Public participation: Relevance and application in the National Park Service

Park Science

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2000, Pages

  Tuler, Seth ^a,c   Webler, Thomas ^a,b  

^a Social and Environ Res Institute   (United States)

^b ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142720188     PISSN: 07359462     EISSN: 10909966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Bleiker, A., and H. Bleiker. 1995. Public Participation Handbook for Officials and Other Professionals Serving the Public. Ninth Edition. Institute for Participatory Management and Planning, Monterey, California.
2. Bradbury, J., and K. Branch. 1999. An evaluation of the effectiveness of local site-specific advisory boards for U.S. Department of Energy environmental restoration programs. Report PNNL-12139. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
3. Carnes, S. A., M. Schweitzer, E. B. Peelle, A. K. Wolfe, and J. F. Munro. 1998. Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the U.S. Department of Energy. Technology in Society 20(4):385-406.
4. Clark T. W., and R. L. Wallace. 1998. Understanding the human factor in endangered species recovery: an introduction to human social process. Endangered Species UPDATE 15(1):2-9.
5. Clark, T. W., R. P. Reading, and A. L. Clarke. 1994. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process. Island Press, Washington D.C.
6. Creighton, J. L., J. Delli Priscoli, C. M. Dunning, and D. B. Ayres. 1998. Public involvement and dispute resolution: a reader covering the second decade of experience at the Institute for Water Resources. IWR Report 98-R-5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia.
7. Cvetkovich, G., and T. C. Earle. 1994. The construction of justice: a case study of public participation in land management. Journal of Social Issues 50(3):161-78.
8. Dietz, T., and P. C. Stern. 1998. Science, values, and biodiversity. Bioscience June: 441-44.
9. Earle, T., and G. Cvetkovich. 1991. Platitudes and comparisons: a critique of current (wrong) directions in risk communication. Pages 449-54 in C. Zervos, editors. Risk Analysis: Prospects and opportunities. Plenum Press, New York.
10. Fiorino, D. 1990. Public participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 152:226-43.
11. Force, J. E., and K. L. Williams. 1989. A profile of National Forest planning participants. Journal of Forestry 87(1):33-38.
12. Frohmberg, E., R. Goble, V. Sanchez, and D. Quigley 1999. The assessment of radiation exposures to Native American communities from nuclear weapons testing in Nevada. Risk Analysis.
13. Gericke, K. L., J. Sullivan, and J. D. Wellman. 1992. Public participation in National Forest planning. Journal of Forestry 90(2):35-38.
14. Hartley, T. 1998. Participant competencies in deliberative discourse: cases of collaborative decision making in the U.S. EPA Superfund Program. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 28-31 May.
15. Henry Cole and Associates. 1996. Learning from success: health agency efforts to improve community involvement in communities affected by hazardous waste sites. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia.
16. Kasperson, R. E., D. Golding, and S. Tuler 1992. Siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks under conditions of high social distrust. Journal of Social Issues 48(4):161-87.
17. Kasperson, R. E. 1986. Six propositions for public participation and their relevance for risk communication. Risk Analysis 6(3):275-81.
18. Landre, B., and B. Knuth. 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources 6:229-57.
19. Lauber, B. and B. Knuth. 1997. Fairness in moose management decision-making: the citizens' perspective. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25(4):776-87.
20. Lynn, F. M. 1987. Citizen involvement in hazardous waste sites: two North Carolina success stories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 7:347-66.
21. McGrory-Klyza, C., and S. Trombulak, editors. 1994. The Future of the Northern Forests. Middlebury College Press, Middlebury, Vermont.
22. Moore, S. A. 1996. Defining 'successful' environmental dispute resolution: case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16:151-69.
23. National Research Council. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
24. Pestman, P. K. 1998. Dutch Infrastructure Policies, Public Participation, and the Environment in the 1990s: The Politics of Interfering Logics. Pages 185-202 in F. H. J. M. Coenen, D. Huitema, and L. O'Toole, editors. Participation and the Quality of Environmental Decision-making. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
25. Peters, R. G., V. T. Covello, and D. B McCallum. 1997. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Analysis 17(1):43-54.
26. Renn, O. 1998. The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management. Risk, Decision, and Policy 3(1):5-30.
27. Renn, O., T. Webler, H. Rakel, P. Dienel, and B. Johnson. 1993. Public participation in decisionmaking: a three-step procedure. Policy Sciences 26:189-214.
28. Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, editors. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Public Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
29. Renn, O. 1992. Risk communication: towards a rational discourse with the public. Journal of Hazardous Materials 29:465-519.
30. Rosenbaum, N. 1978. Public Participation and Democratic Theory. Pages 43-54 in Stuart Langton, editor. Public Participation in America. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.
31. Sarvis, W. 1994. The Mount Rogers National Forest Recreation Area and the rise of public involvement in Forest Service planning. Environmental History Review (Summer):40-65.
32. Shrader-Frechette, K. 1993. Consent and nuclear waste disposal. Public Affairs Quarterly 74:363-77.
33. Shindler, B., and K. A. Creek. 1997. Monitoring and evaluating citizen and agency interactions: framework developed for adaptive management. Report submitted to the USDA Forest Service, Cooperative Agreement #PNW 94-0584. Oregon State University, Department of Forest Resources, Portland.
34. Shindler, B., and J. Neburka. 1997. Public participation in forest planning: eight attributes of success. Journal of Forestry 95(1):17-19.
35. Taylor, J. 1998. Personal communication.
36. Tuler, S., and T. Webler. 1999. Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process. Society and Natural Resources 12:437-53.
37. Tuler, S. forthcoming. Forms of talk in policy discourse: distinguishing between adversarial and collaborative discourse. Journal of Risk Research.
38. Webler, T. 1997. Organizing public participation: a review of three handbooks. Human Ecology Review 3(1):245-54.
39. Webler, T., and S. Tuler, editors. 1998. Forum: perspectives on the U.S. National Research Council's "Understanding Risk" report. Human Ecology Review 5(1):35-66.
40. Webler, T. 1995. 'Right' discourse in public participation: an evaluative yardstick. Pages 35-86 in O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, editors. Fairness and Competence in Public Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
41. Wellman, J. D., and T. J. Tipple. 1990. Public forestry and direct democracy. The Environmental Professional 12:77-86.
42. Wiley, D. 1998. Saving whales and fishermen: a collaborative process to redesign fishing gear to protect endangered species and threatened lifestyles. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 28-31 May.