Monitoring the middle school movement: Are teachers in step?

Current Issues in Education

Volumn 7, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Huss, John A ^a  

^a NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042569648     PISSN: 1099839X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alexander, W. M., & McEwin, C. K. (1989). Schools in the middle: Status and progress. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
2. Becker, H. (1987). Addressing the needs of different groups of early adolescents: Effects of varying school and organizational practices on students from different social backgrounds and abilities. (Report No. 16). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
3. Carnegie Council. (1989; 2000). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Council on Adolescent Development of the Carnegie Council.
4. Clark, C.M., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In Wittrock (Ed) Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
5. Cochran-Smith, M. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19/2, 2-10.
6. Connolly, F., Yakimowski-Srebnick, M., & Russo, C. (2002). An examination of K-5,6-8 versus K-8 grade configurations. ERS Spectrum, 20, 28-37.
7. DeYoung, A., Howley, C., & Theobald, P. (1995). The cultural contradictions of middleschooling for rural community survival. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 11(1), 24-35.
8. Dickinson, J., & Butler, D. (2001). Reinventing the middle school. Middle School Journal, 33, 7-13.
9. Epstein, J.L., & MacIver, D. J. (1990). Education in the middle grades: Overview of national trends and practices. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
10. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications, 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Incorporated.
11. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
12. Gruhn, W., & Douglass, H. (1956). The modern junior high school. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
13. Howell, D. (1998). Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edition. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth, Brooks, and Cole Publishing.
14. Hough, D. (1999). A bona fide middle school: Programs, policy, practice and grade span configurations. In Irwin J.L. What current research says to the middle level practitioner. Columbus,OH: National Middle School Association.
15. Jackson, A. & Davis, G. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Jenkins, D., & McEwin, C. (1992). Which school for the fifth grader? Programs and practices in three grade organizations. Middle School Journal, 23(4), 8-13.
17. Koos, L. (1927). The junior high school. Boston, MA: Ginn and Company.
18. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
19. LeCompte, M., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Lucas, S., & Valentine, J. (2001). NMSA Research Summary #1: Grade Configuration. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
21. McEwin, C. K. & Dickinson, T. S. (1995). The professional preparation of middle level teachers: Profiles of successful programs. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
22. McEwin, C.K. & Dickinson, T.S. (1996). Forgotten youth, forgotten teachers: Transformation of the professional preparation of teachers of young adolescents. Middle Grades School State Policy Initiative, Carnegie Corporation of New York.
23. McEwin, C.K., Dickinson, T.S., & Jenkins, D.M. (1995). America's middle schools: Practices and progress A 25- year perspective. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
24. McMillan, J. (1989). Focus group interview: Implications for educational research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, San Francisco, California.
25. Mizell, H. (2000a). What works? Who cares? Washington, D.C.: Paper presented at the National Conference on Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in the Middle Grades: Linking Research and Practice.
26. Mizell, H. (2000b). Middle school reform: Where are we now? Robinsonville, MS: Paper presented at the William Winter Principals' Leadership Institute.
27. National Middle School Association. (1982, 1995, 2003). This we believe. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
28. Norton, J., & Lewis, A. (2000). Middle Grades Reform: A special report. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 4.
29. Offenberg, R. (2001). The efficacy of Philadelphia's K-to-8 Schools compared to middle grades schools. Middle School Journal, 32, 23-29.
30. Paglin, C. &; Fager, J. (1997). Grade configuration: Who goes where? Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Lab.
31. Pitton, D. (2001). The school and the child and the child in the school. Middle School Journal, 33, 14-20.
32. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Sikula (Ed), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York:Macmillan Publishing company
33. Roeser, R., Eccles, J., & Sameroff, A. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development; A summary of findings. The Elementary School, 100, 452.
34. Russell, J. (1994). An evaluation of middle level schooling: Implementation of programming concepts in relation to student achievement. (ERIC Document Reproduction No.ED394620).
35. Scales, P.C. (1992). Windows of opportunity: Improving middle grades teacher preparation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Center for Early Adolescence.
36. Scales, P.C. & McEwin, K.C. (1994). Growing pains: The making of America's middle Schoolteachers. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
37. Strahan, D. (1992). Turning points and beyond: Coming of age in middle level research. In Irvin (Ed), Transforming middle level education: Perspectives and possibilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Stahler, T. (1996). Middle level teaching: Developing an attitude. St. Louis, MO: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators.
39. Valentine, J.W., Clark, D.C., Nickerson, N.C., & Keefe, J.W. (1981). The middle level principalship, volume 1: A survey of middle level programs. Reston, VA: National association of Secondary Principals,
40. Valentine, J., Clark, D. C., Irvin, J. L., Keefe, J. W., & Melton, G. (1993). Leadership in middle level education: A national survey of middle level leaders and schools (Vol.1). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary SchoolPrincipals.
41. Vulliamy, G. (1997). A comparative case-study analysis of small schools in England and Finland. Comparative Education, 33, 97-115.
42. Warren, L., & Payne, B. (1997). Impact of middle grades organization on teacher efficacy and environmental perceptions. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 301-308.
43. Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (1981). The essential middle school. Columbus, OH: Charles E.Merrill Publishing Company.
44. Wiles, J., & Thomason, J. (1975). Middle school research 1968-1974: A review of substantial studies. Educational Leadership, 32, 421-423.
45. Woods, P. & Bagley, C. (1996). Market elements in a public service. Journal of Educational Policy, 6, 11.