The Influence of Evaluation on Changing Management Systems in Educational Institutions

Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 463-479

  Rebolloso, Enrique ^a   Fernández Ramírez, Baltasar ^a   Cantón, Pilar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

evaluation influence; institutional evaluation; organizational change; participative evaluation; school management

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444445574     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005060263     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Cantón, P. (2002) ‘Evaluación de la calidad en instituciones de enseñanza infantil y primaria’ (Evaluation of Quality in Infant and Primary Schools). Universidad de Almería, unpublished manuscript.
2. Chelimsky, E. (1983) ‘The Definition and Measurement of Evaluation Quality as a Management Tool’, New Directions for Program Evaluation 18: 113-126.
3. Chelimsky, E. (1997) ‘The Coming Transformations in Evaluation’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, pp. 1-26. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. Cook, T. D., L. C. Leviton and W. R. Shadish (1985) ‘Program Evaluation’, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 699-777. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. Cousins, J. B. and E. Whitmore (1998) ‘Framing Participatory Evaluation’, New Directions for Evaluation 80: 5-23.
6. Cracknell, B. E. (2001) ‘The Role of Aid-Evaluation Feedback as an Input into the Learning Organization’, Evaluation 7(1): 132-145.
7. Cronbach, L. J., et al. (1980) Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Cummings, T. G. and C. G. Worley (1993) Organizational Development and Change. St Paul, MN: West.
9. Dale, B. G. and H. Bunney (1999) Total Quality Management Blueprint. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Deutsch, M. (1969) ‘Socially Relevant Science: Reflections on Some Studies of Interpersonal Conflict’, American Psychologist 24(12): 1076-1092.
11. DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.
12. Downey, C. J., L. E. Frase and J. J. Peters (1994) The Quality Education Challenge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13. English, F. and J. C. Hill (1994) Total Quality Education: Transforming School into Places. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. European Commission for Higher Education (1998) Recommendation of the Commission in Relation to the European Cooperation on Quality Assurance in Higher Education. COM(97) 707 final. Brussels: Document 97/0121 (SYN).
15. European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) (1996-7) Autoevaluación: Directrices para el sector público (Self-Evaluation: Guidelines for the Public Administration). Madrid: Club de Gestión de la Calidad.
16. Fetterman, D. (1994) ‘Empowerment Evaluation’, Evaluation Practice 15(1): 1-15.
17. Fetterman, D. M. (1997) ‘Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation in Higher Education’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, pp. 381-395. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18. Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. and L. L. Morris (1987) How to Design a Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
19. French, W. L. and C. H. Bell (1990) Organization Development: Behavioral Science Intervention for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Fuqua, D. R. and D. J. Kurpius (1993) ‘Conceptual Models in Organizational Consultation’, Journal of Counseling and Development (July/August): 607-618.
21. Gray, J., D. Reynolds, C. Fitz-Gibbon and D. Jesson, eds (1996) Emerging Traditions: The Future of Research on School Effectiveness and School Improvement. London: Cassell.
22. Greene, J. C. (1988a) ‘Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation’, Evaluation Review 12(2): 91-116.
23. Greene, J. C. (1988b) ‘Communication of Results and Utilization in Participatory Program Evaluation’, Evaluation and Program Planning 11(4): 341-351.
24. Greene, J. C., L. Benjamin and L. Goodyear (2001) ‘The Merits of Mixing Methods in Evaluation’, Evaluation 7(1): 25-44.
25. Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
26. Hansen, H. F. and F. Borum (1999) ‘The Construction and Standardization of Evaluation: The Case of the Danish University Sector’, Evaluation 5(3): 303-329.
27. Hargreaves, D. and D. Hopkins (1993) ‘School Effectiveness, School Improvement and Development Planning’, in M. Preedy (ed.) Managing the Effective School, pp. 229-240. London: Open University/Paul Chapman.
28. Hill, J. C. (1992) The New American School. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
29. House, E. and K. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30. Hubbard, D. L. (1994) ‘Can Higher Education Learn from Factories?’, Quality Progress 12: 93-97.
31. Kilmann, R. H., M. J. Saxton and R. Sherpa (1985) ‘Introduction: Five Key Issues in Understanding and Changing Culture’, in R. H. Kilmann, M. J. Saxton and R. Sherpa (eds) Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32. Kirkhart, K. E. (2000) ‘Reconceptualizing Evaluation Use: An Integrated Theory of Influence’, New Directions for Evaluation 88: 5-23.
33. LOGSE (1995) Ley Orgánica 1/1990, de 3 de Octubre, de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo (Organic Law 1/1990, 3 October, of General Ordering of the Educational System). Available at: http://www.filosofia.org/mfa/fae990a.htm (site visited: 12 October 2005).
34. LOPEG (1995) Ley Orgánica 9/1995, de 20 de Noviembre, de Participación, Evaluación y Gobierno de los Centros Educativos (Organic Law 9/1995, 20 November, of Participation, Evaluation and Government of Educational Centres). Available at: http://www.ceapa.es/textos/legislacion/lopeg.htm (site visited: 12 October 2005).
35. LOU (2001) Ley Orgánica 6/2001, de 21 de diciembre, de Universidades (Organic Law 6/2001, 21 December, of Universities). Available at: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2001-12-24/pdfs/A49400-49425.pdf (site visited: 12 October 2005).
36. LRU (1983) Ley Orgánica 11/1983, de 25 de Agosto, de Reforma Universitaria (Organic Law 11/1983, 25 August, of University Reform). Available at: http://www.ucm.es/info/DAP/pr4/datos/legislacion/lru.htm (site visited: 12 October 2005).
37. McKerman, J. (1986) Curriculum Action Research, 2nd edn. London: Kogan Page.
38. Middlewood, D. and J. Lumby, eds (1998) Strategic Management in School and College. London: Chapman.
39. Nadler, D. A. and M. I. Tushman (1993) ‘Organizational Frame Bending Principles for Managing Reorientation’, Academy of Management Executive (Feb.): 7-21.
40. Nevo, D. (1990) ‘The Role of the Evaluator’, in H. Walber and G. Haertel (eds) International Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation, pp. 89-91. Oxford: Pergamon.
41. Nevo, D. (1994) ‘Combining Internal and External Evaluation: A Case for School-Based Evaluation’, Studies in Educational Evaluation 20(1): 87-98.
42. Nevo, D. (1995) School-Based Evaluation: A Dialogue for School Improvement. Oxford: Pergamon.
43. O'Hara, J. and G. McNamara (2001) ‘Process and Product Issues in the Evaluation of School Development Planning’, Evaluation 7(1): 99-109.
44. Owens, R. G. (1998) Organizational Behavior in Education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Patton, M. Q. (1997) Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46. Patton, M. Q. (1998) ‘Discovering Process Use’, Evaluation 4(2): 225-233.
47. Pfeffer, J. (1998) ‘Understanding Organizations: Concepts and Controversies’, in D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 733-777. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
48. PNECU (2000) Plan Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad de las Universidades (National Plan of Evaluation of Quality of the Universities). Available at: http://wwwn.mec.es/educa/jsp/plantilla.jsp?area=ccuniv&id=257 (site visited: 7 January 2005).
49. Rebolloso, E. (1987) ‘La investigación de evaluación vista a través de los Evaluation Studies Review Annual’ (Evaluation Research Seen through the Evaluation Studies Review Annual), Revista de Psicología Social 3-4(2): 183-224.
50. Rebolloso, E., B. Fernández-Ramírez, P. Cantón and C. Pozo (2000) ‘El papel de la investigación cualitativa en la evaluación de los servicios universitarios’ (The Role of Qualitative Research in the Evaluation of University Services), Cuadernos IRC 4: 65-82.
51. Rebolloso, E., B. Fernández-Ramírez, C. Pozo and P. Cantón (2001) Estrategias de calidad en la Universidad: Guía de autoevaluación para los servicios de administración universitarios (Strategies of Quality in the University: Guide for the Evaluation of University Administration Services). Valencia: Promolibro.
52. Rebolloso, E., B. Fernández-Ramírez, P. Cantón and C. Pozo (2002) ‘Metaevaluation of a Total Quality Management Evaluation System’, Psychology in Spain 6: 12-25.
53. Rebolloso, E., B. Fernández-Ramírez and P. Cantón (2003) Guía de evaluación de servicios (Guidelines for Evaluation of Services). Almería: UCUA.
54. Rodríguez, A. and C. Ardid (1996) ‘Psicología social y políticas públicas’ (Social Psychology and Public Policies), in J. L. Alvaro, A. Garrido and J. R. Torregrosa (eds) Psicología social aplicada(Applied Social Psychology), pp. 451-474. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
55. Ryan, K. E. (2004) ‘Serving Public Interests in Educational Accountability: Alternative Approaches to Democratic Evaluation’, American Journal of Evaluation 25(4): 443-460.
56. Weiss, C. H. (1980) ‘Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1(6): 381-404.
57. Weiss, C. H. (1987) ‘The Circuitry of Enlightenment’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8(2): 274-281.
58. Weiss, C. H. and M. J. Bucuvalas (1980) ‘Truth Test and Utility Tests: Decision-Makers’ Frames of Reference for Social Science Research’, American Sociological Review 45(2): 202-212.
59. Westerheijden, D. F. and M. Leegwater, eds (2003) Working on the European Dimension of Quality. Zoetermeer, the Netherlands: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sciences.