Private litigants and the new international courts

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 22-49

  Alter, Karen J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Courts; Delegation; Europe; International law; International organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144455347     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414005283216     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alter, K. (2005). Exporting the European court of justice model: The experience of the Andean common market court of justice. Manuscript in preparation.
2. Alter, K. J. (2001). Establishing the supremacy of European law: The making of an international rule of law in Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Alter, K. J. (2002, August). International legal systems, regime design and the shadow of international law in international relations. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference, Boston, MA.
4. Alter, K. J. (2003). Do international courts enhance compliance with international law? Review of Asian and Pacific Studies, 25, 51-78.
5. Alter, K. J., & Vargas, J. (2000). Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: EC law and U.K. gender equality policy. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4), 316-346.
6. Alvarez, J. (2003). The new dispute settlers: (Half) truths and consequences. Texas International Law Journal, 38, 405-444.
7. Arteaga, W. K. (2004). La necesidad de la integración y el orden y ordenamiento jurídico comunitario [The necessity of integration and the legal order of the community]. In Testimonio comunitario (pp. 27-86). Quito, Ecuador: Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina.
8. Bignami, F. (2005). Creating European rights: National values and supra-national interests. Columbia Journal of European Law, 11, 243-350.
9. Brown, C. (2002). The proliferation of international courts and tribunals: Finding your way through the maze. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 3, 453-475.
10. Chalmers, D. (2000, January). A statistical analysis of reported decisions of the United Kingdom invoking EU laws 1973-1998 (Jean Monnet Paper No. 1/2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School.
11. Conant, L. J. (2002). Justice contained: Law and politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12. Dragneva, R. (2004, June). Legal institutions for economic integration in the commonwealth of independent states. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Comparative Law and Economics Forum, Zurich, Switzerland.
13. Edley, C. (1990). Administrative law: Rethinking judicial control of bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound: Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Garrett, G., & Weingast, B. (1993). Ideas, interests and institutions: Constructing the EC's internal market. In J. Goldstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy (pp. 173-206). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Galaxy Books.
17. Gordon, E., Burton, S. J., Falk, R., Franck, T. M., & Nezis, C. (1989). The independence and impartiality of international judges. American Society of International Law Proceedings, 83, 508-529.
18. Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (1992). Pressure through law. London: Routledge.
20. Hathaway, O. (2001). Path dependence in the law: The course and pattern of legal change in a common law system. Iowa Law Review, 86, 603-663.
21. Hathaway, O. (2005). Between power and principle: A political theory of international law. University of Chicago Law Review, 71(2), 469-536.
22. Heifer, L., & Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law Journal, 107(2), 273-391.
23. Helfer, L., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). Why states create international tribunals: A response to professors Posner and Yoo. California Law Review, 93, 899-956.
24. Helfer, L. R. (2002). Over-legalizing human rights: International relations theory and the commonwealth Caribbean backlash against human rights regimes. Columbia Law Review, 102(7), 1832-1911.
25. Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Jackson, J. H. (1997). The great 1994 sovereignty debate: United States acceptance and implementation of the Uruguay round results. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36, 157-188.
27. Keener, E. B. (1987). The Andean common market court of justice: Its purpose, structure, and future. Emory Journal of International Dispute Resolution, 2(1), 37-72.
28. Keohane, R., Moravcsik, A., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Legalized dispute resolution: Interstate and transnational. International Organization, 54(3), 457-488.
29. Levi, W. (1976). Law and politics in the international society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Majone, G. (2001). Two logics of delegation: Agency and fiduciary relations in EU governance. European Union Politics, 2(1), 103-122.
31. Majone, G. (2003, January). Information, commitment, and the transformation of European governance. Paper presented at the Conference on "Transformations of statehood from a European perspective," Vienna, Austria.
32. McCall Smith, J. (2000). The politics of dispute settlement design. International Organization, 54(1), 137-180.
33. Milgrom, P., North, D., & Weingast, B. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 2, 1-23.
34. Mnookin, R., & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88, 950-997.
35. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Explaining international human rights regimes: Liberal theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 1(2), 157-189.
36. Noyes, J. E. (1998). The international tribunal for the law of the seas. Cornell International Law Journal, 32(1), 110-181.
37. O' Keefe, T. A. (2001). The Central American integration system (S.I.C.A.) at the dawn of a new century: Will the Central American isthmus finally be able to achieve economic and political unity? Florida Journal of International Law, 13(3), 243-261.
38. Pollard, D. E. E. (2003, August). The original jurisdiction of the Caribbean court of justice. Paper presented at the meeting of Legislative drafting facility: The thirtieth course of international law, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
39. Posner, E. A., & Yoo, J. C. (2005). A theory of international adjudication. California Law Review, 93(1), 1-72.
40. Raustiala, K. (2004). Police patrols & fire alarms in the NAAEC. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 3, 389-413.
41. Romano, C. (1999). The proliferation of international judicial bodies: The pieces of the puzzle. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 31, 709-751.
42. Schneider, A. K. (1998). Democracy and dispute resolution: Individual rights in international trade organizations. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 19, 587-638.
43. Schwartz, J. (1988). Die befolgung von Vorabentscheidungen des europäischen gerichtshofs durch deutsche gerichte [The adherence to preliminary rulings of the European Court of Justice by German Courts). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlangsgesellschaft.
44. Scott, R. E., & Stephan, P. B. (2006). The hardening of international law: Contract theory and international law enforcement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A comparative political analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Simmons, B. (2002, April). Why commit? Explaining state acceptance of international human rights obligations. Paper presented at the meeting of Delegation to International Organizations, Park City, UT.
47. Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Judicial globalization. Virginia Journal of International Law Association, 40, 1103-1124.
48. Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Slaughter, A.-M., & Bosco, D. (2000). Plaintiff's diplomacy. Foreign Affairs, 79(5), 102-116.
50. Slaughter, A.-M., Keohane, R., & Moravcsik, A. (2000). Legalized dispute resolution, interstate and transnational. International Organization, 54(3), 457-488.
51. Stone, A. (1992). Where judicial politics are legislative politics: The French constitutional council. Western European Politics, 15, 29-49.
52. Stone Sweet, A. (1999). Judicialization and the construction of governance. Comparative Political Studies, 32(2), 147-184.
53. Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Sykes, A. (2005). Public v. Private enforcement of international economic law: Of standing and remedy (John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 02/05). Chicago: Author.
55. Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609-643.
56. Tallberg, J. (2003). European governance and supranational institutions: Making states comply. London: Routledge.
57. Tallberg, J., & Jönsson, C. (1998). Compliance and post-agreement bargaining. European Journal of International Relations, 4(4), 371-408.
58. Walker, G. D. Q. (1988). The rule of law. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.