The impact of school reform on student performance evidence

Journal of Human Resources

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 500-522

  Schwartz, Amy Ellen ^a   Stiefel, Leanna ^a   Kim, Dae Yeop ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION REFORM;

EID: 3042786061     PISSN: 0022166X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3559024     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barnett, W. Steven. 1996. "Economics of School Reform: Three Promising Models." In Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-Based Reform in Education, ed. Helen F. Ladd, 299-326. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
2. Berends, Mark, Sheila Nataraj Kirby, Scott Naftel, and Christopher McKelvey. 2001. Implementation and Performance in New American Schools: Three Years into Scale-Up. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
3. Bifulco, Robert. 2001. "Do Whole-School Reform Models Boost Student Performance: The Case of New York City." Syracuse University. Unpublished.
4. Cook, Thomas D.. Farah-naaz Habib, Meredith Phillips, Richard A. Settersten. Shobha C. Shagle. and Serdar M. Degirmencioglu. 1999. "Comer's School Development Program in Prince George's County, Maryland : A Theory-Based Evaluation." American Educational Research Journal 36(3):543-97.
5. Cook, Thomas D., H. David Hunt, and Robert F. Murphy. 2000. "Comer School Development Program in Chicago: A Theory-Based Evaluation." American Educational Research Journal 37(2):535-97.
6. Finn. Jeremy D. and Kristin E. Voelkl. 1993. "School Characteristics Related to Student Engagement." Journal of Negro Education 62(3 ):249-68.
7. Fowler, William J., Jr. and Herbert J. Walberg. 1991. "School Size, Characteristics and Outcomes." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 13(2):189-202.
8. Greenwald, Rob, Larry V. Hedges, and Richard D. Laine. 1996. "The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement." Review of Educational Research 66(3):361-69.
9. Hanushek, Eric A. 1986. "The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools." Journal of Economic Literature 24(3):1141-77.
10. Hanushek, Eric A. John F. Kain, and Steven G. Rivkin. 2001. "Disruption versus Tiebout Improvement: The Costs and Benefits of Switching Schools." National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper No. 8479.
11. Herman, Rebecca, Daniel Aladjam, Patricia McMahon, Erik Masem, Ivor Mulligan, Amy Smith O'Malley, Sherri Quinones, Alison Reeve, and Darren Woodruff. 1999. An Educator's Guide to Schoolwide Reform, Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Research.
12. Iatarola, Patrice. 2002. "The Cost-Effectiveness of New York Networks for School Renewal." Florida State University. Unpublished.
13. Jones, Elizabeth M., Gary D. Gottfredson, and Denise C. Gottfredson. 1997. "Success for Some: An Evaluation of a Success for All Program." Evaluation Review 21(6):643-70.
14. King, Jennifer A. 1994. "Meeting the Educational Needs of At-Risk Students: A Cost Analysis of Three Models." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16(1):1-19.
15. Lee, Valerie E. and Julia B. Smith. 1993 "Effects of School Restructuring on the Achievement and Engagement of Middle-Grade Students." Sociology of Education 66(3):164-87.
16. Lee, Valerie E. and Julia B. Smith. 1995. "Effects of High School Restructuring and Size on Early Gains in Achievement and Engagement." Sociology of Education 68(4):241-70.
17. Lee, Valerie E. and Julia B. Smith. 1997. "High School Size: Which Works Best, and for Whom?" Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19(3):205-27.
18. Lee, Valerie E. and Susanna Loeb. 2000, "School Size in Chicago Elementary Schools: Effects on Teachers' Attitudes and Students' Achievements." American Educational Research Journal 37(1):3-31.
19. Lindsay, Paul. 1982. "The Effect of High School Size on Student Participation, Satisfaction, and Attendance." Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 4(1):57-65.
20. Lopus, Jane S. 1990. "Do Additional Expenditures Increase Achievement in the High School Economics Class?" Journal of Economic Education 21(3):277-86.
21. Monk, David H. 1984a. "The Conception of Size and the Internal Allocation of School District Resources." Education Administration Quarterly 20(1):39-67.
22. Monk, David H. 1984b. "Interdependencies Among Educational Inputs and Resource Allocation in Classrooms." Economics of Education Review 3(1):65-73.
23. Morgan, David L. and Duane F. Alwin. 1980. "When Less is More: School Size and Student Social Participation." Social Psychology Quarterly 43(2):241-52.
24. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. 1999. Catalog of School Reform Models. Portland Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
25. Odden, Allan, Sarah Archibald, and Anita Tychsen. 2000. "Can Wisconsin Schools Afford Comprehensive School Reform?" Journal of Education Finance 25(3):323-42.
26. Pittman, Robert B. and Perri Haughwout. 1987. "Influence of High School Size on Drop-out Rate." Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9(4): 337-43.
27. Pradl, Gordon, Christine Donis-Keller, Monica Martinez, and Carmen Arroyo. 2001. New York Networks for School Renewal (NYNSR): An Implementation Study. The NYNSR Research Consortium's Publication, Institute for Education and Social Policy. New York: New York University.
28. Sander, William. 1993. "Expenditures and Student Achievement in Illinois: New Evidence." Journal of Public Economics 52: 403-16.
29. Schneider, Barbara L. 1985. "Further Evidence of School Effects" Journal of Educational Research 78(6):351-56.
30. Stiefel, Leanna, Robert Berne, Patrice Iatarola, and Norm Fruchter. 2000. "High School Size: Effects on Budgets and Performance in New York City." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22(1):27-39.
31. Todd, Petra E. and Kenneth I. Wolpin. Forthcoming. "Towards a Unified Approach for Modeling the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement" Economic Journal.