Senior school board officials' perceptions of a national achievement assessment program

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 10, Issue , 2002, Pages

  Simon, Marielle ^a   Forgette Giroux, Renée ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042667054     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Bechger, T.M., van den Wittenboer, G., Hox, J. J., & De Glopper, C. (1999). The validity of comparative educational studies. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 18-26.
2. Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (1999). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. Windsor Ontario: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
3. Campbell, J. R., Kelly, D. L., Mullis, J. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Sainsbury, M. (2001). Framework and specifications for PIRLS assessment 2001. PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College: Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
4. st Century. A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
5. CMEC (2000). SAIP Science Report 1999. Toronto.
6. College Board (1999). Mathematics framework for the 1996 and 2000 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
7. Council of Chief State School Officers (1999a). Reading framework for the national assessment of educational progress: 1992-2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services ED430209)
8. Council of Chief State School Officers (1999b). Science framework for the 1996 and 2000 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services ED431618)
9. Cousins, B., & Simon, M. (1993). A review and analysis of the thematic program, "Education and work in a changing society" of the SSHRC strategic grants program. Final and Technical reports submitted to Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
10. Crocker, R. K. (1997). Study of the school achievement indicator program. Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.
11. Crooks, T. (1996). Validity issues in state or national monitoring educational outcomes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services ED398285)
12. Crooks, T., & Flockton, L. (1999). The design of New Zealand's national education monitoring project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
13. Flockton, L., & Crooks, T. (1997). Reading & speaking assessment results 1996. Ministry of Education, New Zealand. Dunedin: Educational Assessment Research Unit, University of Otago.
14. Forgette-Giroux, R., & Simon, M. (2000). School Achievement Indicators Program - Second cycle evaluation. Report submitted to the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. Toronto.
15. Hattie, J., Jaeger, R.M., & Bond, L. (1999). Persistent Methodological Questions in Education Testing. In Asghar Iran-Nejad, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24, 393-446.
16. Haertel, E. H. (2002). Standard setting as a participatory process: Implications for validation of standards-based accountability programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 16-22.
17. Horkay, N. (Ed.) (1999). The NAEP guide, NCES 2000-456. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. National Center for Educational Statistics.
18. Human Resources and Development, Canada & Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1999). Memorandum of understanding. Unpublished document.
19. Hunter, D., & Gambell, T. (2000). Professionalism, professional development, and teacher participation in scoring of large-scale assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. Edmonton.
20. nd Ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill-Ryerson.
21. Jones (2001). Assessing achievement versus high-stakes testing: A crucial contrast. Educational Assessment, 7(1), 21-28.
22. Lane, S., & Stone, C. A. (2002). Strategies for examining the consequences of assessment and accountability programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 23-30.
23. Linn, R. L., (2001). The influence of external evaluations on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. CSE Technical Report 548. Los Angeles: Center of the Study of Evaluation, National Center for the Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
24. Macdonell, A., Forgette-Giroux, R., Schmidt, S., Mougeot, Y., & Levesque, J. (1999). Rapport sur l'évaluation d'étape du réseau stratégique en éducation, formation et emploi. Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Humaines du Canada, Ottawa.
25. Madaus, G. F., & Pullin, D. (2000). Questions to ask when evaluating a high-stakes testing program. Consortium of Equity in Standards and Testing. Available online: http://wwwstecp.bc.edu/CTESTWEB/documents/CTEST/NCASPress.pdf .
26. Pellegrino, J. W., Jones, L., & Mitchell, K. J. (Eds.) (1999). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and transforming the assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Popham, W. J. (1999). Where Large Scale Educational Assessment Is Heading and Why It Shouldn't. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(3), 18-26.
28. th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
29. Ryan, K. (2002). Assessment validation in the context of high-stakes assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 7-15.
30. Robitaille, D. F., Beaton, A. E., & Plomp, T. (Eds.) (2000). The impact of TIMSS on the teaching & learning of mathematics & science. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
31. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., & Oakes, J. (1991a). What Are Educational Indicators and Indicator Systems? Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2(11). Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v= 2&n=11 .
32. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., & Oakes, J. (1991b). Steps in Designing an Indicator System. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2(12). Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=2&n=12
33. Shepard, L. (1977). A checklist for evaluating large-scale assessment programs. Available online: http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/pubs/ops/ops09.html .
34. Wilde, J., & Sockey, S. (1995). Evaluation handbook. New Mexico: EAC West New Mexico Highlands University.
35. Wilson, R. J. (1999). Aspects of validity in large-scale programs of student assessment. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLV(4), 333-343.