Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 341, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 258-264

  Barish, Matthew A ^a   Yucel, E Kent ^a   Ferrucci, Joseph T ^a  

^a BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CANCER; COST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; PANCREAS CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT;

BILE DUCTS; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC DUCTS;

EID: 0033595137     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199907223410407     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2 weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;181:805-8.
2. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR. cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998;207:21-32.
3. Lee MG, Lee HJ, Kim MH, et al. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997;202:663-9.
4. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:295-300.
5. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995;197:109-15.
6. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-97.
7. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Setijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breathhold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995;196:227-32.
8. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1994;192:73-8.
9. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995;196:459-64.
10. Matos C, Metens T, Devière J, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997;203:435-41.
11. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:847-50.
12. Chan Y-L, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopie retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996;200:85-9.
13. Rigan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Magnuson T. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1441-5.
14. Gross BH, Harter LP, Gore RM, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1983;146:471-4.
15. Cronan JJ, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, et al. Prospective diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Radiology 1983;146:467-9.
16. Laing FC, Jeffrey RB Jr. Choledocholithiasis and cystic duct obstruction: difficult ultrasonographic diagnosis. Radiology 1983;146:475-9.
17. Jeffrey RB, Federle MP, Laing FC, Wall S, Rego J, Moss AA. Computed tomography of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:1179-83.
18. Baron RL, Stanley RJ, Lee JKT, Koehler RE, Levitt RG. Computed tomographic features of biliary obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:1173-8.
19. David V, Reinhold C, Hochman M, et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1055-9.
20. Cranley B, Logan H. Exploration of the common bile duct - the relevance of the clinical picture and the importance of preoperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 1989;67:869-72.
21. Philips EH. Controversies in the management of common duct calculi. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74:931-48.
22. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314-20.
23. Silvis SE, Ansel HJ. Endoscopie retrograde cholangiography: application in biliary tract disease. In: Berk JE, ed. Bockus gastroenterology. 4th ed. Vol. 6. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1985:3569-80.
24. Rieger R, Wayand W. Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Gastrointest Endose 1995;42:6-12.
25. Dowsett JF, Polydorou AA, Vaira D, et al. Needle knife papillotomy: how safe and how effective? Gut 1990;31:905-8.
26. Hamilton I, Lintott DJ, Rothwell J, Axon ATR. Acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Radiol 1983;34:543-6.
27. Thoeni RF, Fell SC, Goldberg HI. CT detection of asymptomatic pan-creatitis following ERCP. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:291-5.
28. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996;199:91-8.
29. Forbes A, Cotton PB. ERCP and sphincterotomy after Billroth II gastrectomy. Gut 1984;25:971-4.
30. Osnes M, Rosseland AR, Aabakken L. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic papillotomy in patients with a previous Billroth-II resection. Gut 1986;27:1193-8.
31. Cunningham JT. Endoscopic papillotomy and stent insertion: B-II technique and limitations. In: Barkin JS, O'Phelan CA, eds. Advanced therapeutic endoscopy. New York: Raven Press, 1990:193-200.
32. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Broglia L, Messina A, Passariello R. Three-dimensional MR cholangiography: a unique diagnostic procedure for evaluation of bile ducts in patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis. Radiology 1995;197:Suppl:312. abstract.
33. Lehman GA, Sherman S. Pancreas divisum: diagnosis, clinical significance, and management alternatives. Gastrointcst Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:145-70.
34. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, Guibaud L, Atri M, Barkun AN. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996;199:99-103.
35. Ernst O, Asselah T, Sergent G, et al. MR cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1027-30.
36. Ernst O, Asselah T, Talbodec N, Sergent G. MR cholangiopancreatography: a promising new tool for diagnosing primary sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1115-6.
37. Onaya H, Itai Y, Niitsu M, Chiba T, Michishita N, Saida Y. Ductectatic mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:171-7.
38. Koito K, Namieno T, Ichimura T, et al. Mucin-producing pancreatic tumors: comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1998;208:231-7.
39. Yamataka A, Kuwatsuru R, Shima H, et al. Initial experience with non-breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of choledochal cyst in children. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:1560-2.
40. Guibaud L, Lachaud A, Touraine R, et al. MR cholangiography in neonates and infants: feasibility and preliminary applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:27-31.