‘Back to the Rough Ground!’ Beyond Theory to Practice in Evaluation

Evaluation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 353-364

  Schwandt, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444443710     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13563890030093008     Document Type: Note

References (32)

1. Adam, B. and J. van Loon (2000) `Introduction: Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for Social Theory' in B. Adam, U. Beck and J. van Loon (eds) The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: Sage.
2. Alheit, P and B. Dausien (2002) `The “Double Face” of Lifelong Learning: Two Analytical Perspectives on a “Silent” Revolution', Paper presented at the International PhD Summer School in Lifelong Learning, Roskilde, Denmark: August.
3. Askling, B., M. Henkel and B. Kehm (2001) `Concepts of Knowledge and Their Organisation in Universities', European Journal of Education36(3): 341-350.
4. Ball, S. J. (1998) `Big Policies/Small World: An Introduction to International Perspectives in Education Policy', Comparative Education34(2): 119-130.
5. Ball, S. J. (2001) `The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity', Paper presented at the Institute of Education, London, UK: October 31. Retrieved 18 July 2002 from http://www.ie.uk/RSS/Professorstephenball.htm
6. Bernstein, R. J. (2002) `The Constellation of Hermeneutics, Critical Theory, and Deconstruction', in R. J. Dostal (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cowen, R. (1996) `Last Past the Post: Comparative Education, Modernity and Perhaps Post-Modernity', Comparative Education32(2): 151-170.
8. Dunne, R. (1993) Back to the Rough Ground. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
9. Edwards, R. and R. Usher (2001) `Lifelong Learning: A Postmodern Condition of Education?', Adult Education Quarterly51(4): 273-287.
10. Elliott, J. (2001) `Characteristics of Performative Cultures: Their Central Paradoxes and Limitations as Resources for Educational Reform' in D. Gleeson and C. Husbands (eds) The Performing School: Managing Teaching and Learning in a Performance Culture London: Routledge/Falmer.
11. Eriksen, E. and J. Weigård (1999) `The End of Citizenship? New Rules Challenging the Political Order', ARENA Working paper 1999/26. Retrieved 3 March 2002 from http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_26.htm
12. Fielding, M. (2000) `Community, Philosophy and Education Policy: Against Effectiveness Ideology and the Immiseration of Contemporary Schooling', Journal of Education Policy15(4): 397-415.
13. Fielding, M. (2001) `OFSTED, Inspection and Betrayal of Democracy', Journal of Philosophy of Education35(4): 695-709.
14. Fischer, F. (1993) `Citizen Participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquiry to Practical Case', Policy Sciences26: 165-187.
15. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Greene, J. C. (2002) `Towards Evaluation as a `Public Craft' and Evaluators as Stewards of the Public Good', Keynote address at the Annual Meeting of the Australasian Evaluation Society, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia: October.
17. Inglis, F. (2000) `A Malediction Upon Management', Journal of Education Policy15(4): 417-429.
18. Jallade, J-P. and J-G. Mora (2001) `Lifelong Learning: International Injunctions and University Practices', European Journal of Education36(3): 361-377.
19. Kincheloe, J. L. and P. McLaren (2000) `Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research', in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Lundgren, U. P. (2003) `The Political Governing (Governance) of Education and Evaluation', in P. Haug and T. A. Schwandt (eds) Evaluating Educational Reforms: Scandinavian Perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
21. Mark, M. M., G. T. Henry and G. Julnes (2000) Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
23. Sandel, M. (1996) Democracy's Discontent. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
24. Sanderson, I. (2002) `Performance Management, Evaluation, and Learning in “Modern” Management', Public Administration80(1): 297-313.
25. Schwandt, T. A. (1993) `Theory for the Moral Sciences: Crisis of Identity and Purpose', in D. J. Flinders and G. E. Mills (eds) Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Shotter, J. (1996) ` “ Now I Can Go On”: Wittgenstein and Our Embodied Embeddedness in the “Hurly-Burly” of Life', Human Studies19: 385-407.
27. Stronach, I. and M. MacLure (1997) Educational Research Undone: The Postmodern Embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.
28. Schwab, J. (1978) Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays, I. Westbury and N. J. Wilkof, eds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Taylor, C. (2002) `Gadamer on the Human Sciences' in R. J. Dostal (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wagenaar, H. and S. D. M. Cook (2003) `Understanding Policy Practices: Action, Dialectic and Deliberation in Policy Analysis', in M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Welch, A. R. (2001) `Globalisation, Post-modernity and the State: Comparative Education Facing the Third Millennium', Comparative Education Review37(4): 475-492.
32. Westbury, I. (2003) `Evaluating a National Curriculum Reform', in P. Haug and T. A. Schwandt (eds) Evaluating Educational Reforms: Scandinavian Perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.