Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forests

Applied Vegetation Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 81-88

  Aude, Erik ^a,b   Poulsen, Roar S ^c  

^a DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

^b Kalø   (Denmark)

^c NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bryophyte; Correspondence Analysis; Lichen; Monte Carlo test; Multivariate analysis; Old growth forest; Shelterwood uniform system

Indexed keywords

FAGUS SYLVATICA;

EID: 0034086830     PISSN: 14022001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1478921     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Adams, D.B. & Risser, P.G. 1971. Some factors influencing the frequency of bark lichens in North Central Oklahoma. Am. J. Bot. 58: 752-757.
2. Almborn, O. 1948. Distribution and ecology of some South Scandinavian lichens. Bot. Not. 1: 1-254.
3. Almborn, O. 1955. Lavvegetation och lavflora på Hallands Väderö. K. Sven. Vetenskapsakad. Avh. Naturskyddsärenden 11: 1-92.
4. Andersson, L. & Appelquist, T. 1987. Lunglav och almlav, indikatorer på värdefull lövskog. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 81: 185-194.
5. Aude, E. & Lawesson, J.E. 1998. Vegetation in Danish beech forests: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning. Plant Ecol. 134: 35-65.
6. Barkman, J.J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum, Assen.
7. Billings, W.D. & Drew, W.B. 1938. Bark factors affecting the distribution of corticolous bryophytic communities. Am. Midl. Nat. 20: 302-330.
8. Borcard, C.H., Legendre, P. & Drapeau, P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
9. Christensen, S.N. & Søchting, U. 1996. Overvågning af lungelav i danske naturskove, pp. 1-39. Skov- og Naturstyrelsen, København.
10. Degelius, G. 1935. Das ozeanische Element der Strauch- und Laubflechtenflora von Skandinavien. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 7: 1-411.
11. Edwards, M.E. 1986. Disturbance histories of four Snowdonian woodlands and their relation to Atlantic bryophyte distribution. Biol. Conserv. 37: 301-320.
12. Emborg, J. 1998. Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For. Ecol. Manage. 106: 83-95.
13. Farmer, A.M., Bates, J.W. & Bell, J.N. 1991. Seasonal variations in acidic pollutant inputs and their effects on the chemistry of stemflow, bark and epiphyte tissues in three oak wooklands in N.W. Britain. New Phytol. 118: 441-451.
14. Frisvoll, A., Elvebakk, A., Flatberg, K. & Økland, R. 1995. Sjekkliste over norske mosar. Vitskapleg og norsk namneverk. Temahefte 4. pp. 1-101. NINA, Trondheim.
15. Fritz, Ö. & Larsson, K. 1997. Betydelse av skoglig kontinuitet för rödlistade lavar. En studie av halländsk bokskog. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 90: 241-262.
16. Galløe, O. 1908. Danske Likeners Økologi. Bot. Tidsskr. 28: 285-372.
17. Gauslaa, Y. 1995. The Lobarion, an epiphytic community of ancient forests threatened by acid rain. Lichenologist 27: 59-76.
18. Gauslaa, Y. & Ohlson, M. 1997. Et historisk perspektiv på kontinuitet og forekomst av epifyttiske laver i norske skoger. Blyttia 55: 15-27.
19. Geiger, R. 1966. Problems in forest meteorology. In: Geiger, R. (ed.) The climate near the ground, pp. 298-369. Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA.
20. Anon. 1996. Jordartskort 1:25.000. Geologiske undersøgelser, København.
21. Goward, T. 1994. Notes on oldgrowth-dependent epiphytic macrolichens in inland British Columbia, Canada. Acta Bot. Fenn. 150: 31-38.
22. Gustafsson, L., Fiskesjö, A., Hallingbäck, T., Ingelög, T. & Pettersson, B. 1992a. Semi-natural deciduous broadleaved woods in southern Sweden - habitat factors of importance to some bryophyte species. Biol. Conserv. 59: 175-181.
23. Gustafsson, L., Fiskesjö, A., Ingelög, T., Pettersson, B. & Thor, G. 1992b. Factors of importance to some lichen species of deciduous broad-leaved woods in southern Sweden. Lichenologist 24: 255-266.
24. Hale, M.E. 1955. Phytosociology of corticolous cryptogams in the upland forests of Southern Wisconsin. Ecology 36(1): 45-63.
25. Hallingbäck, T. 1992. The effect of air pollution on mosses in southern Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 59: 163-170.
26. Hallingbäck, T. & Weibull, H. 1996. En värdepyramid av mossor för naturvårdbedömning av ädellövskog. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 90: 129-140.
27. Henderson, A. 1995a. Literature on air pollution and lichens XLI. Lichenologist 27: 225-234.
28. Henderson, A. 1995b. Literature on pollution and lichens XLII. Lichenologist 27: 395-404.
29. Hennekens, S.M. 1996. TURBO(VEG). Software package for input, processing, and presentation of phytosociological data. IBN-DLO, Wageningen.
30. Henriksen, H.A. 1988. Skoven og dens dyrkning. Nyt Nordisk Forlag, København.
31. Hosokawa, T. & Odani, N. 1957. The daily compensation period and vertical ranges of epiphytes in a beech forest. J. Ecol. 45: 901-915.
32. Hutchison, B.A. & Matt, D.R. 1977. The distribution of solar radiation within a deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr. 47: 185-207.
33. Hyvärinen, M., Halonen, P. & Kauppi, M. 1992. Influence of stand age and structure on the epiphytic lichen vegetation in the middle-boreal forests of Finland. Lichenologist 24: 165-180.
34. Johnsen, I. & Søchting, U. 1973. Influence of air pollution on the epiphytic lichen vegetation and bark properties of deciduous trees in the Copenhagen area. Oikos 24: 344-351.
35. Jones, E.W. 1945. The structure and reproduction of the virgin forest of the north temperate zone. New Phytol. 44: 130-148.
36. Jongman, R.H.G., ter Braak, C.J.F. & van Tongeren, O.F.R. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen.
37. Kershaw, K.A. 1964. Preliminary observations on the distribution and ecology of epiphytic lichens in Wales. Lichenologist 2: 263-276.
38. Kuusinen, M. 1994a. Epiphytic lichen flora and diversity on Populus tremula in old-growth and managed forests of southern and middle boreal Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 31: 245-260.
39. Kuusinen, M. 1994b. Epiphytic lichen diversity on Salix caprea in old-growth southern and middle boreal forests of Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 31: 77-92.
40. Lesica, P., McCune, B., Cooper, S.V. & Hong, W.S. 1991. Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Can. J. Bot. 69: 1745-1755.
41. Matthews, J.D. 1991. Silvicultural systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Mattsson, J.-E. 1997. Rödlistade arter och miljöförändringar. In: Arup, U., Ekman, S., Kärnefelt, I., Mattsson, J.-E. (eds.)Skyddsvärda lavar i sydvästra Sverige, pp. 20-22. SBF-förlaget, Lund.
43. Meinunger, L. 1992. Endangered bryophytes in the eastern part of Germany. Biol. Conserv: 59: 211-214.
44. Moe, B. & Botnen, A. 1997. A quantitative study of the epiphytic vegetation on pollarded trunks of Fraxinus excelsior at Havrå, Osterøy, western Norway. Plant Ecol. 129: 157-177.
45. Møller, P.F. 1988. Naturskov i statsskovene. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse, Köbenhavn.
46. Müller, F. 1993. Moose und Flechten in zwei Naturwaldreservaten (Totalreservaten) im östlichen Deutschland. Herzogin 9: 543-572.
47. Økland, R. & Eilertsen, O. 1994. Canonical Correspondence Analysis with Variation Partitioning: some comments and an application. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 117-126.
48. Oksanen, J. 1988. Impact of habitat, substrate and microsite classes on the epiphyte vegetation: Interpretation using exploratory and canonical correspondence analysis. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 25: 59-71.
49. Olsen, C. 1917. Studier over epifyt-mossemes indvandringsrækkefølge (succession) på barken af vore forskellige træer. Bot. Tidsskr. 34: 313-341.
50. Olsen, S.R. & Gauslaa, Y. 1991. Långskägg, Usnea longissima, hotad även i södra Norge. [Usnea longissima, a lichen of ancient forest, threatened in Nordmarka, SE Norway]. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 85: 342-346.
51. Olsson, K. 1995. Changes in epiphytic lichen and moss flora in some beech forests in southern Sweden during 15 years. Ecol. Bull. 44: 238-247.
52. Palmer, M.W. & Dixon, P.M. 1990. Small-scale environmental heterogeneity and the analysis of species distributions along gradients. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 57-65.
53. Pedersen, I. 1980. Epiphytic lichen vegetation in an old oak wood, Kaas Skov. Bot. Tidsskr. 75: 105-120.
54. Piippo, S. 1982. Epiphytic bryophytes as climatic indicators in Eastern Fennoscandia. Acta Bot. Fenn. 119: 1-39.
55. Potzger, J.E. 1939. Microclimate, evaporation stress, and epiphytic mosses. Bryologist 42: 53-61.
56. Rasmussen, L. 1975. The bryophytic epiphyte vegetation in the forest, Slotved Skov, Northern Jutland. Lindbergia 3: 15-38.
57. Rose, F. 1976. Lichenological indicators of age and environmental continuity in woodlands. In: Brown, D.H., Hawksworth, D.L., Bailey, R.H. (eds.) Lichenology: progress and problems, pp. 279-307. Academic Press, London.
58. Rose, F. 1988. Phytogeographical and ecological aspects of Lobarion communities in Europe. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 69-79.
59. Rose, F. 1992. Temperate forest management: its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In: Bates, J.W. & Farmer, A.M. (eds.) Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment, pp. 211-233. Clarendon, London.
60. Santesson, R. 1993. The lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sweden and Norway. SBT förlaget, Lund.
61. Sergio, C., Sim-Sim, M. & Santos-Silva, C. 1990. Briófitos epifíticos como indicadores dos domínios bioclimáticos em Portucal. Tratemento estatístico de àreas seleccionadas. An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 46: 457-467.
62. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M.V. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 12: 1-20.
63. Sjögren, E. 1995. Changes in the epilithic and epiphytic moss cover in two deciduous forest areas on the island of Öland (Sweden) - a comparison between 1958-1962 and 1988-1990. Stud. Plant Ecol. 19: 1-106.
64. Søchting, U. & Christensen, S.N. 1989. Overvågning af laver i danske naturskove 1988. Naturovervågningsrapport. Miljøministeriet, Skov- og Naturstyrelsen, København.
65. Søchting, U. & Johnsen, I. 1975. Changes in the distribution of epiphytic lichens in the Copenhagen Area from 1936 to 1972. Bot. Tidsskr. 69: 60-63.
66. Söderstr̈m, L., Hallingbäck, T., Gustafsson, L. & Hedenäs, L. 1992. Bryophyte conservation for the future. Biol. Conserv. 59: 265-270.
67. Söderström, L. & Jonsson, E.G. 1992. Naturskogarnas fragmentering och mossor på temporära substrat. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 86: 185-198.
68. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
69. Sõmermaa, A. 1972. Ecology of epiphytic lichens in main Estonian forest types. Scr. Mycol. 4: 1-117.
70. Stoutjesdijk, Ph. & Barkman, J.J. 1987. Microclimate, vegetation and fauna. Opulus Press, Uppsala.
71. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987-1992. CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for Canonical Community Ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) Correspondence Analysis, Principal Component Analysis and Redundancy Analysis. Version 3.12. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
72. Tibell, L. 1992. Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests. Nord. J. Bot. 12: 427-450.
73. Trynoski, S.E. & Glime, J.M. 1982. Direction and height of bryophytes on four species of Northern trees. Bryologist 85: 281-300.
74. van Zanten, B.O. 1992. Distribution of some vulnerable epiphytic bryophytes in the north of the province of Groningen, The Netherlands. Biol. Conserv. 59: 205-209.
75. Vána, J. 1992. Endangered bryophytes in Czecoslovakia - causes and present status. Biol. Conserv. 59: 215-218.
76. Volpers, T. 1989. Changes in microclimate and vegetation after thinning in a montane virgin forest. Phytocoenologia 17: 71-104.
77. Waldheim, S. 1944. Mossvegetationen i Dalby-Söderskogs nationalpark. K. Sven. Vetenskapsakad. Avh. Naturskyddsärenden 4: 1-141.