Learning Perceptually Salient Visual Parameters Using Spatiotemporal Smoothness Constraints

Neural Computation

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 1463-1492

  Stone, James V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; VISION;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030265917     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.1996.8.7.1463     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barlow, H. 1972. Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1, 371-394.
2. Barrow, H. G., and Bray, A. J. 1992. A model of adaptive development of complex cortical cells. In Artificial Neural Networks II: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, I. Aleksander and J. Taylor, eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
3. Becker, S. 1992. Learning to categorize objects using temporal coherence. In Neural Information Processing Systems 4, J. E. Moody and R. Lippmann, eds., pp. 361-368. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
4. Becker, S. 1996. Mutual information maximization: Models of cortical self-organisation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 7(1), 7-31.
5. Becker, S., and Hinton, G. 1992. Self-organizing neural network that discovers surfaces in random-dot stereograms. Nature (London) 335, 161-163.
6. Bienstock, E., Cooper, L., and Munro, P. 1982. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: Orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2, 32-48.
7. Durbin, R., and Willshaw, D. 1987. An analogue approach to the travelling salesman problem using an elastic net method. Nature (London) 326(6114), 689-691.
8. Eglen, S., Stone, J., and Barrow, H. 1996. Learning Perceptual Invariances: A Spatial Model. Tech. Rep. 404, Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.
9. Foldiak, P. 1991. Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Comp. 3(2), 194-200.
10. Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
11. Heywood, C., and Cowey, A. 1992. The role the 'face-cell' area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkey. Phil. Transact. Royal Soc. London(B) 335, 31-38.
12. Hinton, G. 1989a. Connectionist learning procedures. Artif. Intell. 40(1-3), 185-234.
13. Hinton, G. 1989b. Unsupervised learning procedures. First Sun Annual Lecture. Manchester University, Audio tape recording.
14. Hopfield, J. 1984. Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 3088-3092.
15. Johansson, G. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 201-21.
16. Linsker, R. 1988. Self-organization in perceptual network. Computer 105-117.
17. Livingstone, M., and Hubel, D. 1988. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology and perception. Science 240, 740-749.
18. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. Freeman, New York.
19. Mitchison, G. 1991. Removing time variation with the anti-hebbian differential synapse. Neural Comp. 3, 312-320.
20. Nicolls, J., Martin, A., and Wallace, B. 1992. From Neuron to Brain. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
21. Oja, E. 1982. A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. J. Math. Biol. 15(3), 267-273.
22. Perrett, D., Harries, M., Mistlin, A., and Chitty, A. 1990. Three stages in the classification of body movements by visual neurons. In Images and Understanding: Thoughts about Images, Ideas about Understanding, H. Barlow, C. Blakemore and M. Weston-Smith, eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Phillips, W., Kay, J., and Smyth, D. 1995. The discovery of structure by multistream networks of local processors with contextual guidance. Network 6, 225-246.
24. Poggio, G., Motter, B., Squatrito, S., and Trotter, Y. 1985. Responses of neurons in visual cortex (v1 and v2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vis. Res. 25(3), 397-406.
25. Reza, F. 1961. Information Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
26. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., and Williams, R. 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature (London), 323, 533-536.
27. Schraudolph, N., and Sejnowski, T. 1991. Competitive anti-hebbian learning of invariants. NIPS4, 1017-1024.
28. Sejnowski, T. 1977. Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons. J. Math. Biol. 4(4), 303-321.
29. Stone, J. V. 1992. The optimal elastic net: Finding solutions to the travelling salesman problem. Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Neural Networks, 170-174.
30. Stone, J. V. 1995. Learning spatio-temporal invariances. In Neural Computation and Psychology Proceedings, L. S. Smith and P. J. B. Hancock, eds., pp. 75-85. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
31. Stone, J. V., and Bray, A. 1995. A learning rule for extracting spatio-temporal invariances. Network, 6(3), 1-8.
32. Stone, J. V., and Isard, S. 1995. Adaptive scale filtering: A general method for obtaining shape from texture. IEEE PAMI, 17(7), 713-718.
33. Sutton, R. 1988. Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Machine Learn. 3, 9-44.
34. Westheimer, G. 1994. The ferrier lecture, 1992. Seeing depth with two eyes: Stereopsis. Proc. Royal Soc. London B, 257, 205-214.
35. Williams, P. 1991. A Marquardt algorithm for choosing the step-size in back-propagation learning with conjugate gradients. Cognitive science research paper CSRP 229, University of Sussex.
36. Zemel, R., and Hinton, G. 1991. Discovering Viewpoint Invariant Relationships That Characterize Objects. Tech. Rep., Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto.