Residual stenosis poststenting and subsequent decrease in the proximal reference diameter are correlated: Excessive axial wall stress is a plausible explanation

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 310-318

  Doriot, Pierre André ^a   Dorsaz, Pierre André ^a  

^a Faculty of Medicine   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Axial wall stress; Edge restenosis; Remodeling; Stent; Vessel diameter

Indexed keywords

RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL;

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BRACHYTHERAPY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FOLLOW UP; HEART VENTRICLE REMODELING; HUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; STENT;

ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUSCLE, SMOOTH, VASCULAR; SHEAR STRENGTH; STENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 3042604842     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/03-1109.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lansky AJ, Popma JJ, Massullo V, et al. Quantitative angiographic analysis of stent restenosis in the Scripps Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Intimal Proliferation Poststenting (SCRIPPS) Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:410-414.
2. Albiero R, Adamian M, Kobayashi N, et al. Short- and intermediate-term results of (32)P radioactive beta-emitting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: the Milan Dose-Response Study. Circulation. 2000; 101:18-26.
3. Hehrlein C, DeVries JJ, Arab A, et al. Failure of a novel balloon-expandable gamma-emitting ((103)Pd) stent to prevent edge effects. Circulation. 2001;104:2358-2362.
4. Kozuma K, Costa MA, Sabate M, et al. Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound assessment of noninjured edges of beta-irradiated coronary segments. Circulation. 2000;102: 1484-1489.
5. van Der Giessen WJ, Regar E, Harteveld MS, et al. "Edge effect" of (32)p radioactive stents is caused by the combination of chronic stent injury and radioactive dose falloff. Circulation. 2001;104:2236-2241.
6. Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, Teirstein PS, et al. Effect of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy on in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound analysis from the gamma-1 study. Circulation. 2000;102:2915-2918.
7. Sabate M, Serruys PW, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Geometric vascular remodeling after balloon angioplasty and beta-radiation therapy: a three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1999;100:1182-1188.
8. Costantini CO, Lansky AJ, Mintz GS, et al. Implications of the presence and length of "geographic miss" on restenosis and the edge phenomenon in the INHIBIT trial. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:1261-1265.
9. Kwok PC, Wong KM, Ngan RK, et al. Prevention of recurrent central venous stenosis using endovascular irradiation following stent placement in hemodialysis patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;24:400-406.
10. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, et al. Serial intravascular ultrasound predictors of restenosis at the margins of Palmaz-Schatz stents. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:951-953.
11. Gercken U, Lansky AJ, Buellesfeld L, et al. Results of the Jostent coronary stent graft implantation in various clinical settings: procedural and follow-up results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;56:353-360.
12. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315-1323.
13. Dobrin P, Canfield T, Sinha S. Development of longitudinal retraction of carotid arteries in neonatal dogs. Experientia. 1975;31:1295-1296.
14. Doriot PA. Estimation of the supplementary axial wall stress generated at peak flow by an arterial stenosis. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:127-138.
15. van Sambeek MR, Qureshi A, van Lankeren W, et al. Discrepancy between stent deployment and balloon size used assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15:57-61.
16. Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, et al. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:651-659.
17. Foley DP, Pieper M, Wijns W, et al. The influence of stent length on clinical and angiographic outcome in patients undergoing elective stenting for native coronary artery lesions; final results of the Magic 5L Study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1585-1593.
18. Han RO, Schwartz RS, Kobayashi Y, et al. Comparison of self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents for the reduction of restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:253-259.
19. Hoffmann R, Jansen C, Konig A, et al. Stent design related neointimal tissue proliferation in human coronary arteries; an intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2007-2014.
20. Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation. 2001;104:1343-1349.
21. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Coated Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1773-1780.
22. Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, et al. Angiographic findings of the multicenter Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL): sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation. 2002; 106:1949-1956.
23. Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij MJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses: final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance (TULIP Study). Circulation. 2003;107:62-67.
24. Park SJ, Shim WH, Ho DS, et al. A paclitaxel-eluting stent for the prevention of coronary restenosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1537-1545.
25. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation. 2003;107:38-42.
26. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Gilard M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty compared with stent: immediate and 6-month results of the multicenter, randomized Balloon Equivalent to Stent Study (BEST). Circulation. 2003;107:545-551.
27. Mudra H, Regar E, Klauss V, et al. Serial follow-up after optimized ultrasound-guided deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stents. In-stent neointimal proliferation without significant reference segment response. Circulation. 1997;95:363-370.
28. Beatt KJ, Luijten HE, de Feyter PJ, et al. Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:315-323.
29. Hermans WR, Foley DP, Rensing BJ, et al. Morphologic changes during follow-up after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty: quantitative angiographic analysis in 778 lesions-further evidence for the restenosis paradox. MERCATOR Study Group (Multicenter European Research trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis). Am Heart J. 1994;127:483-494.
30. Zamorano J, Erbel R, Ge J, et al. Vessel wall changes in the proximal non-treated segment after PTCA. An in vivo intracoronary ultrasound study. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:1505-1511.
31. Nishioka T, Nagai T, Luo H, et al. Coronary remodeling of proximal and distal stenotic atherosclerotic plaques within the same artery by intravascular ultrasound study. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:387-391.
32. Kakuta T, Usui M, Coats WD, et al. Arterial remodeling at the reference site after angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:47-51.
33. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Schwarzenberg H, Hutzelmann A, et al. Intravascular ultrasound evaluation of peripheral arterial stent-grafts. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:97-104.
34. Nakagawa Y, Yufu K, Nakamori S, et al. Clinical and angiographic follow-up after single long GFX coronary stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;50:40-47.
35. Grewe PH, Machraoui A, Deneke T, et al. Structural analysis of 16 different coronary stent systems [in German]. Z Kardiol. 1997;86:990-999.
36. Thuesen L, Andersen HR, Bagger H, et al. Long genuine coronary artery lesions treated with stiff tubular or flexible coiled stents. A randomized angiographic follow-up study. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002;36:91-94.
37. Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, et al. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BEIgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1067-1074.
38. Brophy JM, Belisle P, Joseph L. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:777-786.