Inheritance of high sugars from tomato accession PI 270248 and environmental variation between seasons

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 41-45

  Georgelis, N ^a   Scott, J W ^a   Baldwin, E A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Fructose; Glucose; Heritability; Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme; Solar radiation

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME;

EID: 30944445172     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.131.1.41     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baldwin, E.A., J.W. Scott, and R.L. Shewfelt. 1996. Quality differences between mutant, transgenic and commercial cultivars. Proc. Florida Tomato Inst. Univ. Florida Agr. Expt. Sta. PRO 108:23-29.
2. Baldwin, E.A., J.W. Scott, C.K. Shewmaker, and W. Schuch. 2000. Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: Biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. HortScience 35:1013-1022.
3. Brooks, R.E. and J.H MacGillivray. 1928. Studies on tomato quality II. Effect of soil moisture upon the percentage of dry matter in the fruit. J. Assn. Offic. Agr. Chem. 11(3):389-396.
4. Cavalli, L.L. 1952. An analysis of linkage of quantitative inheritance, p. 135-144. In: E.C.R. Reeve and C.H. Waddington (eds.). Quantitative inheritance. HMSO, London.
5. Chetelat, R.T., J.W. De Verna, and A.B. Bennett. 1995. Introgression into tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) of the Lycopersicon chmielewskii sucrose accumulator gene (sucr) controlling fruit sugar composition. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:327-333.
6. Conti, S., M.C. Sanguineti, B. Toni, and A. Azzoni. 1988. Inheritance of quality traits in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Euphytica 37:121-127.
7. Davies, J.N. and G.E. Hobson. 1981. The constituents of tomato fruit - The influence of environment, nutrition, and genotype. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 15:205-280.
8. Emery, G.C. and H.M. Munger. 1970. Effects of inherited differences in growth habit on fruit size and soluble solids in tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95:410-412.
9. Forshey, C.G. and E.K. Alban. 1954. Seasonal quality changes in greenhouse tomatoes. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 64:372.
10. Georgelis, N., J.W. Scott, and E.A. Baldwin. 2004. Relationship of tomato fruit sugar concentration with physical and chemical traits and linkage of RAPD markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:839-845.
11. Goldman, I.L., I. Paran, and D. Zamir. 1995. Quantitative trait locus analysis of a recombinant inbred line population derived from a Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon cheesmanii cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:925-932.
12. Hadas, R., A.A. Schaffer, D. Miron, M. Fogelman, and D. Granot. 1995. PCR-generated molecular markers for the invertase gene and sucrose accumulation in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:1142-1148.
13. 1 hybrids. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:318-321.
14. Kader, A.A., M.A. Stevens, M. Albright-Holton, L.L. Morris, and M. Agazi. 1977. Effect of fruit ripeness when picked on flavor and composition in fresh market tomatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102:724-731.
15. Lower, R.L. and A.E. Thompson. 1967. Inheritance of acidity and solids content of small-fruited tomatoes. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91:486-494.
16. Mahmud, I. and H.H. Kramer. 1951. Segregation for yield, height and maturity following a soybean cross. Agron. J. 44:605-608.
17. Malundo, T.M.M., R.L. Shewfelt, and J.W. Scott. 1995. Flavor quality of fresh market tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 6:103-110.
18. Mather, K. and J.L. Jinks. 1982. Biometrical genetics. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
19. McGillivary, J.H. and L.J. Clemente. 1956. Effect of tomato size on solids content. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68:466-469.
20. Ng, T.J. 1990. Generation means analysis by microcomputer. HortScience 25:363.
21. Olson, S.M., D.N. Maynard, G.J. Hochmuth, C.S. Vavrina, W.M. Stall, T.A. Kucharek, S.A. Webb, T.G. Taylor, S.A. Smith, and E.H. Simonne. 2004. Tomato production in Florida, p. 301-316. In: S.M. Olson and E. Simonne (eds.). Vegetable production handbook for Florida 2004-2005. Vance Publishing, Lincolnshire, Ill.
22. Saliba-Colombani, V., M. Causse, D. Langlois, J. Philouze, and M. Buret. 2001. Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. 1. Mapping QTLs physical and chemical traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:259-272.
23. Schaffer, A.A., M. Petreikov, D. Miron, M. Fogelman, M. Spiegelman, Z. Bnei-Moshe, S. Shen, D. Granot, R. Hadas, N. Dai, I. Levin, M. Bar, M. Friedman, M. Pilowsky, N. Gilboa, and L. Chen. 1998. Modification of carbohydrate content in developing tomato fruit. HortScience 34:12-15.
24. Scott, J.W. 2002. A breeder's perspective on the use of molecular techniques for improving fruit quality. HortScience 37:464-467.
25. Scott, J.W., G.C. Somodi, and J.B. Jones. 1989. Resistance to bacterial spot fruit infection in tomato. HortScience 24:825-827.
26. Stevens, M.A. 1986. Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breeding Rev. 4:273-311.
27. Stevens, M.A. 1972. Relationships between components contributing to quality variation among tomato lines. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:70-73.
28. Stevens, M.A., A.A. Kader, and M. Albright-Holton. 1979. Potential for increasing tomato flavor via increased sugar and acid content. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104:40-42.
29. Stevens, M.A., A.A. Kader, M. Albright-Holton, and M. Agazi. 1977. Genotypic variation for flavor and composition in fresh market tomatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102:680-689.
30. Stommel, J.R. and K.G. Haynes. 1993. Genetic control of fruit sugar accumulation in a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum cross. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118:859-863.
31. Warner, J.N. 1952. A method for estimating narrow-sense heritability. Agron. J. 44:427-430.
32. Wright, S. 1934. The results of crosses between inbred strains of guinea pigs differing in number of digits. Genetics 19:537-551.