Learning of somatosensory representations for texture discrimination using a temporal coherence principle

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 223-238

  Hipp, Joerg ^a   Einhäuser, Wolfgang ^a,b   Conradt, Jörg ^a   König, Peter ^c  

^a Institute of Neuroinformatics Zurich   (Switzerland)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Slow feature analysis; Somatosensory; Temporal coherence; Vibrissal; Whisker

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULATION; TOUCH; VIBRISSA;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; RATS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TOUCH; VIBRISSAE;

EID: 30344481665     PISSN: 0954898X     EISSN: 13616536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09548980500361582     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR. 1985. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2:284-299
2. Andermann ML, Ritt J, Neimark MA, Moore CI. 2004. Neural correlates of vibrissa resonance; band-pass and somatotopic representation of high-frequency stimuli. Neuron 42:451-463.
3. Arabzadeh E, Petersen RS, Diamond ME. 2003. Encoding of whisker vibration by rat barrel cortex neurons: Implications for texture discrimination. J Neurosci 23:9146-9154.
4. Arabzadeh E, Panzeri S, Diamond ME. 2004. Whisker vibration information carried by rat barrel cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24:6011-6020.
5. Bishop M. 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Berkes P, Wiskott L. 2005. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. J Vis 5:579-602.
7. Brecht M, Preilowski B, Merzenich MM. 1997. Functional architecture of the mystacial vibrissae. Behav Brain Res 84:81-97.
8. Carvell GE, Simons DJ. 1990. Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat. J Neurosci 10:2638-2648.
9. Deschenes M, Timofeeva E, Lavallee P. 2003. The relay of high-frequency sensory signals in the whisker-to-barreloid pathway. J Neurosci 23:6778-6787.
10. Einhäuser W, Kayser C, König P, Körding KP. 2002. Learning the invariance properties of complex cells from their responses to natural stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 15:475-486.
11. Einhäuser W, Kayser C, Körding KP, König P. 2003. Learning distinct and complementary feature-selectivities from natural colour videos. Rev Neurosci 14:43-52.
12. Einhäuser W, Hipp J, Eggert J, Körner E, König P. 2005. Learning viewpoint invariant object representations using a temporal coherence principle. Biol Cybern 93:79-90.
13. Földiak P. 1991. Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Comput 3:194-200.
14. Gibson JM, Welker WI. 1983a. Quantitative studies of stimulus coding in first-order vibrissa afferents of rats. 1. Receptive field properties and threshold distributions. Somatosens Res 1:51-67.
15. Gibson JM, Welker WI. 1983b. Quantitative studies of stimulus coding in first-order vibrissa afferents of rats. 2. Adaptation and coding of stimulus parameters. Somatosens Res 1:95-117.
16. Guic-Robles E, Valdivieso C, Guajardo G. 1989. Rats can learn a roughness discrimination using only their vibrissal system. Behav Brain Res 31:285-289.
17. Hashimoto W. 2003. Quadratic forms in natural images. Network: Comput Neural Syst 14:765-88.
18. Harvey MA, Bermejo R, Zeigler. 2001. HP Discriminative whisking in the head-fixed rat: Optoelectronic monitoring during tactile detection and discrimination tasks. Somatosens Mot Res 18:211-222.
19. Hurri J, Hyvärinen A. 2003. Simple-cell-like receptive fields maximize temporal coherence in natural video. Neural Comput 15:663-691.
20. Kayser C, Einhäuser W, Dümmer O, König P, Körding KP. 2001. Extracting slow subspaces from natural videos leads to complex cells. In: Dorffner G, Bischoff H, Hornik K editors. Artificial neural networks - (ICANN) LNCS 2130, Springer-Verlag. pp 1075-1080.
21. Kayser C, Körding KP, König P. 2003. Learning the nonlinearity of neurons from natural visual stimuli. Neural Comput 15:1751-1759.
22. Kayser C, Körding KP, König P. 2004. Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:468-473.
23. Körding KP, König P. 2001. Neurons with two sites of synaptic integration learn invariant representations. Neural Comput 13:2823-2849.
24. Körding KP, Kayser C, Einhäuser W, König P. 2004. How are complex cell properties adapted to the statistics of natural stimuli? J Neurophysiol 91:206-212.
25. Krupa DJ, Matell MS, Brisben AJ, Oliveira LM, Nicolelis MA. 2001. Behavioral properties of the trigeminal somatosensory system in rats performing whisker-dependent tactile discriminations. J Neurosci 21:5752-5763.
26. Krupa DJ, Wiest MC, Shuler MG, Laubach M, Nicolelis MA. 2004. Layer-specific somatosensory cortical activation during active tactile discrimination. Science 304:1989-1992.
27. Metha SB, Kleinfeld D. 2004. Frisking the whiskers: Patterned sensory input in the Rat vibrissa system. Neuron 41:181-184.
28. Moore CI. 2004. Frequency-dependent processing in the vibrissa sensory system. J Neurophysiol 91:2390-2399.
29. Prigg T, Goldreich D, Carvell GE, Simons DJ. 2002. Texture discrimination and unit recordings in the rat whisker/barrel system. Physiol Behav 77:671-675.
30. Riedmiller M, Braun H. 1993. A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: The RPROP algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Francisco, CA.
31. Rolls ET, Milward T. 2000. A model of invariant object recognition in the visual system: Learning rules, activation functions, lateral inhibition, and information-based performance measures. Neural Comput 12:2547-2572.
32. Romo R, Salinas E. 2001. Touch and go: Decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:107-137.
33. Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Lemus L, Brody CD. 2002. Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:1217-1225.
34. Romo R, Salinas E. 2003. Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:203-218.
35. Salinas E, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Romo R. 2000. Periodicity and firing rate as candidate neural codes for the frequency of vibrotactile stimuli. J Neurosci 20:5503-515.
36. Shoykhet M, Doherty D, Simons DJ. 2000. Coding of deflection velocity and amplitude by whisker primary afferent neurons: Implications for higher level processing. Somatosens Mot Res 17:171-180.
37. Stone JV. 1996. Learning perceptually salient visual parameters using spatiotemporal smoothness constraints. Neural Comput 8:1463-1492.
38. Stringer SM, Rolls ET. 2002. Invariant object recognition in the visual system with novel views of 3D objects. Neural Comput 14:2585-2596.
39. Talbot WH, Darian-Smith I, Kornhuber HH, Mountcastle VB. 1968. The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol 31:301-334.
40. Wallis G. 1996. Using spatio-temporal correlations to learn invariant object recognition. Neural Networks 9:1513-1519.
41. Wallis G, Baddeley R. 1997. Optimal, unsupervised learning in invariant object recognition. Neural Comput 9:883-894.
42. Wallis G, Rolls ET. 1997. Invariant face and object recognition in the visual systems. Prog Neurobiol 51:167-194.
43. Wiskott L, Sejnowski T. 2002. Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Comput 14:715-770.
44. Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H. 1970. The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res 17:205-242.