Category representation for classification and feature inference

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1433-1458

  Johansen, Mark K ^a,b   Kruschke, John K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Categorization; Category learning; Category representation; Classification and versus inference learning; Predictive inference

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY;

HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 30544455340     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1433     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
2. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., & Lee, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity-choice model. Psychological Science, 5, 144-151.
3. Blair, M., & Homa, D. (2003). As easy to memorize as they are to classify: The 5-4 categories and the category advantage. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1293-1301.
4. Chin-Parker, S., & Ross, B. (2004). Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: A comparison of inference learning and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 216-226.
5. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
6. Estes, W. K. (1986). Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500-549.
7. Gelman, S., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183-209.
8. Gelman, S., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children's inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532-1541.
9. Johansen, M. K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning? Cognitive Psychology, 45, 482-553.
10. Kruschke, J. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
11. Kruschke, J. K., Johansen, M. K., & Blair, N. J. (1999). Exemplar model account of inference learning: Commentary on Yamauchi and Markman (1998) [Unpublished manuscript]. (Available from http://www.indiana.edu/~kruschke/ yamauchicomment.html)
12. Loose, J., & Mareschal, D. (1999). Inductive reasoning revisited: Children's reliance on category labels and appearance. In Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 320-325). London: Erlbaum.
13. Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309-332.
14. Maddox, W. T. (1999). On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 354-375.
15. Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.
16. Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592-613.
17. Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 3, 333-352.
18. Medin, D. L., Dewey, G. I., & Murphy, T. D. (1983). Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 607-625.
19. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
20. Medin, D. L., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1981). Linear separability in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355-368.
21. Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241-253.
22. Myung, I. J. (1997, August). The importance of complexity in model selection. Methods for Model Selection Symposium, Indiana University Bloomington.
23. Nsofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
24. Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87-109.
25. Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Exemplars, prototypes and similarity rules. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to connectionist theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 149-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Nosofsky, R. M. (1998). Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: Reply to Maddox and Ashby (1998). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 322-339.
27. Nosofsky, R. M. (2000). Exemplar representation without generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda's (2000) "Thirty Categorization Results in Search of a Model." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1735-1743.
28. Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C., & Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory & Cognition, 22, 352-369.
29. Nosofsky, R. M., & Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 375-402.
30. Nosofsky, R. M., & Kruschke, J. K. (1992). Investigations of an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 28, 207-250.
31. Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., & McKinley, S. C. (1992). Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 221-233.
32. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
33. Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2002). Exemplar and prototype models revisited: Response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 924-940.
34. Palmeri, T. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 548-568.
35. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (2000). Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 3-27.
36. Vandierendonck, A. (1995). A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 442-459.
37. Yamauchi, T. (2003). Dual processes in the acquisition of categorical concepts. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1259-1264). Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
38. Yamauchi, T., Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2002). Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 585-593.
39. Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (1998). Category learning by inference and classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 124-148.
40. Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (2000). Inference using categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 776-795.