Regarding time-sharing with convergent operations

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 137-175

  Tsang, Pamela S ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention bottleneck; Divided attention; Multiple resources; Resource allocation; Time sharing strategies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESPONSE TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 30444440160     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. J.A. Adams & R.W. Chambers Response to simultaneous stimulation of two sense modalities Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 1962 198-206
2. P.A. Allen A.F. Smith H. Vires-Collins & S. Sperry The psychological refractory period: Evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing Psychology and Aging 13 1998 218-229
3. D.A. Allport Attention and performance in: G. Claxtony (Eds) Cognitive psychology-new directions 1980 Routledge and Kegan Paul London 113-153
4. A.D. Baddeley Exploring the central executive Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 1996 5-28
5. D.E. Broadbent & M. Gregory Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 158 1967 222-231
6. L. Brooks Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall Canadian Journal of Psychology 22 1968 349-368
7. M. Donk & A.F. Sanders Resources and dual-task performance: Resource allocation versus task integration Acta Psychologica 72 1989 221-232
8. D. Gopher The skill of attention control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies in: D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds) Attention and performance XIV 1993 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 299-322
9. D. Gopher M. Brickner & D. Navon Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task performance: Evidence for multiple resources Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 1982 146-157
10. D. Gopher & D. Navon How is performance limited: Testing the notion of central capacity Acta Psychologica 46 1980 161-180
11. A.A. Hartley & D.M. Little Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 1999 416-449
12. E. Hazeltine D. Teague & R.B. Ivry Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 2002 527-545
13. L.M. Herman & B.H. Kantowitz The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double stimulation story? Psychological Bulletin 73 1970 74-88
14. W. Hirst & D. Kalmar Characterizing attentional resources Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 1987 68-81
15. J. Isreal G. Chesney C.D. Wickens & E. Donchin P300 and tracking difficulty: Evidence for a multiple capacity view of attention Psychophysiology 17 1980 259-273
16. D. Kahneman Attention and effort 1973 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
17. L. Karlin & R. Kestenbaum Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 1968 67-178
18. G. Kepple Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook 1973 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
19. R.A. Kinchla Attention Annual Review of Psychology 43 1992 711-742
20. M. Kinsbourne & R. Hicks Functional cerebral space in: J. Requin (Eds) Attention and performance VII 1978 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 345-362
21. G.D. Logan & D. Schulkind Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 2000 1072-1090
22. U. Mayr Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap Psychology and Aging 16 2001 96-109
23. R.S. McCann & J.C. Johnston Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task performance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1992 471-484
24. P. McLeod A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 1977 651-667
25. N. Meiran Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task sets during task-switching in: S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds) Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes 2000 MIT Press Cambridge, MA 377-400
26. D.E. Meyer & D.E. Kieras A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms Psychological Review 104 1997 3-65
27. D.E. Meyer & D.E. Kieras A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena Psychological Review 104 1997 749-791
28. N. Moray Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model Acta Psychologica 27 1967 84-92
29. D. Navon Resources-A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review 91 1984 216-234
30. D. Navon Attention division or attention sharing? in: M.I. Posner & O.S.M. Marin (Eds) Attention and performance XI 1985 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 133-146
31. D. Navon & D. Gopher On the economy of the human-processing system Psychological Review 80 1979 214-255
32. D. Navon & J. Miller Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion Cognitive Psychology 44 2002 193-251
33. D.A. Norman & D.G. Bobrow On data-limited and resource-limited processes Cognitive Psychology 7 1975 44-64
34. H. Pashler Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 1984 358-377
35. H. Pashler Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 1990 826-842
36. H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory Psychological Bulletin 116 1994 220-244
37. H. Pashler Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 1994 330-342
38. H. Pashler The psychology of attention 1998 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
39. H. Pashler & J.C. Johnston Attentional limitations in dual-task performance in: H. Pashler (Eds) Attention 1998 Psychology Press East Sussex, UK 155-189
40. W.S. Pritchard & R. Hendrickson The structure of human attention: evidence for separate spatial and verbal resource pools Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 1985 177-180
41. E. Ruthruff J.O. Miller & T. Lachmann Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1995 552-570
42. E. Ruthruff H.E. Pashler & E. Hazeltine Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement? Perception & Psychophysics 65 2003 801-816
43. A.F. Sanders Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill 1998 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
44. E.J. Sirevaag A.F. Kramer M.G.H. Coles & E. Donchin Resource reciprocity: An event-related brain potentials analysis Acta Psychologica 70 1989 77-97
45. G. Sperling & M.J. Melchner The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search Science 202 1978 315-318
46. S. Sternberg Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments American Scientist 57 1969 421-457
47. G.E. Stelmach P.C. Amrhein & N.L. Goggin Age differences in bimanual coordination Journal of Gerontology 43 1988 18-23
48. M. Tombu & P. Jolicoeur A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 2003 3-18
49. A. Treisman & A. Davies Divided attention to eye and ear in: S. Kornblum (Eds) Attention and performance IV 1973 Academic Press New York 101-117
50. Tsang, P. S. (1998). Time-sharing dual discrete tasks. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.
51. P.S. Tsang & T.L. Shaner Age, attention, expertise, and time-sharing performance Psychology and Aging 13 1998 323-347
52. P.S. Tsang T.L. Shaner & M.A. Vidulich Resource scarcity and outcome conflict in time-sharing performance Perception & Psychophysics 57 1995 365-378
53. Tsang, P. S., Stork, B. V., Schieltz, A. R., Krum, A. K., Flinn, J. T., Reis, G., et al. (2003). Regarding time-sharing and aging with convergent operations (Tech. Rep. EPL-03-1). Dayton, OH: Wright State University, Engineering Psychology Laboratory.
54. P.S. Tsang V.L. Velazquez & M.A. Vidulich The viability of resource theories in explaining time-sharing performance Acta Psychologica 91 1996 175-206
55. P.S. Tsang & C.D. Wickens The structural constraints and the strategic control of resource allocation Human Performance 1 1988 45-72
56. M. Van Selst & P. Jolicoeur Decision and response in dual-task interference Cognitive Psychology 33 1997 266-307
57. M.A. Vidulich Speech responses and dual task performance: Better time-sharing or asymmetric transfer Human Factors 30 1988 517-534
58. Vidulich, M. A., & Wickens, C. D. (1981). Time-sharing manual control and memory search: The joint effects of input and output modality competition, priorities and control order (Tech. Rep. No. EPL-81-4/ONR-81-4). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Engineering Psychology Research Laboratory.
59. A.T. Welford The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high speed performance British Journal of Psychology 43 1952 2-19
60. C.D. Wickens The effects of divided attention on information processing in tracking Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2 1976 1-13
61. C.D. Wickens The structure of attentional resources in: R. Nickerson (Eds) Attention and performance VIII 1980 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 239-257
62. C.D. Wickens Processing resources in attention in: R. Parasuraman & D.R. Davies Varieties of attention 1984 Academic Press New York 63-98
63. C.D. Wickens & J.G. Hollands Engineering psychology and human performance 3rd ed. 2000 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
64. C. Wickens A. Kramer L. Vanasse & E. Donchin Performance of concurrent tasks: A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources Science 221 4615 1983 1080-1082
65. C.D. Wickens & Y. Liu Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification Human Factors 30 1988 599-616