Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging in men: Preliminary results

Radiology

Volumn 238, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 438-445

  Morakkabati Spitz, Nuschin ^a   Schild, Hans H ^a   Leutner, Claudia C ^a   Von Falkenhausen, Marcus ^a   Lutterbey, Götz ^a   Kühl, Christiane K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOLIPOMA; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BODY POSTURE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DUCT; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; GENDER; GYNECOMASTIA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS, MALE; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 31144470781     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382041312     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hill A, Yagmur Y, Tran KN, Bolton JS, Robson M, Borgen PI. Localized male breast carcinoma and family history: an analysis of 142 patients. Cancer 1999;86:821-82S.
2. Tukel S, Ozcan H. Mammography in men with breast cancer: review of the mammographic findings in five cases. Australas Radiol 1996;40:387-390.
3. Dershaw DD. Male mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:127-131.
4. Cappabianca S, Grassi R, D'Alessandro P, Del Vecchio A, Maioli A, Donofrio V. Metastases to the male breast from carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Radiol 2000;73:1326-1328.
5. Yang WT, Whitman GJ, Yuen EH, Tse GMK, Stelling CB. Sonographic features of primary breast cancer in men. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:413-416.
6. Gunhan-Bilgen I, Bozkaya H, Ustun EE, Memis A. Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol 2002;43:246-255.
7. Munn S. When should men undergo mammography? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1419-1420.
8. Volpe CM, Raffetto JD, Collure DW, Hoover EL, Doerr RJ. Unilateral male breast masses: cancer risk and their evaluation and management. Am Surg 1999;65:250-253.
9. Evans GF, Anthony T, Turnage RH, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of mammography in the evaluation of male breast diseases. Am J Surg 2001;181:96-100.
10. Partik B, Mallek R, Rudas M, Pokieser P, Wunderbaldinger P, Helbich TH. Malignant and benign diseases of the breast in 41 male patients: mammography, sonography and pathohistologic correlations [in German], Rofo 2001;173:1012-1018.
11. Merkle E, Muller M, Vogel J, et al. Clinical relevance of mammography in men [in German], Rofo 1996;164:7-12.
12. Bock K, Iwinska-Zelder J, Duda VF, et al. Validity of the breast imaging reporting and data system BI-RADS(TM) for clinical mammography in men [in German]. Rofo 2001;173:1019-1024.
13. Appelbaum AH, Evans GF, Levy KR, - Amirkhan RH, Schumpert TD. Mammographic appearance of male breast disease. RadioGraphics 1999;19:559-568.
14. Ciatto S, Iossa A, Bonardi R, Pacini P. Male breast carcinoma: review of a multicenter series of 150 cases. Coordinating Center and Writing Committee of FONCAM, Italy. Tumori 1990;76:555-558.
15. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003;98:468-473.
16. Harms SE. Breast Cancer Staging Working Group report. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:991-994.
17. Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, Parkin G, Lane S, Horgan K. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast Br J Surg 2002;89:1296-1301.
18. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:333-341.
19. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901-910.
20. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003;226:773-778.
21. Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Schild HH, Kuhl CK. Breast MR imaging during or soon after radiation therapy. Radiology 2003;229:893-901.
22. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:619-626.
23. Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, Parkin G, Lane S, Horgan K. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 2002;89:1296-1301.
24. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000;215:267-279.
25. Schinina V, Busi Rizzi E, Zaccarelli M, Carvelli G, Bibbolino C. Gynecomastia in male HIV patients: MR and US findings. Clin Imaging 2002;26:309-313.
26. Kuhl CK, Mielcarek P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110.
27. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:889-895.
28. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:965-974.
29. Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000;10:46-58.
30. Cardenosa G. Breast imaging companion. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001;401-412.