Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between USG and MRCP in biliary and pancreatic pathology

Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 177-181

  Bhatt, Chhaya ^a   Shah, P S ^a   Prajapati, H J ^a   Modi, J ^a  

^a VS Hospital   (India)

Author keywords

Biliary pathologies; MRCP; Pancreatic lesions; USG

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILE DUCT TUMOR; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; CHILD; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT CYST; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; PANCREAS DISEASE;

EID: 30944432562     PISSN: 09713026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.28796     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Barish M A, Yuces E H, Soto J A et al. 1995 M R Cholangiography: Efficiency of three-dimentional turbo spin echo technique: Am J Roentgenol 165 : 295-300.
2. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196:459-464.
3. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T et al. (1992) Biliary obstruction evaluation with 3 dimensional MRCP. Radiology 183:578-580.
4. Baron RL: Common bile duct stones. Reassesment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 162:419-424, 1987.
5. Baron RL: Computed tomography of the biliary tree. Radiologic Clin North America 29(6) 1235-1250, 1991.
6. Matthew A Barish, E. Kent Yucel and Joseph T. ferrucci, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography. The New England J Of Medicine July 22 1999;341:258-264.
7. Wallner BK, Schumacher K.A. Weidenmaier W. Fariedrich jm (1991) Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR Cholangiography with a T2 weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 181:805-808.
8. Hiroyuki Irie, MD., Hiroshi Honda, MD., et al. Optimal MR Cholangiopancreatographic Sequence and Its Clinical Application. Radiology 1998; 206 : 379-38.
9. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-597.
10. Joseph Romagnuolo, Marc Bardou, Elham Rahme, et al. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:547-557.
11. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, et al. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin Radiol 1999 Aug; 54(8):513-20.
12. Alcaraz MJ, De la Morena EJ, Polo A, et al. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2000 Jul;92(7):427-38.