Learning histories in simulation-based teaching: The effects on self-learning and transfer

Computers and Education

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 319-332

  Parush, A ^a   Hamm, H ^a   Shtub, A ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Interactive learning environments; Simulations; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EFFICIENCY; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; ELECTRONIC LEARNING (E-LEARNING); ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MANUFACTURING ORGANIZATIONS; ORDER FULFILLMENT PROCESS; SIMULATIONS; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 31244436470     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00043-X     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Archer, J. E., Conway, R., & Schneider, F. B. (1984). User recovery and reversal in interactive systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 6(1), 1-19.
2. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning process to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes, Vol. 2 (pp. 35- 67). Hillsdale, N.J: Earlbaum.
3. Canizares, C. A. (1997). Advantages and disadvantages of using various computer tools in electrical engineering courses. IEEE Trans. on Education, 40(3), 166-171. (Pubitemid 127761938)
4. Carroll, S., Beyerlein, S., Ford, M., & Apple, D. (1996). The Learning Assessment Journal as a tool for structured reflection in process education. Proc. Frontiers in Education'96, IEEE, 310-313.
5. Christina, R. W., & Bjork, R. A. (1991). Optimizing long-term retention and transfer. In D. Druckman, & A. Bjork (Eds.), In the mind's eye: enhancing human performance (pp. 23-56). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Cole, R., & Tooker, S. (1996). Physics To Go: Web-based tutorials for CoLoS physics simulations, Proc. Frontiers in Education '96, IEEE, 681-683.
7. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369-377.
8. Ferguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company.
9. Ginsburg, S., & Tanaka, K. (1986). Computation-tuple sequences and object histories. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 11(2), 186-212.
10. Guzdial, M., Kolodner, J., Hmelo, C., Narayanan, H., Carlso, D., Rappin, N., Hubscher, R., Turns, J., & Newstetter, W. (1996). The collaboratory notebook. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 32-33.
11. Hazemi, R., Hailes, S., & Wilbur, S. (1998). The digital university: reinventing the academy. London: Springer-Verlag.
12. Hull, C. S. (1943). The principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13. Jones, P. M., & Schneider, K. J. (1996). Learning environment for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (LEMRS): supporting apprenticeship learning in operational environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(2), 151-177.
14. Levy, G., & Baecher, G.B. NileSim: learning by experimenting. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, ASCE (in press).
15. Lu, G. B., Oveissi, M., Eckard, D., & Rubloff, G. (1996). Education in semiconductor manufacturing processes through physically-based dynamic simulation. Proc. Frontiers in Education'96, IEEE, 250-253.
16. Nahvi, M. (1997). Dynamics of student-computer interaction in a simulation environment: reflections on curricular issues. Proc. Frontiers in Education'97, IEEE.
17. Plaisant, C., Rose, A., Rubloff, G., Salter, R., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). The design of history mechanisms and their use in collaborative educational simulations. Proc. of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, CSCL' 99, Palo Alto, CA, 348-359.
18. Rose, A., Eckard, D., & Rubloff, G.W. (1998). An application framework for creating simulation-based learning environments. University of Maryland, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report CS-TR-3907, UMIACS-TR- 98-32, College Park, MD.
19. Salter, R. (1999). A client-server architecture for rich visual history interfaces, University of Maryland Computer Science Department Technical Report CS-TR-4056.
20. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualization of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
21. Shtub, A. (1997). From operations management to plant management: putting MRP/ERP systems to work. Tel Aviv (in Hebrew): Tcherikover.
22. Shtub, A. (1999). Enterprise resource planning: The dynamics of operations management. Kluwer: Norell, Massachusetts.
23. Shtub, A. (2001). Teaching operations in the enterprise resource planning (ERP) era. International Journal of Production Research, 39(3), 567-576. (Pubitemid 35165673)
24. Thimbelby, H. (1990). User interface design. New York: ACM Press/Addison Wesley.
25. Thorndike, E. L. (1914). The psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College.
26. Toriya, H., Satoh, T., Ueda, K., & Chiyokora, H. (1986). Undo and redo operations for solid modelling. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 6, 35-42.
27. Vargo, C. G., Brown, C. E., & Swierenga, S. J. (1992). An evaluation of computer-supported backtracking in a hierarchical database. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 356-360.
28. Vitter, J. S. (1984). US&R: A new framework for redoing. IEEE Software, 1(4), 39-52.
29. Yang, Y. (1988). Undo support models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28, 457-481.