Martin Shapiro and the movement from "old" to "new" institutionalist studies in public law scholarship

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2004, Pages 363-382

  Gillman, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

New institutionalism; Political jurisprudence; Political science

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142670602     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.090803.161743     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Cardozo B. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
2. Dahl R. 1957. Decision-making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as a national policymaker. J. Public Law 6:279
3. Epstein L, Knight J. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press
4. Eskridge WN Jr. 1991. Reneging on history? Playing the court/congress/president civil rights game. Calif. Law Rev. 79:613
5. Feeley MM, Rubin EL. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
6. Ferejohn J. 1999. Independent judges, dependent judiciary: explaining judicial independence. South. Calif. Law Rev. 72:353
7. Frank J. 1930. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Brentano's
8. Frymer P. 2003. Acting when elected officials won't: federal courts and civil rights enforcement in U.S. labor unions, 1935-85. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97:483
9. Gillman H. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: the Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
10. Gillman H. 2002. How political parties can use the courts to advance their agendas: federal courts in the United States, 1875-1891. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:511
11. Gillman H. 2003a. Robert G. McCloskey, historical institutionalism, and the arts of judicial governance. In The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, ed. N Maveety, pp. 336-60. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
12. Gillman H. 2003b. Judicial independence through the lens of Bush v. Gore: four lessons from political science. Ohio State Law J. 64:249
13. Graber MA. 1993. The non-majoritarian difficulty: legislative deference to the judiciary. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 7:35
14. Graber MA. 1995. The passive-aggressive virtues: Cohens v. Virginia and the problematic establishment of judicial power. Const. Comment. 12:67
15. Graber MA. 1998. Federalist or friends of Adams: the Marshall court and party politics. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 12:229
16. Griffin SM. 1998. American Constitutionalism: from Theory to Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
17. Hirschl R. 2000. The political origins of judicial empowerment through constitutionalization: lessons from four constitutional revolutions. Law Soc. Inq. 25:91-148
18. Klarman MJ. 1996. Rethinking the civil rights and civil liberties revolutions. Va. Law Rev. 82:1
19. Klarman MJ. 1997. Majoritarian judicial review: the entrenchment problem. Georgetown Law J. 85:491
20. Klarman MJ. 2000. The racial origins of modern criminal procedure. Mich. Law Rev. 99: 48
21. Klarman MJ. 2001. The white primary rulings: a case study in the consequences of Supreme Court decisionmaking. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 29:55
22. Kritzer HM. 2003. Martin Shapiro: anticipating the new institutionalism. In The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, ed. N Maveety, pp. 387-417. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
23. Lovell GI. 2003. Legislative Deferrals; Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
24. Lowi T. 1964. American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Polit. 16:677
25. Maltzman F, Spriggs J II, Wahlbeck PJ. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: the Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
26. McCann MW. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
27. McCann MW. 1996. It's only law and courts, but I like it ... Law and Courts 6:6
28. McMahon KJ. 2003. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
29. Melnick RS. 1983. Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
30. Melnick RS. 1984. Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
31. Murphy WF. 1962. Congress and the Court: a Case Study in the American Political Process, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
32. Murphy WF. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
33. Powe LA Jr. 2001. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Belknap
34. Reed DS. 2001. On Equal Terms: The Constitutional Politics of Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
35. Richards MJ, Kritzer HM. 2002. Jurisprudential regimes in Supreme Court decision making. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:305
36. Rogers JR. 2001. Information and judicial review: a signaling game of legislative-judicial interaction. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 45:84
37. Rosenberg GN. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
38. Rorty R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
39. Schubert G. 1958. The study of judicial decision-making as an aspect of political behavior. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 52:1007
40. Segal JA, Spaeth HJ. 2003. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
41. Shapiro M. 196la. Judicial modesty, political reality, and preferred position. Cornell Law Q. 47:175
42. Shapiro M. 1961b. Morals and the courts: the reluctant crusaders. Minn. Law Rev. 45:897
43. Shapiro M. 1962. Judicial modesty: Down with the old! - Up with the new? UCLA Law Rev. 10:533
44. Shapiro M. 1964a. Political jurisprudence. Ky. Law J. 52:294
45. Shapiro M. 1964b. Law and Politics in the Supreme Court: New Approaches to Political Jurisprudence. New York: Free
46. Shapiro M. 1965. Stability and change in judicial decision-making: incrementalism or stare decisis? Law Transit. Q. 2:1134
47. Shapiro M. 1968. The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. New York: Free
48. Shapiro M. 1980. Appeal. Law Soc. Rev. 14:629
49. Shapiro M. 1983. Fathers and sons: the court, the commentators, and the search for values. In The Burger Court: the Counter-Revolution That Wasn't, ed. V Blasi, pp. 218-38. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press
50. Shapiro M. 1988. Who Guards the Guardians: Judicial Control of Administrative Action. Athens: Univ. Ga. Press
51. Shapiro M. 1989. Political jurisprudence, public law, and post-consequentialist ethics: comment on Professors Barber and Smith. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 3:88
52. Shapiro M. 1990. Interest groups and Supreme Court appointments. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 84:935
53. Shapiro M. 1993. Public law and judicial politics. In Political Science: the State of the Discipline II, ed. A Finifter, pp, 365-81. Washington, DC: Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc.
54. Shapiro M, Stone Sweet A. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
55. Smith RM. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
56. Smith RM. 1988. Political jurisprudence, the "new institutionalism," and the future of public law. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82:90
57. Smith RM. 1989. The new institutionalism and normative theory: reply to Professor Barber. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 3 1989:74
58. Spiller PT, Gely R. 1992. Congressional control or judicial independence: the determinants of U.S. Supreme Court labor-relations decisions, 1949-1988. RAND J. Econ. 23:463
59. Stumpf H. 1983. Whither political jurisprudence: a symposium. West. Polit. Q. 36:533
60. Truman D. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf
61. Tushnet MV. 2003. The New Constitutional Order. Princeton, NI: Princeton Univ. Press
62. Vanberg G. 2001. Legislative-judicial relations: a game-theoretic approach to constitutional review. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 45:346
63. Whittington KE. 1999. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
64. Whittington KE. 2000. Once more unto the breach: postbehavioralist approaches to judicial politics. Law Soc. Inq. 25:601
65. Whittington KE. 2003. Legislative sanctions and the strategic environment of judicial review. ICON 1:446