Optimization of fully coupled electrostatic-fluid-structure interaction problems

Computers and Structures

Volumn 83, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 221-233

  Raulli, Michael ^a   Maute, Kurt ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; Electro mechanics; Electroaeroelasticity; Electrostatic actuation; Multiphysics; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROSTATICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLUIDICS; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ELECTRO-MECHANICS; ELECTROAEROELASTICITY; ELECTROSTATIC ACTUATION; MULTIPHYSICS;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 30344472391     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Bathe KJ, Zhang H. Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions. Int J Num Meth Eng 2004;60(1):213-32.
2. Batina JT. Unsteady euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes. AIAA J 1990;28(9):1381-8.
3. Bourouina T, Grandchamp JP. Modeling micropumps with electrical equivalent networks. J Micromech Microeng 1996;6:398-404.
4. Cai X-C, Farhat C, Sarkis M. A minimum overlap restricted additive schwarz pre-conditioner and applications in 3D flow simulations. In: Cai X-C, Mandel J, Farhat C, editor. The tenth international conference on domain decomposition methods for partial differential equations. 1998.
5. Degand C, Farhat C. A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes. Cornput Struct 2002;80:305-16.
6. Farhat C, Degand C, Koobus B, Lesoinne M. Torsional springs for two-dimensional dynamic unstructured fluid meshes. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 1998;163:231-45.
7. Farhat C, Geuzaine P, Brown G. Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter. Comput Fluids 2003;32(1):3-29.
8. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, LeTallec P. Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 1998; 157: 95-114.
9. Felippa C, Park KC, Farhat C. Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2001; 190.
10. Furdui V, Kariuki J, Jed Harrison D. Microfabricated electrolysis pump system for isolating rare cells in blood. J Micromech Microeng 2003;13:164-70.
11. Ghattas O, Li X. Domain decomposition methods for sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear aeroelastic problem. Int J Computat Fluid Dyn 1998;11:113-30.
12. Gilbert JR, Ananthasuresh GK, Senturia SD. 3d modeling of contact problems and hysteresis in coupled electromechanics. In: The ninth annual international workshop on MEMS. San Diego, CA: February 11-15, 1996.
13. Giunta AA, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Progress towards using sensitivity derivatives in a high-fidelity aeroelastic analysis of a supersonic transport. In: AIAA 98-4763, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidiscipli nary analysis and optimization. St. Louis, MO: September 1998. p. 441-53.
14. Guruswamy GP. A review of numerical fluids/structures interface methods for computations using high-fidelity equations. Comput Struct 2002;80:31-41.
15. Hou GJ-W, Satyanarayana A. Analytical sensitivity analysis of a statical aeroelastic wing. In: AIAA 2000-4824, 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Long Beach, CA: September 6-8, 2000.
16. Hung E, Senturia S. Extending the travel range of analogtuned electrostatic actuators. J Microelectromech Syst 1999;8(4):497-505.
17. Imam MH. Three-dimensional shape optimization. Int J Num Meth Eng 1982;18:661-73.
18. Kim JY, Aluru NR, Tortorelli DA. Improved multi-level newton solvers for fully coupled smulti-physics problems. J Num Meth Eng 2003;58:463-80.
19. LeTallec P, Mouro J. Fluid-structure interaction with large structural displacements. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2001;190:3039-67.
20. Lund E, Moller H, Jakobsen LA. Shape design optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems with large displacements and turbulence. Multidis Struct Optim 2003;25(5-6):383-92.
21. Martins J, Alonso J. High-fidelity aero-structural design optimization of a supersonic business jet. In: Proceedings of 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, strucutral dynamics and materials conference. Denver, CO: April 22-25, 2002.
22. Maute K, Lesoinne M, Farhat C. Optimization of aeroelastic systems using coupled analytical sensitivities. In: AIAA 2000-0560, 38th aerospace science meeting and exhibit. Reno, NV: January 10-13, 2000.
23. Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C. Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems. AIAA J 2001;39(11): 2051-61.
24. Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C. Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three-dimensional non-linear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method. Int J Num Meth Eng 2003;56(6):911-33.
25. Meric RA. Coupled optimization in steady-state thermoelasticity. J Thermal Stresses 1985;8:333-47.
26. Meric RA. Material and load optimization of thermoelastic solids. Part I: Sensitivity analysis. Part II: Numerical results. J Thermal Stresses 1986;9:359-72. 373-88.
27. Michaleris P, Tortorelli DA, Vidal CA. Tangent operators anddesign sensitivity formulations for transient non-linear coupled problems with applications to elastoplasticity. Int J Num Meth Eng 1994;37:2471-99.
28. Michaleris P, Tortorelli DA, Vidal CA. Analysis and optimization of weakly coupled thermoelastoplastic systems with application to weldment design. Int J Num Meth Eng 1995;38:1259-85.
29. Møller H, Lund E. Shape sensitivity analysis of strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction problems. In: AIAA 2000-4823, 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Long Beach, CA: September 6-8, 2000.
30. Potsdam M, Guruswamy G. A parallel multiblock mesh movement scheme for complex aeroelastic applications. In: Proceedings of 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. Reno: Jan 8-11, 2001.
31. Ramm E, Bletzinger K-U, Reitinger R, Maute K. The challenge of structural optimization. In: Topping BHV, Papadrakakis M, editors. Advances in structural optimization. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp Press; 1994. p. 27-52.
32. Raulli M, Maute K. Symbolic geometric modeling and parameterization for multiphysics shape optimization. In: 9th AIAA/ISSMO conference on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. 2002.
33. Rugonyi S, Bathe K.J. On finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions. Comput Model Eng Sci 2001;2(2):195-212.
34. Samareh JA. A survey of shape parameterization techniques. In: Proceedings of the CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA langley international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. Williamsburg, VA: June 22-25, 1999.
35. Schittkowski K. NLPQL: A FORTRAN subroutine for solving constrained nonlinear programming problems. Ann Operat Res 1985;5:485-500.
36. Shaul D, Sumner T. Estimating accuracy of electrostatic finite element models. Commun Num Meth Eng 2004;20: 313-21.
37. Sheta E, Moses R, Huttsell L, Harrand V. Active control of f/a-18 vertical tail buffeting using piezoelectric actuators. In: Proceedings of 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, strucutral dynamics and materials conference. Norfolk, VA: April 7-10, 2003.
38. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems. AIAA J 1990;28:153-60.
39. Ye W, Mukherjee S. Optimal three-dimensional analysis and design of electrostatic comb drives using boundary element method. Int J Num Meth Eng 1999;45:175-94.
40. Yobas L, Huff M, Lisy F, Durand D. A novel bulk-micromachined electrostatic microvalve with a curved compliant structure applicable for a pneumatic tactile display. J Microelectromech Syst 2001; 10:187-96.