Group and interaction effects with "No Child Left Behind": Gender and reading in a poor, Appalachian district

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 12, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Bickel, Robert ^a   Maynard, A Stan ^a,b  

^a MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b June Harless Ctr Rural Educ R D

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042653373     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v12n4.2004     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aiken, L. and West, G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Angeles, A. and Mroz, T. (2001) A Guide to Using Multilevel Models for the Evaluation of Program Impact. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
3. Baron, R. and Kenny, D. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51: 1173-1182.
4. Bianchini, L (2002) NCTE Resolution on the Reading First Initiative. News from NCTE.org/news/2002/resolution.shtml.
5. Bickel, R. and Howley, C. (2000) The Influence of Scale on School Performance: A Multilevel Extension of the Matthew Principle. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 8. epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n22.html
6. Bickel, R. and Howley, C. (2003) Elementary Math Achievement and Rural Development: Effects of Contextual Factors Intrinsic to the Modern World. Athens, OH: ACCLAIM Working Paper No. 15, Appalachian Collaborative for Learning, Assessment, and Instruction in Mathematics.
7. Bickel, H., Howley, C., Glascock, C., and Williams, T. (2001) High School Size, Achievement Equity, and Cost: Robust Interaction Effects and Tentative Results. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 9. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n40. html
8. Bickel, R., Smith, C., and Eagle, T. (2002) Poor, Rural Neighborhoods and Early School Achievement. Journal of Poverty. 6: 89-108.
9. Bracey, G. (2003) NCLB - A Plan for the Destruction of Public Education. NoChildLeft.Com. Februray. http://NoChildLeft.com/2003/feb03no.html
10. Bush, G. (2002) President Launches Quality Teacher Initiative. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.
11. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A., and Price, B. (2000) Regression Analysis by Example. New York: Wiley.
12. Cloer, T. and Dalton, S. (2001) Gender and Grade Differences in Reading Achievement and in Self-Concept as Readers. Journal of Reading Achievement. 26: 31-36.
13. Coles, G. (2001) Learning to Read "Scientifically." Rethinking Schools Online. Summer. http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archives/15_04/read154. htm
14. Denlinger, S. (2002) Teaching as a Profession: A Look at the Problem of Teacher Deficits. Clearing House. 75: 116-117.
15. Hardy, L. (2003) Overburdened and Overwhelmed. ASBJ.Com. April. http://www.sdbj.com/current/coverstory.html
16. Heck, R. and Thomas, L. (2000) An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
17. High, C. (1996) The Texas Study: A Regression Analysis of Selected Factors that Influence the Scores of Students on the TASP Test. Houston: Texas Association of College Testing Personnel.
18. Huston, P. (2003) The Bigotry of Expectations. School Administrator. January. ht tp://www.aasa.org.publications/sa/2003 01/execeper.htm
19. International Reading Association (2003) IRA Survey Examines Process for Reading First Applications. Reading Today. February/March. http://www/reading. org/publications/rty/archives/o3feb_survey.html
20. Iversen, G. (1991) Contextual Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, T., and Choi, K. (1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Kmenta, J. (1997) Elements of Econometrics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
23. Kreft, I. and De Leeuw (1998) Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Lynch, J. (2002) Parents' Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Parents' Gender, Children's Reader Self-Perceptions, Reading Achievement, and Gender. Journal of Research in Reading. 25: 54-67.
25. Menard, S. (2002) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Otterbourg, S. (2001) The Partnership for Family Involvement in Education: Who We and What We Do. Jessup, MD: The Partnership for Family Involvement in Education.
27. Phillips, L., Norris, S., Osmond, W. & Maynard, A. (2002) Relative Reading Achievement of 187 Children from First through Sixth Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94: 3-13.
28. Raudenbush, S. and Bryk, A. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Rebora, A. (2002) No Child Left Behind. Education Week on the Web, April 2. http://www.edweek.org/context/topics/issuespage.cfm?id=59
30. Schineller, L. (1997) An Econometric Model of Capital Flight from Developing >Countries. Washington, D.C.: International Finance Discussion Paper, Number 579, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
31. Seldon, R (2001) Parent Power: Why National Standards Won't Improve Education. Washington, D.C.: The Cato Institute.
32. Snijders, T. and Bosker, R. (1999) Multilevel Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Solon, G., Page, M., and Duncan, G. (2000) Correlations Between Neighboring Children in Their Subsequent Educational Attainment. Review of Economics and Statistics. 82: 383-393.
34. SPSS (2001) SPSS Advanced Models 11.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
35. Thompson, C. and Cunningham, E. (2000) Retention and Social Promotion: Implications for Policy. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
36. U.S. Census Bureau (2001) QuickFacts. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Health and Human Services.
37. U.S. Department of Education (2002a) The "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," Executive Summary (Updated). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38. U.S. Department of Education (2002b) The "No Child Left Behind" Act: Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Act Legislation and Policies Website. July 11. 〈www.ed.gov/offices/OES E/esea/〉
39. U.S. Department of Education (2003) Comments by Secretary Paige to the Commonwealth Club of California. March 12. www.ed.gov/02-2003 /03122003a.html
40. Velicer, W. (1972) The Moderator Variable Viewed as Heterogeneous Regression. Journal of Applied Psychology. 56: 266-269.
41. Vartanian, T., and Gleason, P. (1999) Do Neighborhood Conditions Affect High School Dropout and College Graduation Rates. Journal of Socioeconomics. 28: 21-42.
42. White House (2002) Fact Sheet: No Child Left Behind. January 8. www.whitehouse/gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020108.html
43. White House (2001) Transforming the Federal Role in Education so that No Child No Child is Left Behind. December 12. www.whitehouse.gov/news/reports/no- child-left-behind.html
44. Woodcock, R. and Johnson, M. (1990) Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Services.