin spruce-fir forest. Ecology 29: 508-513.
45. Means JE, MacMillan PC, Cromack K. 1992. Biomass and nutrient content of douglas-fir logs and other detrital pools in an old-growth forest, Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 1536-1546.
46. Muhle H, LeBlanc F. 1975. Bryophyte and lichen succession on decaying logs. I. Analysis along an evaporational gradient in Eastern Canada. Journal of Hattori Botanical Laboratory 39: 1-33.
47. Ódor P. 2000. Description of the bryoflora and bryophyte vegetation of Kékes North Forest Reserve in Mátra mountains (N-Hungary). Kitaibelia 5: 115-123.
48. Ódor P, Standovár T. 2001. Richness of bryophyte vegetation in near-natural and managed beech stands: the effects of management-induced differences in dead wood. Ecological Bulletins 49: 219-229.
49. Ódor P, Standovár T. 2002. Substrate specificity and community structure of bryophyte vegetation in a near-natural montane beech forests. Community Ecology 3: 39-49.
50. Ódor P, van Dort K. 2003. Dead wood inhabiting bryophyte vegetation in two Slovenian beech forest reserves. Zbornik Gozdarstva in Lesarstva 69: 155-169.
51. Orbán S, Vajda L. 1983. Magyarország mohafló rájának kézikönyve. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
52. Payne RW, Arnold GM, eds. 2000. Genstat release 4.2 reference manual. Vols I-III. Oxford: VSN International.
53. Peterken GF. 1996. Natural woodland. Ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Podani J. 1993. SYN-TAX-pc computer programs for multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematks. Version 5.0. User's Guide. Budapest: Scientia Publishing.
55. Podani J. 2000. Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
56. Podani J. 2001. SYN-TAX 2000. Computer programs for data analysis in ecology and systematics. User's manual. Budapest: Scientia Publishing.
57. Podani J, Feoli E. 1991. A general strategy for the simultaneous classification of variables and objects in ecological data tales. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 435-444.
58. Rambo TR, Muir PS. 1998. Bryophyte species association with coarse woody debris and stand ages in Oregon. Bryologist 101: 366-376.
59. Raschendorfer I. 1949. Beobachtungen über die Besiedlung von modernem Holz mit besonderer Berüchsichtigung der adnaten Vereine. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschfritt 96: 232-280.
60. Rasmussen L. 1975. The bryophytic epiphyte vegetation in the forest, slotved Skov, Northern Jutland. Lindbergia 3: 15-38.
61. Samuelsson J, Gustafsson L, Ingelög T. 1994. Dying and dead trees - a review of their importance for biodiversity. Uppsala: Swedish Threatened Species Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Science.
62. Slack NG. 1976. Host specificity of bryophytic epiphytes in eastern North America. Journal of Hattori Botanical Laboratory 41: 107-132.
63. Söderström L. 1988a. The occurrence of epixylic bryophyte and lichen species in an old natural and a managed forest stand in Northeast Sweden. Biological Conservation 45: 169-178.
64. Söderström L. 1988b. Sequence of bryophytes and lichens in relation to substrate variables of decaying coniferous wood in Northern Sweden. Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 89-97.
65. Söderström L. 1988c. Niche width and niche overlap in some epixylic bryophytes. In: Herben T, ed. Proceedings of the sixth CEBWG Meeting. Liblice, Czechoslovakia, 108-119.
66. Söderström L. 1989. Regional distribution patterns of bryophyte species on spruce logs in northern Sweden. Bryologist 92: 349-355.
67. Söderström L. 1990. Dispersal and distribution patterns in patchy, temporary habitats. In: Krahulec F, ed. Spatial processes in plant communities. The Hague: SBP Publishers, 99-109.
68. Söderström L, Herben T. 1997. Dynamics of bryophyte metapopulations. Advances in Bryology 6: 205-240.
69. Söderström L, Jonsson BG. 1989. Spatial pattern and dispersal in the leafy hepatic Ptilidium pulcherrimum. Journal of Bryology 15: 793-802.
70. Söderström L, Jonsson BG. 1992. Fragmentation of old-growth forests and bryophytes on temporary substrates. Svensk Botaniser Tidskrkrift 86: 185-198.
71. Stefureac TI. 1969. Studii briologice in unele formatiuni de vegetatie din Romania. Bucarest: Editura Academia Republicii Socialiste Romania.
72. Venables, WN, Ripley, BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer.
73. Watson MA. 1980. Patterns of habitat occupation in mosses - relevance to considerations of the niche. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107: 346-372.