Possible metapopulation structure of the threatened butterfly Pyrgus armoricanus in Sweden

Journal of Insect Conservation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 43-51

  Öckinger, Erik ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Hesperidae; Lepidoptera; Local distribution; Patch occupancy

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DISPERSAL; ENDANGERED SPECIES; METAPOPULATION; PATCHINESS; POPULATION STRUCTURE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; PYRGUS; PYRGUS ARMORICANUS;

EID: 31044434924     PISSN: 1366638X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-005-1249-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. N. Anthes T. Fartmann G. Herrmann G. Kaule 2003. Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure - the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies J. Insect Conserv. 7 175-185. 10.1023/A:1027330422958
2. K.-O. Bergman 1999. Habitat utilization by Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) larvae and ovipositioning females: Implications for conservation Biol. Conserv. 88 69-74. 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00088-3
3. C.L. Boggs W.B. Watt P.R. Ehrlich 2003. Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
4. P.R. Christensen 2000 The effects of grazing on the butterfly fauna in Denmark Department of Zoology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus Ph.D. thesis
5. M. Clinchy D.T. Haydon A.T. Smith 2002. Pattern does not equal process: what does patch occupancy really tell us about metapopulation dynamics? Am. Nat. 159 351-362. 10.1086/338990
6. R.H.L. Dennis 1997. An inflated conservation load for European butterflies: Increases in rarity and endemism accompany increases in species richness. J. Insect Conserv. 1 43-62.
7. P.R. Ehrlich I. Hanski 2004. On the Wings of Checkerspots - A Model System for Population Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. A. Erhardt J.A. Thomas 1991. Lepidoptera as indicators of changes in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas (eds), The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats. Academic Press. London, pp. 213-237.
9. E. Fleishman C. Ray P. Sjögren-Gulve C.L. Boggs D.D. Murphy 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 16 706-716.
10. W. Forster T.A. Wohlfahrt 1976. Die Schmetterlinge Mitteleuropas. Tagfalter. Frankh'sche Verlagshandlung, Stuttgart
11. U. Gärdenfors 2000. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2000. Artdatabanken, SLU, Uppsala
12. D. Gutiérrez J.L. León-Cortés R. Menéndez R.J. Wilson M.J.R. Cowley C.D. Thomas 2001 Metapopulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus corniculatus. Ecology 82: 1371-1386.
13. D. Gutiérrez C.D. Thomas J.L. León-Cortés 1999 Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). Oecologia 121: 506-517.
14. O. Hammarstedt 1992. Conservation of butterflies in the nordic countries T. Pavlicek-van Beck A.H. Ovaa and J.G. der Made (eds.) Future of Butterflies in Europe Department of Nature Conservation, Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, pp. 16-25.
15. O. Hammarstedt 1996 Miljöövervakning av och med dagfjärilar. Länet i utveckling 1996:21 Länsstyrelseni Malmöhus län, Malmö
16. I. Hanski 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.
17. I. Hanski 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
18. I. Hanski and O.E. Gaggiotti 2004. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations Academic Press, Amsterdam
19. I. Hanski and O. Ovaskainen 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404: 755-758. 10.1038/35008063 10783887 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjtVWntbg%3D
20. I. Hanski T. Pakkala M. Kuussaari and G. Lei 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21-28.
21. H.J. Henriksen and I. Kreutzer 1982. The butterflies of Scandinavia in Nature. Skandinavisk Bogforlag, Odense
22. J.K. Hill C.D. Thomas and O.T. Lewis 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: Implications for metapopulation structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735.
23. J. Krauss I. Steffan-Dewenter and T. Tscharntke 2004. Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol. Conserv. 120: 355-361. 10.1016/ j.biocon.2004.03.007
24. A. Kruess and T. Tscharntke 2002. Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv. Biol. 16: 1570-1580. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01334.x
25. O. Kudrna 2002. The Distribution atlas of European Butterflies. Apollo Books, Stenstrup
26. J.L. León-Cortés J.J. Lennon C.D. Thomas 2003 Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 2. The role of host plant dynamics. Oikos 102: 465-477.
27. O.T. Lewis C.D. Thomas J.K. Hill M.I. Brookes T.P.R. Crane Y.A. Graneau J.L.B. Mallet and O.C. Rose 1997. Three ways of assessing metapopulation structure in the butterfly Plebejus argus Ecol. Entomol. 22: 283-293. 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.00074.x
28. A. Moilanen and M. Nieminen 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83: 1131-1145.
29. G. Nève B. Barascud R. Hughes J. Aubert H. Descimon P. Lebrun and M. Baguette 1996. Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 14-22.
30. T.R. New R.M. Pyle J.A. Thomas C.D. Thomas and P.C. Hammond 1995. Butterfly conservation management. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 40: 57-83. 10.1146/ annurev.en.40.010195.000421 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXjtVWlsbY%3D
31. E. Pollard and T.J. Yates 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London
32. A.J. Rook B. Dumont J. Isselstein K. Osoro M.F. WallisDeVries G. Parente and J. Mills 2004. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures - a review. Biol. Conserv. 119: 137-150. 10.1016/ j.biocon.2003.11.010
33. C. Schneider 2003. The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: An analysis of butterfly data. Ecol. Entomol. 28: 252-256.
34. C.B. Schultz and K.M. Dlugosch 1999. Nectar and hostplant scarcity limit populations of an endangered Oregon butterfly. Oecologia 119: 231-238.
35. R.S. Smith R.S. Shiel D. Millward and P. Corkhill 2000. The interactive effects of management on the productivity and plant community structure of an upland meadow: An 8-year field trial. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 1029-1043. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00566.x
36. M. Stoltze 1996. Danske Dagsommerfugle. Gyldendal, Copenhagen
37. M. Stoltze S. Pihl 1998. Rødliste 1997 over planter og dyr i Danmark. Miljø- og Energiministeriet, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser og Skov- og Naturstyrelsen, Copenhagen
38. C.D. Thomas and I. Hanski 2004. Metapopulation dynamics in changing environments: Butterfly responses to habitat and climate change. In: I. Hanski and O.E. Gaggiotti (eds), Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 489-514.
39. C.D. Thomas D. Jordano O.T. Lewis J.K. Hill O.L. Sutcliffe and J.A. Thomas 1999a. Butterfly distributional patterns; processes and conservation. In: G.M. Mace A. Balmford and J.R. Ginsberg (eds), Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
40. J.A. Thomas 1993. Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixt of British butterflies possess unnatural early-successional habitats. Ecography 16: 278-284.
41. J.A. Thomas N.A.D. Bourn R.T. Clarke K.E. Stewart D.J. Simcox G.S. Pearman R. Curtis and B. Goodger 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B - Biol. Sci. 268: 1791-1796. 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvnvFCqsA%3D%3D
42. J.A. Thomas R.J. Rose R.T. Clarke C.D. Thomas and N.R. Webb 1999b Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range. Funct. Ecol. 13 (Suppl. 1): S55-s64.
43. T. Tolman and R. Lewington 2004. Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins Publishers, London
44. C. Swaay van and M. Warren 1999. Red Data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg
45. N. Wahlberg T. Klemetti V. Selonen and I. Hanski 2002. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130: 33-43.
46. M.F. WallisDeVries 2004. A quantitative conservation approach for the endangered butterfly Maculinea alcon Conserv. Biol. 18: 489-499. 10.1111/ j.1523-1739.2004.00336.x
47. A.G. Young and G.M. Clarke 2000. Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge