Emerging online learning environments and student learning: An analysis of faculty perceptions

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 78-86

  Myers, Carrie B ^a   Bennett, Dennis ^b   Brown, Gary ^b   Henderson, Tom ^b  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Higher education; Learning technologies; Online education

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042675318     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Carlson, S. (2000). Campus survey finds that adding technology to teaching is a top issue. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, A46.
2. Carr, S. (2000). Many professors are optimistic on distance learning, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, A35.
3. Chickering, A. & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as a lever. AAHE Bulletin, 48, 3-6.
4. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42, 21-29.
5. Creed, T. (1997). Extending the classroom walls electronically. In Campbell, W. E & Smith, K. A. (Eds.), New paradigms for college teaching, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, 149-184.
6. Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N. & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Compararive analysis of learning satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29-49.
7. Ehrmann, S. C. (1995). Asking the right question: What does research tell us about technology and higher education? Change, 27, 20-27.
8. Emerson, J. D. & Mosteller, F. (1998a). Interactive multimedia in college teaching. Part I: A ten-year review of reviews. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 23, 43-58.
9. Emerson, J. D. & Mosteller, F. (1998b). Interactive multimedia in college teaching. Part II: Lessons from research in the sciences. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 23, 59-75.
10. Ennis, C. D. (1998). Shared expectations: Creating a joint vision for urban schools. In Brophy, J.(Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom, Vol. 7, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 151-182.
11. Gilbert, S. (1996). Making the most of a slow revolution. Change, 28, 10-23.
12. Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Craner, J., Lim B. & Duffy, T. M. (2000). Teaching in a web-based distance learning environment: An evaluation summary based on four courses. Center for Research on Learning and Technology Technical Report No. 13-00. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
13. Guskin, A. E. (1994). Restructuring the role of faculty. Change, 26, 16-25.
14. Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 153-160.
15. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. MacFarlane, A. G. J. (1995). Future patterns of teaching and learning. In Schuller, T. (Ed.), The changing university, Bristol, PA: Open University Press, 12-38.
17. McInnis, C. (2002). The impact of technology on faculty performance and its evaluation. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 53-61.
18. th Edition, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1122-1156.
19. Moore, M. & Kearsky, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20. Nantz, K. S. & Lundgren, T. D. (1998). Lecturing with technology. College Teaching, 46, 53-56.
21. Nothrup, P. T. (1997). Faculty perceptions of distance education: Factors influencing utilization. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 3, 343-358.
22. th annual meeting of the ARL: The research library the day after tomorrow. Austin, TX.
23. Olcott, D. & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 3, 5-17.
24. Pierpoint, P. E. & Hartnett, R. A. (1988). Faculty attitudes towards teaching in off-campus graduate programs. International Journal of Innovative Higher Education, 5(1), 25-30.
25. Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In Brophy, J. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom, Vol. 7, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 49-74.
26. Saba, F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1, 1-9.
27. Taylor, J. C. & White, V. J. (1991). Faculty attitudes towards teaching in the distance education mode: An exploratory investigation. Research in Distance Education, 7-11.
28. Thompson, M. (2002). Faculty satisfaction. Sloan-C View, 1, 6-7.
29. Willcoxson, L. (1998). The impact of academics' learning and teaching preferences on their teaching practices: A pilot study. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 59-70.
30. Wolcott, L. L. & Betts, K. S. (1999). What's in it for me? Incentives for faculty participation in distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 34-49.
31. Wood, F. H., & Thompson, S. R. (1993). Assumptions about staff development based on research and best practice. Journal of Staff Development, 14, 52-57.