Dynamic influences on a high-affinity, high-specificity interaction involving the C-terminal SH3 domain of p67phox

Biochemistry

Volumn 43, Issue 25, 2004, Pages 8094-8106

  Dutta, Kaushik ^a   Shi, Huanhuan ^b   Cruz Chu, Eduardo R ^b   Kami, Keiichiro ^c   Ghose, Ranajeet ^b,d  

^a NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER   (United States)

^b CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; ENZYMES; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

COMPLEX FORMATION; HOMOLOGY; LIGANDS; PEPTIDES;

BIOCHEMISTRY;

AMINO ACID; ISOLEUCINE; PHOSPHATASE; PROLINE; PROLINE ENRICHED PHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN P67; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; COMPLEX FORMATION; DYNAMICS; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; SRC HOMOLOGY 3 DOMAIN; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; TIME;

AMINO ACIDS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PHOSPHORIC MONOESTER HYDROLASES; PROLINE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3042569148     PISSN: 00062960     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bi030268d     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Morton, C. J., and Campbell, I. D. (1994) SH3 domains. Molecular "Velcro", Curr. Biol. 4, 615-617.
2. Mayer, B. J. (2001) SH3 domains: Complexity in moderation, J. Cell Sci. 114, 1253-1263.
3. Mayer, B., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Signaling through SH2 and SH3 domains, Trends Cell Biol. 3, 8-13.
4. Pawson, T. (1994) SH2 and SH3 domains in signal transduction, Adv. Cancer Res. 64, 87-110.
5. Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains, Cell 76, 933-945.
6. Lim, W. A., Richards, F. M., and Fox, R. O. (1994) Structural determinants of peptide-binding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains, Nature 372, 375-379.
7. csk, J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13217-13222.
8. Courtneidge, S. A., Fumagalli, S., Koegl, M., Superti-Furga, G., and Twamley-Stein, G. M. (1993) The Src family of protein tyrosine kinases: Regulation and functions, EMBO J. 57-64.
9. Williams, J. C., Wierenga, R. K., and Saraste, M. (1998) Insights into Src kinase functions: Structural comparisons, Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 179-184.
10. Ghose, R., Shekhtman, A., Goger, M. J., Ji, H., and Cowburn, D. (2001) A novel, specific interaction involving the Csk SH3 domain and its natural ligand, Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 998-1004.
11. phox, Grb2, and Pex13p, EMBO J. 21, 4268-4276.
12. Cesareni, G., Panni, S., Nardelli, G., and Castagnoli, L. (2002) Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains? FEBS Lett. 513, 38-44.
13. Wang, C., Pawley, N. H., and Nicholson, L. K. (2001) The role of backbone motions in ligand binding to the c-Src SH3 domain, J. Mol. Biol. 313, 873-887.
14. Ferreon, J. C., and Hilser, V. J. (2003) Ligand-induced changes in dynamics in the RT loop of the C-terminal SH3 domain of Sem-5 indicate cooperative conformational coupling, Protein Sci. 12, 982-996.
15. Kay, L. E., Muhandiram, D. R., Farrow, N. A., Aubin, Y., and Forman-Kay, J. D. (1996) Correlation between dynamics and high affinity binding in an SH2 domain interaction, Biochemistry 35, 361-368.
16. Vaughn, J. L., Feher, V. A., Bracken, C., and Cavanagh, J. (2001) The DNA-binding domain in the Bacillus subtilis transition-state regulator AbrB employs significant motion for promiscuous DNA recognition, J. Mol. Biol. 305, 429-439.
17. Palmer, A. G., III (2001) NMR probes of molecular dynamics: Overview and comparison with other techniques, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 129-155.
18. Loria, J. P., Rance, M., and Palmer, A. G. I. (1999) A relaxation-compensated Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence for characterizing chemical exchange by NMR spectroscopy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 2331-2332.
19. Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G. W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., and Bax, A. (1995) NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes, J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277-293.
20. Ghose, R., Fushman, D., and Cowburn, D. (2001) Determination of the rotational diffusion tensor of macromolecules in solution from NMR relaxation data with a combination of exact and approximate methods-Application to the determination of interdomain orientation in multidomain proteins, J. Magn. Reson. 149, 204-217.
21. Kneller, J. M., Lu, M., and Bracken, C. (2002) An effective method for the discrimination of motional anisotropy and chemical exchange, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 1852-1853.
22. Lipari, G., and Szabo, A. (1982) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 4546-4559.
23. 15N relaxation with monomer/dimer equilibration, J. Mol. Biol. 266, 173-194.
24. 15N NMR relaxation in proteins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 3055-3063.
25. Ishima, R., and Torchia, D. A. (1999) Estimating the time scale of chemical exchange of proteins from measurements of transverse relaxation rates in solution, J. Biomol. NMR 14, 369-372.
26. 2 CPMG measurements, J. Biomol. NMR 17, 231-237.
27. 1ρ relaxation outside of the fast exchange limit: An experimental study of a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme, J. Biomol. NMR 26, 39-48.
28. Larson, S. M., and Davidson, A. R. (2000) The identification of conserved interactions within the SH3 domain by alignment of sequences and structures, Protein Sci. 9, 2170-2180.
29. Grantcharova, V. P., and Baker, D. (1997) Folding dynamics of the Src SH3 domain, Biochemistry 36, 15685-15692.
30. Ma, B., Kumar, S., Tsai, C. J., and Nussinov, R. (1999) Folding funnels and binding mechanisms, Protein Eng. 12, 713-720.
31. Ma, B., Shatsky, M., Wolfson, H. J., and Nussinov, R. (2002) Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: A matter of pre-existing populations, Protein Sci. 11, 184-197.
32. 2D spin systems, J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B 110, 213-218.
33. 2H-enriched proteins in solution, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 6439-6448.
34. Majumdar, A., and Ghose, R. (2004) Probing slow backbone dynamics in proteins using TROSY-based experiments to detect cross-correlated time-modulation of isotropic chemical shifts, J. Biomol. NMR 28, 213-227.