An evaluation of the relative efficiency for various relevant labor markets: An empirical approach for establishing teacher salaries

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 388-405

  Young, I Phillip ^a   Delli, Dane A ^b,c   Miller Smith, Kimberly ^d   Buster, Amy ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Aptakisic Tripp School District 102   (United States)

^c LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^d SW Licking Local School District ^*  (United States)

^e CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compensation processes; Labor markets; Personnel practices; Procedural justice; Teacher salaries

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142664980     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X04264673     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Babcock, L., Wang, X., & Loewenstein, G. (1996). Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect self-serving bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXI, 1-19.
2. Castetter, W. B., & Young, I. P. (2000). The human resource function in educational administration. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Conley, S., & Gould, J. (1997). Knowledge and skill based pay through a collective bargaining lens. Educational Policy, 11(4), 403-425.
5. Copanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317-372). New York: Wiley.
6. Firestone, W. A. (1995). Resigning teacher salary systems for educational reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 549-574.
7. Futrell, M. H. (1984). Towards excellence. National Forum, 64, 11-14.
8. Gerhart, B., & Milkovich, G. T. (1992). Employee compensation: Research and practice. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 481-570). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
9. Hays, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social science. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. Heneman, H. G. (1998). Assessment of the motivational reactions of teachers to school-based performance award programs. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(1), 43-59.
11. Heneman, R. L., Porter, G., Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1997). Modeling the relationship between pay level and pay satisfaction. Journal of Bussiness and Psychology, 12(2), 147-158.
12. Jacobson, S. L. (1988). The distribution of salary increments and its effect on teacher retention. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24(2), 178-199.
13. Jacobson, S. L. (1995). Monetary incentives and the reform of teacher compensation: A persistent organizational dilemma. International Journal of Educational Reform, 4(1), 29-35.
14. Kelley, C. (1997). Teacher compensation and organization. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 15-28.
15. Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (1997). The changing structure of teacher compensation, 1970-94. Economics of Education Review, 16(4), 371-384.
16. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 626-637.
17. Milanowski, A., Odden, A., & Youngs, P. (1998). Teacher knowledge and skill assessments and teacher compensation: An overview of measurement and linkage issues. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(2), 83-101.
18. Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (1996). Compensation. Boston: Irwin.
19. Odden, A. (2000). New and better forms of teacher compensation are possible. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(5), 361-366.
20. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
21. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (2001). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
22. Wanous J. P., & Lawler, E. E. (1972). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(2), 95-105.
23. Young, I. P. (1997). Dimensions of employee compensation: Practical and theoretical implications for superintendents. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 506-525.
24. Young, I. P. (1999). Salary discrimination: A test of the paradoxical female hypothesis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 379-397.