Morphological and molecular concordance of Rhynchozoon clades (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) from Alaska

Invertebrate Biology

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 344-354

  Dick, Matthew H ^a   Mawatari, Shunsuke F ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

16S mitochondrial lineage; Diagnostic characters; Morphospecies; Phylogeny; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BRYOZOA; CHEILOSTOMATIDA; INVERTEBRATA; RHYNCHOZOON; RHYNCHOZOON ROSTRATUM;

EID: 30944442602     PISSN: 10778306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2005.00032.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Avise JC 2000. Phylogeography. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 447 pp.
2. Busk G 1855. Class Bryozoa. In: Catalogue of the Reigen Collection of Mazatlan Mollusca in the British Museum. Carpenter PP, ed., pp. 1-5. Warrington, London.
3. Canu F & Bassler RS 1927. Classification of the cheilostomatous Bryozoa. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 69 (14): 1-42, pl. 1.
4. Davidson SK & Haygood MG 1999. Identification of sibling species of the bryozoan Bugula neritina that produce different anticancer bryostatins and harbor distinct strains of the bacterial symbiont "Candidatus Enterobugula sertula". Biol. Bull. 196: 273-280.
5. Dick MH & Mawatari SF 2004. Resolving taxonomic problems of North Pacific bryozoans. In: Neo-Science of Natural History, Proceedings of International Symposium on Dawn of a New Natural History - Integration of Geoscience and Biodiversity Studies, March 5-6, 2004, Sapporo. Mawatari SF & Okada H, eds., pp. 67-74. COE for Neo-Science of Natural History, Sapporo, Japan.
6. Dick MH & Ross JRP 1988. Intertidal Bryozoa (Cheilostomata) of the Kodiak vicinity, Alaska. Cntr. NW Stud. Occ. Pap. 23: 1-133.
7. Dick MH, Freeland JR, Williams LP, & Coggeshall-Burr M 2000. Use of 16S mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences to investigate sister-group relationships among gymnolaemate bryozoans. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Bryozoology Association Conference. Herrera Cubilla A & Jackson JBC, eds., pp. 197-210. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama.
8. Dick MH, Herrera-Cubilla A, & Jackson JBC 2003. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of free-living Bryozoa (Cupuladriidae) from both sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27: 355-371.
9. Freeland JR, Noble LR, & Okamura B 2000a. Genetic diversity of North American populations of Cristatella mucedo, inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1375-1389.
10. Freeland JR, Romualdi C, & Okamura B 2000b. Gene flow and genetic diversity: a comparison of freshwater bryozoan populations in Europe and North America. Heredity 85: 498-508.
11. Gordon DP 1999. Bryozoan diversity in New Zealand and Australia. In: The other 99%. The Conservation and Biodiversity of Invertebrates. Ponder W & Lunney D, eds., pp. 199-204. Transactions of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman.
12. Hageman SJ, Bayer M, & Todd CD 2002. Partitioning phenotypic variation: implications for morphometric analyses (Bryozoa). In: Bryozoan Studies 2001. Wyse Jackson PN, Butler CJ, & Spencer Jones ME, eds., pp. 131-140. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Lisse.
13. Halanych KM, Bacheller JD, Aguinaldo AMA, Liva SM, Hillis DM, & Lake JA 1995. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267: 1641-1643.
14. Hao J, Xia F, & Yang Q 2001. The origin and systematics of Bryozoa: a new synthesis on morphological and molecular evidence. Acta Micropalaeontol. Sinica 18: 385-391.
15. Hao J, Yang Q, Li C, Zhang K, & Sun X 2002. Preliminary study on molecular phylogeny of bryozoans based on 18S rRNA gene sequences. Acta Micropalaeontol. Sinica 19: 199-205.
16. Harasewych MG & Tillier S, eds. 1994. Molecular techniques and molluscan phylogeny. Nautilus 108 (Suppl. 2): 1-174.
17. Harrison RG 1991. Molecular changes at speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 281-308.
18. Hastings AB 1930. Cheilostomatous Polyzoa from the vicinity of the Panama Canal collected by Dr. C. Crossland on the cruise of the S.Y. 'St. George.' Proc. Zool. Soc. London, from 1929, No. 47: 697-740, pls. 1-17.
19. Hayward PJ & Ryland JS 1999. Cheilostomatous Bryozoa, part 2, Hippothooidea - Celleporoidea. Synopses British Fauna 14, 2nd ed. pp. i-vii, 1-416. Field Studies Council, Shrewsbury, UK.
20. Hincks T 1882. Polyzoa of the Queen Charlotte Islands: preliminary notice of new species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 10 (Ser. 5): 248-256.
21. _ 1883. Report on the Polyozoa of the Queen Charlotte Islands. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 11 (Ser. 5): 442-451, pls. 17-18.
22. Hoare K, Goldson J, Giannasi N, & Hughes RN 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the cosmopolitan bryozoan Celleporella hyalina: cryptic speciation? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18: 488-492.
23. Horowitz AS & Pachut JF 2000. The fossil record of bryozoan species diversity. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Bryozoology Association Conference. Herrera Cubilla A & Jackson JBC, eds., pp. 245-248. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama.
24. Jackson JBC & Cheetham AH 1990. Evolutionary significance of morphospecies: a test with cheilostome Bryozoa. Science 248: 579-583.
25. Johnston G 1847. A History of the British Zoophytes. 2nd ed., 2 Vols., John Van Voorst, London. 488 pp., pls. 1-73.
26. Knowlton N 2000. Molecular genetic analyses of species boundaries in the sea. Hydrobiologia 420: 73-90.
27. Mackey LY, Winnepenninckx B, De Wachter R, Backeljau T, Emschermann P, & Garey JR 1996. 18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta. J. Mol. Evol. 42: 552-559.
28. Mackie JA, Keough MJ, Norman JA, & Christidis L 2002. Mitochondrial evidence of geographical isolation within Bugula dentata Lamouroux. In: Bryozoan Studies 2001. Wyse Jackson PN, Buttler CJ, & Spencer Jones ME, eds., pp. 199-205. A.A. Balkema Publsihers, Lisse.
29. McCain KW & Ross JRP 1974. Annotated faunal list of cheilostome Ectoprocta of Washington State. Northwest Sci. 48: 9-16.
30. McGovern TM & Hellberg ME 2003. Cryptic species, cryptic endosymbionts, and geographical variation in chemical defences in the bryozoan Bugula neritina. Mol. Ecol. 12: 1207-1215.
31. O'Dea A & Okamura B 2000. Cheilostome bryozoans as indicators of seasonality in the Neogene epicontinental seas of western Europe. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Bryozoology Association Conference. Herrera Cubilla A & Jackson JBC, eds., pp. 316-320. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama.
32. O'Donoghue CH & O'Donoghue E 1923. A preliminary list of Polyzoa (Bryozoa) from the Vancouver Island region. Contr. Canad. Biol., N.S. 1: 145-201, pls. 1-4.
33. _ 1926. A second list of Bryozoa (Polyzoa) from the Vancouver Island Region. Contr. Canad. Biol. Fish., N.S. 3: 49-131, pls. 1-5.
34. Osburn RC 1952. Bryozoa of the Pacific coast of America, Part 2, Cheilostomata-Ascophora. Allan Hancock Pac. Exped. 14: 271-611, pls. 30-64.
35. Porter JS, Hayward PJ, & Spencer Jones ME 2001. The identity of Alcyonidium diaphanum (Bryozoa: Ctenostomida). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 81: 1001-1008.
36. Robertson A 1908. The incrusting chilostomatous Bryozoa of the west coast of North America. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Zool. 4: 253-344, pls. 14-24.
37. Schäfer P, Bader B, & Nikulina E 2003. Growth pattern and life cycles of the bryozoan Flustra foliacea: a comparison of North Sea and Baltic Sea populations. Bol. Soc. Bio. Concepcion 24: 107 (Abstract).
38. Schwaninger HP 1999. Population structure of the widely dispersing marine bryozoan Membranipora membranacea (Cheilostomata): implications for population history, biogeography, and taxonomy. Mar. Biol. 135: 411-423.
39. Smith EJ, Smith GE, & Shi L 2001. Small bones from dried mammal museum specimens as a reliable source of DNA. BioTechniques 30: 732-736.
40. Soule DF & Soule JD 1964. The Ectoprocta (Bryozoa) of Scammon's Lagoon, Baja California, Mexico. Amer. Mus. Novitat. 2199: 1-36.
41. Swofford DL 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
42. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, & Gibson TJ 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.