Virtual integration with a multi-criteria partner selection model for the multi-echelon manufacturing system

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 793-802

  Sha, D Y ^a   Che, Z H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Partner selection; Production distribution planning; Virtual enterprise; Virtual integration

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MANUFACTURING DATA PROCESSING; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION CONTROL; RAW MATERIALS;

PARTNER SELECTION; PRODUCTION-DISTRIBUTION PLANNING; VIRTUAL ENTERPRISE; VIRTUAL INTEGRATION;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 17444380863     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1891-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Davulcu H, Kifer M, Pokorny LR, Dawson S (1999) Modeling and analysis of interactions in virtual enterprises. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Research Issues on Data Engineering. Information Technology for Virtual Enterprises, Sydney, Australia, pp 12-18
2. Ip WH, Huang M, Yung KL, Wang D (2003) Genetic algorithm solution for a risk-based partner selection problem in a virtual enterprise. Comput Oper Res 30:213-231
3. Wallon J, Whicker L (1996) Virtual enterprise: Myth and reality. J Control 22(8):22-25
4. Song L, Nagi R (1997) Design and implementation of a virtual information system for agile manufacturing. IIE Trans 29:839-857
5. Christopher MG (1992) Logistics and supply chain management: strategies for reducing costs and improving services. Pitman, London
6. Korhoren P, Huttunen K, Eloranta E (1998) Demand chain management in global enterprise-information management view. Prod Plan Control 9:526-531
7. Davis M, O'Sullivan D (1999) Systems design framework for the extended enterprise. Prod Plan Control 10:3-18
8. Talluri S, Baker R, Sarkis J (1999) A framework for designing efficient value chain networks. Int J Prod Econ 62:133-144
9. Papazoglou M, Ribbers P, Tsalgatidou A (2000) Integrated value chains and their applications from a business and technology standpoint. Decis Support Syst 29:323-342
10. Mikhailov L (2002) Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega 30:393-401
11. Weber CA, Desai A (1996) Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers. Eur J Oper Res 90:142-155
12. Wang D, Ip WH, Yung KL (2001) A heuristic genetic algorithm for subcontractor selection in a global manufacturing environment. IEEE T Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 31(2): 189-198
13. Muralidharan C, Anatharaman N, Deshmukh SG (2002) A multicriteria group decision making model for supplier rating. J Supply Chain Manage 38(4):22-33
14. Cavusgil ST, Yeoh PL, Mitri M (1995) Selecting foreign distributors: An expert systems approach. Ind Market Manage 24:297-304
15. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Saaty TL (1983) Priority setting in complex problems. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 30(2): 140-155
17. Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):2-8
18. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York
19. Korpela J, Lehmusvaara A, Tuominen M (1998) Customer service based design of the supply chain. Pre-Prints of the Tenth International Working Seminar on Production Economics 2:161-174
20. Korpela J, Lehmusvaara A (1999) A customer-oriented approach to warehouse network evaluation and design. Int J Prod Econ 59:135-146
21. Korpela J, Lehmusvaara A, Tuominen M (1999) An integrated approach for truck carrier selection. Int J Logist Res Appl 2(1):5-20
22. Walls MR, Dyer JS (1996) Risk propensity and firm performance: a study of the petroleum exploration industry. Manage Sci 42(6): 1004-1021
23. Kumar J, Sheble G (1997) A decision analysis approach to the transaction selection problem in a competitive electric market. Electr Power Syst Res 38:209-216
24. Nepomuceno F, Suslick SB, Walls MR (1999) Investment and technology decision model in offshore oil exploration in Brazil: a decision analysis using multi-attribute utility theory. Nat Resour Res J Int Math Geol 8(2): 193-203
25. Saaty TL (1982) Decision making for leaders. Lifetime Learning, New York
26. Golden BL, Harker PT, Wasil EE (1989) The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York