Self-study: The fifth commonplace

Australian Journal of Education

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 199-211

  Clarke, Anthony ^a   Erickson, Gaalen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Classroom environment; Curriculum; Reflective teaching; Self evaluation (individuals); Teacher education; Teaching process

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142702097     PISSN: 00049441     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000494410404800208     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
2. Brock, P. (2000). Standards of professional practice for accomplished teaching in Australian classrooms: A national discussion paper. Canberra: Australian College of Education, Australian Curriculum Studies Association and Australian Association for Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.austcolled.com.au/dispaper.pdf
3. Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. L. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Brown J. (2001). The definition of a profession. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
5. Bullough, R. & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13-21.
6. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
7. Clarke, A. (2001). The landscape of teacher education: Critical points and possible conjectures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 599-611.
8. Clarke, A. & Erickson, G. (2003). Teacher inquiry: A defining feature of professional practice. In A. Clarke & G. Erickson (Eds.), Teacher inquiry: Living the research in everyday practice (pp. 1-7). New York: Roudedge-Falmer.
9. Clarke, A. & Erickson, G. (in press). The nature of teaching and learning in self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. L. Russell, (Eds.), The international handbook of self-study of teaching practices (Vols. 1-2, pp. 41-67). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Cole, A. L. & McIntyre, M. (2001). Dance me to an undemanding of teaching: A performative text. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 17(2), 43-60.
12. Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge and the modes of knowing: Relevance for teaching and learning. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (pp. 174-198). National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy, and narrative units in the story of teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(4), 293-310.
14. Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
15. Dyck, P. (1997). Reading and writing the commonplace: Literary culture then and now. (Re)Soundings, 1(1), Retrieved from http://www.millersv.edu/ ~resound/*vol1iss1/topframe.html
16. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
17. Fenstermacher, G. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 3-56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer Press.
19. General Teaching Council. (2002). Professional standards. Retrieved from http://www.gtce.org.uk/gtcinfo/code.asp
20. Gordon, D. (1994). Teaching as a profession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Publishing Group.
21. Grimmett, P. P. & MacKinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 385-456). Washington, DC: AERA.
22. Hamilton, M. (1998). Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education, London: Falmer Press.
23. Hamilton, M. & Pinnegar, S. (1998) The value and promise of self-study. In M. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice, (pp. 235-246). London: Falmer Press.
24. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice, 6(2), 151-182.
25. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Lechner, J. M. (1962). Renaissance concepts of the commonplaces. New York: Pageant.
27. Leggo, C. (2002). A calling of circles: Ruminations on living the research in everyday practice. Networks: On-line Journal for Teacher Research, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/~ctd/networks/journal/Vol205(1) .2002march/index.html
28. Lewison, M. (2003) Teacher inquiry. In E. P. St. John, S. A. Loescher, & J. S. Bardzell (Eds.), Improving early reading and literacy in Grades 1-5: A resource guide for programs that work (pp. 95-109) Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29. Loughran, J. J. (2003). Exploring the nature of teacher research. In A. Clarke & G. Erickson (Eds.), Teacher inquiry: Living the research in everyday practice (pp. 181-189). New York: Routledge-Falmer.
30. Loughran, J. J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. L. (Eds.). (2004). The international handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vols. 1-2). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Loughran, J., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (Eds.). (2002). Learning from teacher research. New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Loughran, J. J. & Russell, T. L. (Eds.). (2002). Improving teacher education practices through self-study. London: Routledge-Falmer.
33. Meek, A. (1988). On teaching as a profession: A conversation with Linda Darling-Hammond. Educational Leadership, 46(3), 11-17.
34. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2002). National Board certification. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/ nat_board_certification/
35. Nolan, J. & Huber, T. (1989). Nurturing the reflective practitioner through instructional supervision: A review of the literature. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(2), 126-145.
36. Pritchard, I. (2001). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3-13.
37. Sachs, J. (1997). Reclaiming the agenda of teacher professionalism: An Australian experience. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(3), 264-277.
38. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
39. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Schön, D. (1988). Coaching reflective teaching. In P. Grimmett & G. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 19-29). New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Schwab, J. J. (1978a). The practical: A language for the curriculum. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Joseph J. Schwab: Science, curriculum, and liberal education - Selected essays (pp. 287-321). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Schwab, J. J. (1978b). The practical: The arts of the eclectic. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Joseph J. Schwab: Science, curriculum, and liberal education - selected essays (pp. 322-363). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Schwab, J. J. (1978c). The practical: Translation into curriculum. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Joseph J. Schwab: Science, curriculum, and liberal education - selected essays (pp. 365-384). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Selman, M. (1988). Schön's gate is square: But is it art? In P. Grimmett & G. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 177-192). New York: Teachers College Press.
45. Shulman, L. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), The handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484-504). New York: Longman.
46. Shulman, L. (1984). The practical and the eclectic: A deliberation on teaching and educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(2), 183-200.
47. Sykes, G. (1990). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools. In R. Elmore (Ed.), Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform (pp. 59-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Weber, S. J. & Mitchell, C. A. (2004). Using visual and artistic modes of representation for self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M. L Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. L. Russell (Eds.), The international handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vols. 1-2, pp. 979-1937). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49. Westbury, I. & N. J. Wilkof. (1987). Introduction. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Joseph J. Schwab: Science, curriculum, and liberal education - selected essays (pp. 1-40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Yinger, R. J. (1990). The conversation of practice. In R. Clift, R. Houston, & M. C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice: An examination of issues and exemplars (pp. 73-94). New York: Teachers College Press.
51. Zeni, J. (2001). A guide to ethical decision making for insider research. In J. Zeni (Ed.), Ethical issues in practitioner research (pp. 153-166). New York: Teachers College Press.