Pinus oocarpa isoenzymatic variation along an altitudinal gradient in Michoacán, México

Silvae Genetica

Volumn 52, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 237-240

  Saenz Romero C ^a   Tapia Olivares, B L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA DE SAN NICOLÁS DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Deforestation; Genetic resources conservation; Isoenzymes; Mexico; Michoacan; Pinus oocarpa; Population genetics

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; GENES; LAND USE;

ALLELE FREQUENCIES; FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES;

FORESTRY;

ALLELES; DEFORESTATION; FORESTRY; LAND USE; PINUS OOCARPA;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PINUS OOCARPA;

EID: 3042601114     PISSN: 00375349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BALLAL, S. R., FORE, S. A. and GUTTMANN, S. I.: Apparent gene flow and genetic structure of Acer saccharum subpopulations in forest fragments. Can. J. Bot. 72: 1311-1315 (1994).
2. BERMEJO-VELÁZQUEZ, B.: Genetic diversity and the mating system in Pinus engelmannii Carr. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Madison, Wisconsin, 91 p. (1993).
3. BUSH, R. M. and SMOUSE, P. E.: The impact of electrophoretic genotype on life-story traits in Pinus taeda. Evolution 45(3): 481-498 (1991).
4. CHELIAK, W. M., DANCIK, B. P., MORGAN, K., YEH, F. C. H. and STROBECK, C.: Temporal variation of the mating system in a natural population of jack pine. Genetics 109: 569-584 (1985).
5. CHUNG, M. G. and KANG, S. S.: Genetic variation within and among populations of Camellia japonica (Theaceae) in Korea. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 537-542 (1996).
6. COFOM (Comision Forestal del Estado de Michoacán).: Atlas Forestal del Estado de Michoacán. México, COFOM, 97 p. (2001).
7. DÍAZ, V., MUÑIZ, L. M. and FERRER, E.: Random amplified polymorphic DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism assessment of genetic variation in Nicaragua populations of Pinus oocarpa. Molecular Ecology 10: 2593-2603 (2001).
8. DVORAK, W. S., GUTIÉRREZ, E. A., OSORIO, L. F., HODGE, G. R. and BRAWNER, J. T.: Pinus oocarpa. In: Conservation and Testing of Tropical and Subtropical Forest Tree Species by the CAMCORE Cooperative (ed. CAMCORE Cooperative). College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. pp. 129-147 (2000).
9. ETTL, G. J. and PETERSON, D. L.: Genetic variation of subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.)Nutt.) in the Olympic mountains, Wa., USA. Silvae Genetica 50(3-4): 145-153 (2001).
10. FARJON, A. and STYLES, B. T.: Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. New York, New York Botanical Garden, 291 p. (1997).
11. FARRIS, M. A. and MITTON, J. B.: Population density, outcrossing rate and heterozygote superiority in ponderosa pine. Evolution 38(45): 1151-1154 (1984).
12. FISHER, R. A.: Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd (1954).
13. FORESTRY COMPENDIUM.: Forestry Compendium Edition 2003. CAB International. http://www.cabi.org/compendia/fc/index.asp (2003).
14. GREAVES, A.: Pinus oocarpa. Forestry Abstracts 43(9): 503-532 (1982).
15. GUERRERO, M. J.: Exportan fruta. Provincia (Michoacan newspaper). Wednesday 8 May 2002, Section B, p. 6 (2002).
16. HALDANE, J. B. S.: An exact test for randomness of mating. Journal of Genetics 52: 631-635 (1954).
17. HAMRICK, J. L. and GODT, M. J. W: Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: BROWN, A. D. H., M. T. CLEGG, A. L KAHLER and B. S. WEIR (Eds.) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sunderland, Sinauer, pp 43-63 (1990).
18. HERNÁNDEZ, J. J.: Variación genética isoenzimática en Pinus ayacahuite y sus dos variedades de México y Centroamérica. M.Sc. Thesis. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Chapingo, México. 103 p. (1990).
19. LEDIG, F. T.: The conservation of diversity in forest trees. Bioscience 38(7): 471-478 (1988).
20. LEDIG, F. T., CONKLE, M. T., BERMEJO-VELÁZQUEZ, B., EGUILUZ-PIEDRA, T., HODGSKISS, P. D., JOHNSON, D. R. and DVORAL, W. S.: Evidence of an extreme bottleneck in a rare Mexican pinyon: genetic diversity, disequilibrium, and the mating system in Pinus maximartinezii. Evolution 53(1): 91-99 (1999).
21. LEDIG, F. T., CAPÓ-ARTEAGA, M. A., HODGSKISS, P. D., SBAY, H., FLORES-LÓPEZ, C., CONKLE, M. T. and BERMEJO-VELÁZQUEZ, B.: Genetic diversity and the mating system of a rare Mexican pinon, Pinus pinceana, and a comparison with Pinus maximartinezii (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1977-1987 (2001).
22. MACDONALD, S. E., THOMAS, B. R., CHERNIAWSKY, D. M. and PUDRÍ, B. G.: Managing genetic resources of lodgepole pine in west-central Alberta: patterns of isozyme variation in natural populations and effects of forest management. For. Ecol. Management 152: 45-58 (2001).
23. MANLY, B. F. J.: Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in Biology. New York, Chapman and Hall (1991).
24. MATHESON, A. C., BELL, J. C. and BARNES, R. D.: Breeding systems and genetic structure in some Central American pine populations. Silvae Genetica 38(3-4): 107-113 (1989).
25. MILLAR, C. I. and LIBBY, W. J.: Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic and disjunct population diversity in widespread species. In: Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants, (eds. D.A. Falk & K.E. Holsinger). Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp 149-170 (1991).
26. MILLAR, C. I., STRAUSS, S. H., CONKLE, M. T. and WESTFALL, R. D.: Allozyme differentiation and biosystematics of the Californian closed-cone pines (Pinus subsect. Oocarpae). Systematic Botany 13(3): 351-370 (1988).
27. MILLER, M. P.: Tools for Population Genetics Analysis (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows program for analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by the author. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 5210 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5210 USA (2000). http://bioweb.usu.edu/mpmbio/index.htm.
28. NEI, M.: Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106(949): 283-292 (1972).
29. PERRY, P. J.: The Pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, 231 p. (1991).
30. PLESSAS, M. E. and STRAUSS, S. H.: Allozyme differentiation among populations, stands and cohorts in Monterrey pine. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 1155-1164 (1986).
31. RAMÍREZ-HERRERA, C., VARGAS-HERNÁNDEZ, J., JASSO-MATA, J., CARILLO-CASTAÑEDA, G. and GUILLÉN-ANDRADE, H.: Variación isoenzimática en diez poblaciones naturales de Pinus greggii Engelm. Agrociencia 31: 223-230 (1997a).
32. RAMÍREZ-HERRERA, C., VARGAS-HERNÁNDEZ, J. J. and LÓPEZ-UPTON, J.: Allozyme variation in the Mexican closed-cone pines. In: Recent advances in biotechnology for tree conservation and management. Proceedings of an International Foundation for Sciences Workshop. Florianópolis, Brazil, 15-19 September 1997. pp 89-93 (1997b).
33. SOKAL, R. and ROHLF, F. J.: Biometry. New York, W.H. Freeman (1995).
34. SWOFFORD, D. L. and OLSEN, G. J.: Phylogeny reconstruction. In: HILLIS, D. M. and MORITZ, C. (eds.): Molecular Systematics. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates (1990).
35. WEIR, B. S. and COCKERHAM, C. C.: Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370 (1984).
36. YAMADA, M. and GURIES, R. P.: Manual for starch gel electrophoresis: new chocolate lovers edition. Staff Paper Series # 3. Madison, Wisconsin, Department of Forestry, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 21 p. (1989).
37. YAZDANI, R., MUONA, O., RUDIN, D. and SZMIDT, A. E.: Genetic structure of a Pinus sylvestris L. Seed-tree stand naturally regenerated understory. For. Sci. 31(2): 430-436 (1985).
38. ZAMORA-SERRANO, C.: Algunos aspectos sobre Pinus oocarpa Schiede en el estado de Chiapas. Ciencia Forestal 32: 25-53 (1981).