Molecular features of odorants systematically influence slow temporal responses across clusters of coordinated antennal lobe units in the moth Manduca sexta

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 236-254

  Daly, Kevin C ^a   Wright, Geraldine A ^a   Smith, Brian H ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; KETONE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUCLIDIAN ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; LARVA; LEPIDOPTERA; MANDUCA SEXTA; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLOW TEMPORAL RESPONSE; SMELLING; SPIKE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FATTY ALCOHOLS; MANDUCA; REACTION TIME; SMELL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3042552334     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01132.2003     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abeles M. Quantification, smoothing, and confidence limits for single-units' histograms. J Neurosci Methods 5: 317-325, 1982.
2. Aertsen AM, Gerstein GL, Habib MK, and Palm G. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity." J Neurophysiol 61: 900-917, 1989.
3. Baker SN and Gerstein GL. Determination of response latency and its application to normalization of cross-correlation measures. Neural Comput 13: 1351-1377, 2001.
4. Bazhenov M, Stopfer M, Rabinovich M, Huerta R, Abarbanel HD, Sejnowski TJ, and Laurent G. Model of transient oscillatory synchronization in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron 30: 553-567, 2001.
5. Bell RA and Joachim EG. Techniques for rearing laboratory colonies of tobacco hornworms and pink bollworms. Ann Ent Soc Am 69: 365-372, 1976.
6. Bhalerao S, Sen A, Stocker R, and Rodrigues V. Olfactory neurons expressing identified receptor genes project to subsets of glomeruli within the antennal lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurobiol 54: 577-592, 2003.
7. Brody CD. Slow covariations in neuronal resting potentials can lead to artefactually fast cross-correlations in their spike trains. J Neurophysiol 80: 3345-3351, 1998.
8. Brody CD. Correlations without synchrony Neural Comput 11: 1537-1551, 1999.
9. Buck L and Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65: 175-187, 1991.
10. Chapin JK and Nicolelis MA. Principal component analysis of neuronal ensemble activity reveals multidimensional somatosensory representations. J Neurosci Methods 94: 121-140, 1999.
11. Christensen TA and Hildebrand JG. Frequency coding by central olfactory neurons in the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. Chem Senses 13: 123-130, 1988.
12. Christensen TA and Hildebrand JG. Coincident stimulation with pheromone components improves temporal pattern resolution in central olfactory neurons. J Neurophysiol 77: 775-781, 1997.
13. Christensen TA, Lei H, and Hildebrand JG. Coordination of central odor representations through transient, non-oscillatory synchronization of glomerular output neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100: 11076-11081, 2003.
14. Christensen TA, Pawowski VM, Lei H, and Hildebrand JG. Multi-unit recordings reveal context-dependent modulation of synchrony in odor-dependent neural ensembles. Nat Neurosci 3: 927-931, 2000.
15. Christensen TA, Waldrop BR, Harrow ID, and Hildebrand JG. Local interneurons and information processing in the olfactory glomeruli of the moth Manduca sexta. J Comp Physiol [A] 173: 385-399, 1993.
16. Christensen TA, Waldrop BR, and Hildebrand JG. Multitasking on the olfactory system: context-dependent responses to odours reveal dual GABA-regulated coding mechanisms in single olfactory projection neurons. J Neurosci 18: 5999-6008, 1998.
17. Christensen TA and White J. Representation of olfactory information in the brain. In: The Neurobiology of Taste and Smell; Second Edition, edited by Finger T E, Silver WL, and Restrepo D. NY: Wiley-Liss, 2000, p. 201-232.
18. Cleland TA, Morse A, Yue EL, and Linster C. Behavioral models of odor similarity. Behav Neurosci 116: 222-231, 2002.
19. Cohen J and Cohen P. Applied Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
20. Daly KC, Chandra S, Durtschi ML, and Smith BH. Generalization of olfactory-based conditioned response reveals unique but overlapping odor representations in the moth, Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 204: 3085-3095, 2001a.
21. Daly KC, Durtschi ML, and Smith BH. Olfactory based discrimination learning in Manduca sexta. J Insect Physiol 47: 375-384, 2001b.
22. Daly KC and Smith BH. Associative olfactory learning in the moth Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 203: 2025-2038, 2000.
23. Eaton JL. Morphology of the head and thorax of the adult tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). I. Skeleton muscles. Ann Ent Soc Am 64: 437-445, 1971.
24. Friedrich RW and Laurent G. Dynamic optimization of odor representations by slow temporal patterning of mitral cell activity. Science 291: 889-94, 2001.
25. Fine-Levy JB, Girardot MN, Derby CD, and Daniel PC. Differential associative conditioning and olfactory discrimination in the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. Behav Neural Biol 49: 315-331, 1988.
26. Firestein S. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413: 211-218, 2001.
27. Galizia CG, Sachse S, Rappert A, and Menzel R. The glomerular code for odor representation is species specific in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nat Neurosci 2: 473-487, 1999.
28. Goldberg SJ and Moulton DG. Olfactory bulb responses telemetered during an odor discrimination task in rats. Exp Neurol 96: 430-442, 1987.
29. Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
30. Gray CM, Maldonado PE, Wilson M, and McNaughton B. Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J Neurosci Methods 63: 43-54, 1995.
31. Harris KD, Henze DA, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, and Buzsaki G. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol. 84: 401-414, 2000.
32. Henze DA, Borhegyi Z, Csicsvari J, Mamiya A, Harris KD, and Buzsaki G. Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol 84: 390-400, 2000.
33. Hildebrand JG. Analysis of chemical signals by the nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 67-74, 1995.
34. Hildebrand JG. Olfactory control of behavior in moths: central processing of odor information and the functional significance of olfactory glomeruli. J Comp Physiol [A] 178: 5-19, 1996.
35. Hildebrand JG and Shepherd GM. Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu Rev Neurosci 20: 595-631, 1997.
36. Homberg U, Christensen TA, and Hildebrand JG. Structure and function of the deutocerebrum in insects. Annu Rev Ent 34: 477-501, 1989.
37. Johnson BA, Woo CC, and Leon M. Spatial coding of odorant features in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 393: 457-471, 1998.
38. Kashiwadani H, Sasaki YF, Uchida N, and Mori K. Synchronized oscillatory discharges of mitral/tufted cells with different molecular receptive ranges in the rabbit olfactory bulb. J NeuroPhysiol 82: 1786-1792, 1999.
39. Kjaer TW, Hertz JA, and Richmond BJ. Decoding cortical neuronal signals: network models, information estimation and spatial tuning. J Comput Neurosci 1: 109-139, 1994.
40. Koehl MA, Koseff JR, Crimaldi JP, McCay MG, Cooper T, Wiley MB, and Moore PA. Lobster sniffing: antennule design and hydrodynamic filtering of information in an odor plume. Science 294: 1948-1951, 2001.
41. Laska M, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Hubener F, and Saito S. Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic odorants as a function of oxygen moiety. Chem Senses 25: 189-197, 2000.
42. Laubach M, Shuler M, and Nicolelis MA. Independent component analyses for quantifying neuronal ensemble interactions. J Neurosci Methods 94: 141-154, 1999.
43. Laurent G. Dynamical representaion of odors by oscillating and evolving neural assemblies. Trends Neurosci 19: 489-496, 1996.
44. Laurent G. Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 884-895, 2002.
45. Laurent G and Davidowitz H. Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies. Science 265: 1872-1820, 1994.
46. Laurent G and Naraghi M. Odorant-induced oscillations in the mushroom bodies of the locust. J Neurosci 14: 2993-3004, 1994.
47. Laurent G, Stopfer M, Friedrich RW, Rabinovich M, Volkovskii A, and Di Abarbanel H. Odor encoding as an active dynamical process: experiments, computation, and theory. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 263-297, 2001.
48. Lei H, Christensen TA, and Hildebrand JG. Local inhibition modulates odor-evoked synchronization of glomerulus-specific output neurons. Nat Neurosci 5: 557-65, 2002.
49. Linster C, Johnson BA, Yue E, Morse A, Xu Z, Hingco EE, Choi Y, Choi M, Messiha A, and Leon M. Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers. J Neurosci 21: 9837-9843, 2001.
50. MacLeod K and Laurent G. Distinct mechanisms for synchronization and temporal patterning of odor-encoding neural assemblies. Science 274: 976-979, 1996.
51. Malnic B, Hirono J, Sato T, and Buck LB. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96: 713-723, 1999.
52. Matsumoto SG and Hildebrand JG. Olfactory mechanisms in the moth Manduca sexta: response characteristics and morphology of central neurons in the antennal lobes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 213: 249-277, 1981.
53. McClurkin JW, Optican LM, Richmond BJ, and Gawne TJ. Concurrent processing and complexity of temporally encoded neuronal messages in visual perception. Science 253: 675-677, 1991.
54. McNaughton BL, O'Keefe J, and Barnes CA. The stereotrode: a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records. J Neurosci Methods 8: 391-397, 1983.
55. Mombaerts P. Seven-transmembrane proteins as odorant and chemosensory receptors. Science 286: 707-711, 1999.
56. Mori K. Relation of chemical structure to specificity of response in olfactory glomeruli. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5: 467-474, 1995.
57. Müller D, Abel R, Brandt R, Zockler M, and Menzel R. Differential parallel processing of olfactory information in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. J Comp Physiol [A] 188: 359-370, 2002.
58. Musial PG, Baker SN, Gerstein GL, King EA, and Keating JG. Signal-to-noise ratio improvement in multiple electrode recording. J Neurosci Methods 115: 29-43, 2002.
59. Nicolelis MA and Chapin JK. Spatiotemporal structure of somatosensory responses of many-neuron ensembles in the rat ventral posterior medial nucleus of the thalamus. J Neurosci 14: 3511-3532, 1994.
60. Ressler KJ, Sullivan SL, and Buck LB. Information coding in the olfactory system: evidence for a stereotyped and highly organized epitope map in the olfactory bulb. Cell 79: 1245-1255, 1994.
61. Rubin BD and Katz LC. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 23: 499-511, 1999.
62. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 6 (4th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2001.
63. Sachse S, Rappert A, and Galizia GC. The spatial representation of chemical structures in the antennal lobe of honeybees: steps towards the olfactory code. Eu J Neurosci 11: 3970-3982, 1999.
64. Sachse S and Galizia CG. Role of inhibition for temporal and spatial odor representation in olfactory output neurons: a calcium imaging study. J Neurophysiol 87: 1106-1117, 2002.
65. Schmidt M and Ache BW. Processing of antennular input in the brain of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. I. Non-olfactory chemosensory and mechanosensory pathway of the lateral and median antennular neuropils. J Comp Physiol [A] 178: 579-604, 1996.
66. Schoppa NE and Westbrook GL. Glomerulus-specific synchronization of mitral cells in the olfactory bulb. Neuron 31: 639-651, 2001.
67. Schoppa NE and Westbrook GL. AMPA autoreceptors drive correlated spiking in olfactory bulb glomeruli. Nat Neurosci 5: 1194-1202, 2002.
68. Shepherd GM. A molecular vocabulary for olfaction. Ann NY Acad Sci 510: 98-103, 1987.
69. Shields VDC and Hildebrand JG. Responses of a population of antennal olfactory receptor cells in the female moth Manduca sexta to plant-associated volatile organic compounds. J Comp Physiol [A] 186: 1135-1151, 2001.
70. Shipley MT and Ennis M. Functional organization of the olfactory system. J Neurobiol 30: 123-176, 1996.
71. Slotnick BM, Bell GA, Panhuber H, and Laing DG. Detection and discrimination of propionic acid after removal of its 2-DG identified major focus in the olfactory bulb: a psychophysical analysis. Brain Res 762: 89-96, 1997.
72. Slotnick B and Bodyak N. Odor discrimination and odor quality perception in rats with disruption of connections between the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulbs. J Neurosci 22: 4205-4216, 2002.
73. Smith BH and Menzel R. An analysis of variability in the feeding motor program of the honey bee: the role of learning in releasing a modal action pattern. Ethol 82: 68-81, 1989.
74. Stopfer M, Bhagavan S, Smith BH, and Laurent G. Imparied odour discrimination on desynchronization of odor-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390: 70-74, 1997.
75. Stopfer M, Jayaraman V, and Laurent G. Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron 39: 991-1004, 2003.
76. Stopfer M and Laurent G. Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics. Nature 402: 664-668, 1999.
77. Uchida N and Mainen ZF. Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nat Neurosci 6: 1224-1229, 2003.
78. Uchida N, Takahashi YK, Tanifuji M, and Mori K. Odor maps in the mammalian olfactory bulb: domain organization and odorant structural features. Nat Neurosci 3: 1035-1043, 2000.
79. Vassar R, Chao SK, Sitcheran R, Nunez JM, Vosshall LB, and Axel R. Topographic organization of sensory projections to the olfactory bulb. Cell 79: 981-991, 1994.
80. Vickers NJ, Christensen TA, Baker TC, and Hildebrand JG. Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code. Nature 410: 466-470, 2001.
81. Vosshall LB, Wong AM, and Axel R. An olfactory sensory map in the fly brain. Cell 102: 147-159, 2000.
82. Wehr M and Laurent G. Odor encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies. Nature 384: 162-166, 1996.
83. Willis MA and Baker TC. Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behavior of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta. Physiol Ent 9: 341-358, 1984.
84. Wise PM and Cain WS. Latency and accuracy of discriminations of odor quality between binary mixtures and their components. Chem Senses 25: 247-265, 2000.