Contribution by participants in face-to-face business meetings: Implications for collaborative technology

Journal of Systems and Information Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 15-34

  McQueen, R J ^a   Rayner, K ^a   Kock, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Face to face business meetings; Group interaction; Information giving; Interpersonal communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142725223     PISSN: 13287265     EISSN: 17588847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13287269980000742     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Ajzen, I and Fishbein, M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
2. Alavi, M. (1993) “An Assessment of Electronic meeting Systems in a Corporate Setting”. Information and Management; 25: 175-182.
3. Argote, L and McGrath, J E (1993) “Group Processes in Organizations: Continuity and Change”. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; 8: 333-389.
4. Bales, Robert F. Interaction process analysis, in Readings on the Sociology of Small Groups, Mills, Theodore M. & Rosenberg, Stan (eds), Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1970.
5. Barrick, M R., Stewart, G L., Neubert M J and Mount, M K (1998) “Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness”. Journal of Applied Psychology; 83(3): 377-391.
6. Bettenhausen, K L (1991) “Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to be Addressed”. Journal of Management; 17(2): 345-381.
7. Campion, M A., Medsker, G J and Higgs, A C (1993) “Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups”. Personnel Psychology; 46: 823-850.
8. Cappella, J N (1979) “Talk-Silence Sequences in Informal Coversations”. Human Communication Research; 6(1): 3-17.
9. Carlson, P.J. and Davis, G.B. (1998), An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From “Self” to “Other” Orientation, MIS Quarterly, V.22, No.3, pp. 335-362.
10. Chun, K J and Park, H K (1998) “Examining the Conflicting Results of GDSS Research”. Information and Management; 33: 313-325.
11. Clark, H H and Brennan, S E (1991) “Grounding in Communication”. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition
12. Connolly, T., Jessup, L M and Valacich, J S (1990) “Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups” Management Science; 36(6): 689-703.
13. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1986), Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Science, V.32, No.5, pp. 554-571.
14. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H. and Trevino, L.K. (1987), Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, V.11, No.3, pp. 355-366.
15. Diehl, M and Stroebe, W (1987) “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Towards the Solution of a Riddle” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 53(3): 497-509.
16. Dubrovsky, V J., Kiesler S and Sethna, B N (1991) “The Equalization Phenomenon: Sastus Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups”. Human-Computer Interaction; 6: 119-146.
17. Festinger, L (1950) “Informal Social Communication” Psych Review; 57(5): 271-282.
18. Finholt, T and Sproull, L S (1990) “Electronic Groups at Work”. Organization Science; 1(1)
19. Foulke, E. & Sticht, G.T. Review of research on the intelligibility and compression of accelerated speech. Psychological Bulletin (72), 1969, pp. 50-62.
20. Gallupe, R.B, DeSanctis, G. and Dickson, G.W. Computer-based support for group problem finding: an experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly (12:2), June 1988, pp. 277-296.
21. George, J F., Easton, G K., Nunamaker, J F., and Northcraft, G B. (1990) “A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support”. Information Systems Research; 1(4): 394-415.
22. Goodall, H L (1990) Small Group Communication in Organizations. Dubuque, IA: W.M.C Brown Publications
23. Gudykunst, W.B, Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., and Heyman, S. ‘The Influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles across Cultures’, Human Communication Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 510-543, 1996.
24. Guzzo, R A and Dickson, M W (1996) “Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness”. Annual Review of Psychology; 47: 307-338.
25. Hall, E. T. Beyond Culture, Doubleday, New York, 1976.
26. Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, Productivity Enhancement from Computer Mediated Communication: A Systems Contingency Approach. Communications of the ACM (31:12), 1988, pp. 1438-1454.
27. Hirokawa, R Y and Gouran, D S (1989) “Facilitation of Group Communication: A Critique of Prior Research and an Agenda for Future Research”. Management Communication Quarterly; 3(1): 71-92.
28. Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
29. Holland, Gary. Running a Business Meeting. Dell Publishing Co: New York, 1984.
30. Jay, A (1976) “How to Run a Meeting”. Harvard Business Review; 54(2): 43-57.
31. Jehn, K A and Shah. P P (1997) “Interpersonal Relationships and Task Performance: An Examination of Mediating Processes in Friendship and Acquaintance Groups”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 72(4): 775-790.
32. Kock, N. (1998) “Can Communication Medium Limitations Foster Better Group Outcomes? An Action Research Study”. Information & Management, 34(5): 295-305.
33. Lebie, L., Rhoades J A., and McGrath, J E (1996) “Interaction Process in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups”. Computer Supported Cooperative Work; 4:127-152.
34. Lee, A.S. (1994), Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation, MIS Quarterly, V.18, No.2, pp. 143-157.
35. Lengel, R.H. and Daft, R.L. (1988), The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill, Academy of Management Executive, V.2, No.3, pp. 225-232.
36. Littlepage, G., Robison, W and Reddington, K (1997) “Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes; 69(2): 133-147.
37. Markus, M.L. (1994), Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice, Organization Science, V.5, No.4, pp. 502-527.
38. Mayer, Alastair J. User friendliness at 300 baud - the CoSy approach to the human interface. Computer Conferencing and Electronic Mail Conference Proceedings, University of Guelph, Guelph Canada, 1985, pp. 23-34.
39. McCroskey, J C (1977) “Oral Communication Apprehension: A Summary of Recent Theory and Research”. Human Communication Research; 4: 78-96.
40. McKinlay, A., Procter R., Masting O., Woodburn R., and Arnott, J. (1994) “Studies of Turn-taking in Computer-Mediated Communication”. Interacting with Computers; 6(2): 151-171.
41. McQueen Robert J. and Clark, Vanessa N. (1999). Cultural Influences in Contribution to Electronic Group Communication Discussions. Research Report 99-04, Department of Management Systems, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
42. McQueen, Robert J. and Sheffield, J., Business meetings and computer conferencing: requirements for the user interface. Proceedings of the Third Guelph Symposium on Computer Mediated Communications, University of Guelph, Guelph Canada, 1990, pp. 255-268.
43. Medsker, L., Tan, M and Turban, E (1995) “Knowledge Acquisition from Multiple Experts: Problems and Issues”. Expert Systems with Applications; 9(1): 35-40.
44. Nunamaker, J F., Dennis, A R., Valacich, J S and Vogel, D R (1991a) “Information Technology for Negotiating Groups: Generating Options for Mutual Gain”. Management Science; 37(10): 1325-1346.
45. Nunamaker, J F., Dennis, A R., Valacich, J S and Vogel, D R and George, J F (1991b) “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work”. Communications of the ACM; 34(7) July: 40-61.
46. Rice, R.E. Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation. Journal of Communication (37:4), Autumn 1987, pp. 65-94.
47. Rozin, Paul & Gleitman, Lila R. The structure and acquisition of reading II: the reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle, in Toward a Psychology of Reading, A.S. Reber & D.L. Scarborough (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 1977.
48. Sproull L and Kiesler S (1991) “Increasing Personal Connections” Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Sproull, L and Kiesler, S. eds; MIT Press: 79-101.
49. Tuckman, B.W. (1970), Developmental Sequence in Small Groups, Group Processes, P.B. Smith (Ed), Penguin Books, Middlesex, UK, pp. 322-351.
50. Viller, S (1991) “The Group Facilitator: A CSCW Perspective”. Proceedings of he Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work; September 25-27.
51. Weingart, L R (1997) “How Did They Do That? The Ways and Means of Studying Group Process”. Research in Organizational Behavior; 19: 189-239.
52. Weisband, S (1994) “Overcoming Social Awareness in Computer-Supported Groups: Does Anonymity Really Help?”. Computer Supported Cooperative Work; 2: 285-297.
53. Yellen, R E., Winniford, M., and Sanford, C C. (1995) “Extraversion and Introversion in Electronically-Supported Meetings”. Information and Management; 28: 63-74.