Associations of mammographic density with dietary factors in Japanese women

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 14, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2877-2880

  Nagata, Chisato ^a   Matsubara, Tomoko ^c   Fujita, Hiroshi ^a   Nagao, Yasuko ^a   Shibuya, Chiken ^b   Kashiki, Yoshitomo ^b,d   Shimizu, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Gihoku General Hospital   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA BUNRI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d ASAHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL MARKER; ISOFLAVONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; DIETARY FIBER; DIETARY INTAKE; ETHNIC GROUP; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTAKE; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIET; DIET RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 30344466086     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0160     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2003;230:29-41.
2. Matsubara T, Yamazaki D, Fujita H, Hara T, Iwase T, Endo T. An automated classification method for mammograms based on evaluation of fibroglandular breast tissue density. In: Yaffe MJ, editor. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Madison (Wisconsin): Medical Physics Publishing; 2000. p. 737-41.
3. Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer 2005;14;705-8.
4. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington: World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research; 1997. p. 252-87.
5. Brisson J, Verreault R, Morrison AS, Termina S, Meyer F. Diet, mammographic features of breast tissue and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:14-24.
6. Boyd NF, Greenberg C, Lockwood G, et al. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:488-96.
7. Knight JA, Martin LJ, Greenberg CV, et al. Macronutrient intake and change in mammographic density at menopause: results from a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:123-8.
8. Vachon CM, Kushi L, Cerhan JR, Kuni CC, Sellers TA. Association of diet and mammographic breast density in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:151-60.
9. Sala E, Warren R, Duffy S, Welch A, Luben R, Day N. High risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and diet: a case-control study. Br J Cancer 2000;83:121-6.
10. Shimizu H. The basic report on Takayama Study. Gifu (Japan). Department of Public Health, Gifu University School of Medicine; 1996.
11. Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:346-57.
12. Sasaki S, Kobayashi M, Tsugane S. Development of substituted fatty acid composition table for the use in nutritional epidemiologic studies for Japanese populations: its methodological backgrounds and the evaluation. J Epidemiol 1999;9:190-207.
13. Shimizu H, Ohwaki A, Kurisu Y, et al. Validity and reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for a cohort study in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1999;29:38-44.
14. Suzuki I, Kawakami N, Shimizu H. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for physical activity in epidemiological studies. J Epidemiol 1998;8:152-9.
15. Supplementary comment: J Epidemiol 2002;12:54.
16. Maskarinec G, Nagata C, Shimizu H, Kashiki Y. Comparison of mammographic densities and their determinants in women from Japan and Hawaii. Int J Cancer 2002;102:29-33.
17. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1629-38.
18. Ursin G, Astrahan MA, Salane M, et al. The detection of changes in mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:43-7.
19. Willett W. Implication of total energy intake for epidemiological analyses. In: Willett W, editor. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990. p. 245-71.
20. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT user's guide, ver. 6.04. Cary (North Carolina): SAS Institute, Inc.; 1989.
21. Wynder EL, Cohen LA, Muscat JE, Winters B, Dwyer JT, Blackburn GL. Breast cancer: weighing the evidence for a promoting role of dietary fat. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:766-75.
22. Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Adami H-O, et al. Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer-a pooled analysis. N Engl J Med 1996;334:356-61.
23. Maskarinec G, Meng L. An investigation of soy intake and mammographic characteristics in Hawaii. Breast Cancer Res 2001;3:134-41.
24. Maskarinec G, Takata Y, Franke AA, Williams AE, Murphy SP. A 2-year soy intervention in premenopausal women does not change mammographic densities. J Nutr 2004;134:3089-94.
25. Jain M, Howe GR, Johnson KC, Miller AB. Evaluation of a diet history questionnaire for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1980;111:212-9.
26. Block G. A review of validations of dietary assessment methods. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:492-505.
27. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Little L, et al. Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images. Eur J Cancer Prev 1996;5:319-27.