The School and the Child and the Child in the School

Middle School Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 14-20

  Pitton, Debra Eckerman ^a  

^a GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644913817     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23276223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00940771.2001.11495572     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Atwell, N., (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
2. Beane, J. A., (1995). Myths, politics and meaning in curriculum integration. In Y., Siu-Runyan & V., Faircloth (Eds.), Beyond separate subjects: Integrative learning at the middle level (pp. 25–38). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
3. Brazee, E., (1995). An integrated curriculum supports young adolescent development. In Y., Siu-Runyan & V., Faircloth (Eds.), Beyond separate subjects: Integrative learning at the middle level (pp. 5–24). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
4. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning Points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
5. Eccles, J. S., Midgely, C., Buchanan, C. M., Wigfield, A., Reuman, D., & Mac Ivor, D., (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage/environment fit. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.
6. Eccles, J. S., Lord, S. E., Roeser, R. W., Barber, B. L., & Jozefowicz, D. M. H., (1996). The association of school transitions in early adolescence with developmental trajectories through high school. In J., Schulenberg, J., Maggs, & K., Hurrelmann, (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence (pp. 283–320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C., (1989). Stage environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C., Ames & R., Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.
8. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A., (1997). Young adolescent development. In J. L., Irvin, (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 15–29). Columbus, Ohio: National Middle School Association.
9. Felner, R. D., Jackson, A. W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N., (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 528–532, 541–550.
10. George, P. S., Stevenson, C., Thomason, J., & Beane, J., (1992). The middle school and beyond. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Johnson, D. W., (1990). Reaching out: Interpersonal effectiveness and self-actualization (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P., (1991). Joining together (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Lipsitz, J., Mizell, M. H., Jackson, A. W., & Austin, L. M., (1997). Speaking with one voice: A manifesto for middle-grades reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 533–540.
14. McEwin, C. K., : Dickinson, T. S., (1995). The professional preparation of middle level teachers: Profiles of successful programs. Columbus, Ohio: National Middle School Association.
15. McEwin, C. K., Dickinson, T. S., & Jenkins, D. M., (1996). American middle schools: Practices and progress—A 25 year perspective. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
16. Mac Iver, D., & Reuman, D., (1988, April). Decision making in the classroom and early adolescents' valuing of mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.