Science, values, and biodiversity

BioScience

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 441-444

  Dietz, Thomas ^a   Stern, Paul C ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031970527     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1313241     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Eads GC, Hahn RW, Lave LB, Noll RG, Portney PR, Russell M, Schmalensee R, Smith VK, Stavins RN. 1996. Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health and safety regulation? Science 272: 221-222.
2. Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1996. Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision Making. Washington (DC): Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management.
3. Cortner HH, Shannon MA. 1993. Embedding public participation in its political context. Journal of Forestry July: 14-16.
4. Costanza R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
5. Cramer JC, Dietz T, Johnston R. 1980. Social impact assessment of regional plans: A review of methods and a recommended process. Policy Sciences 12: 61-82.
6. Daily GC, ed. 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
7. Dietz T. 1984. Social impact assessment as a tool for rangelands management. Pages 1613-1634 in National Research Council, ed. Developing Strategies for Rangelands Management. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.
8. _. 1987. Theory and method in social impact assessment. Sociological Inquiry 57: 54-69.
9. _. 1988. Social impact assessment as applied human ecology: Integrating theory and method. Pages 220-227 in Borden R, Jacobs J, Young GR, eds. Human Ecology: Research and Applications. College Park (MD): Society for Human Ecology.
10. _. 1994. "What should we do?" Human ecology and collective decision making. Human Ecology Review 1: 301-309.
11. Dietz T, Stern PC. 1995. Toward realistic models of individual choice. Journal of Socio-Economics 24: 261-279.
12. Dietz T, Frey RS, Rosa EA. In press. Risk, technology and society. In Dunlap RE, Michelson W, eds. Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Westport (CT): Greenwood Press.
13. [EPA] Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency. Publication no. EPA/630/R-92/001.
14. _. 1996. Proposed guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency. Publication no. EPA/630/R-95/002.
15. Fischhoff B. 1991. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? American Psychologist 46: 835-847.
16. Freeman III AM. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington (DC): Resources for the Future.
17. Freeman DM. 1992. Choice Against Choice: Constructing A Policy-Assessing Sociology for Social Development. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado.
18. Freudenburg WR 1993. Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor and the rationality of risk perceptions. Social Forces 71: 909-932.
19. Gouldner LH, Kennedy D. 1997. Valuing ecosystem services: Philosophical bases and empirical methods. Pages 23-47 in Daily GC, ed. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
20. Harwell MA, Harwell CC, Weinstein DA, Kelly JR. 1990. Characterizing ecosystem responses to stress. Pages 91-115 in Cowling EB, Breymeyer AI, Phillips AS, Auerback SI, Bartuska AM, Harwell MA, eds. Ecological Risks: Perspectives from Poland and the United States. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
21. Harwell MA, Long JF, Bartuska AM, Gentile JH, Harwell CC, Myers V, Ogden JC. 1996. Ecosystem management to achieve ecological sustainability: The case of South Florida. Environmental Management 20: 497-521.
22. Kiester AR. 1996-1997. Aesthetics of biological diversity. Human Ecology Review 3: 151-157.
23. Maki AW. 1997. A framework for assessing the value of ecosystems to humans. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis; 8 December 1997, Washington, DC.
24. National Environmental Justice Advisory Committee. 1996. The model plan for public participation. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency.
25. [NRC] National Research Council. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
26. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. 1992. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87-131.
27. Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P, eds. 1995. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Slovic P, Layman M, Clary BB. 1993. Perceived risk, trust and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Pages 64-86 in Dunlap RE, Kraft ME, Rosa EA, eds. Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
29. Stern PC. 1991. Learning through conflict: A realistic approach to risk communication. Policy Sciences 24: 99-119.
30. Stern PC, Dietz T. 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50: 65-84.