The senatorial courtesy game: Explaining the norm of informal vetoes in advice and consent nominations

Legislative Studies Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 193-217

  Jacobi, Tonja ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344451358     PISSN: 03629805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3162/036298005X201518     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baron, David, and John Ferejohn. 1989. "Bargaining in Legislatures." American Political Science Review 83: 1181-1206.
2. Binder, Sarah A. 2003. "Blues Slips Sink Ships: Institutionalizing Senatorial Courtesy." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
3. Binder, Sarah, and Forrest Maltzman. 2004. "The Limits of Senatorial Courtesy." Legislative Studies Quarterly 29: 5-22.
4. Chase, Harold W. 1977. Federal Judges: The Appointing Process. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Cole, Kenneth C. 1934. "Judicial Affairs: The Role of the Senate in the Confirmation of Judicial Nominees." American Political Science Review 28: 875-94.
6. Cole, Kenneth C. 1937. "Mr. Justice Black and 'Senatorial Courtesy'." American Political Science Review 31:1113-15.
7. Congressional Quarterly: Congress A to Z. 1988. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
8. Corwin, Edward S. 1939. "The President as Administrative Chief." Journal of Politics 1: 17-61.
9. Dean, John. 2001. "Selecting Federal Judges: The New, Less Partisan Plan." Findlaw June 8.
10. De Vesa v. Dorsey. 1993. 634 A.2d 493.
11. Ferejohn, John A., and Charles Shipan. 1990. "Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 1-43.
12. Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Harris, Joseph P. 1952. "The Courtesy of the Senate." Political Science Quarterly 67: 36-63.
14. Kligerman v. Lynch. 1966. 92 N.J. Super. 373.
15. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Martin, Robert J. 2000. "Reinforcing New Jersey's Bench: Power Tools for Remodeling Senatorial Courtesy and Refinishing Judicial Selection and Retention." Rutgers Law Review 53: 1-90.
17. Matthews, Donald. 1959. "The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness." American Political Science Review 53: 1064-89.
18. Moraski, Byron J., and Charles R. Shipan. 1999. "The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices." American Journal of Political Science 43: 1069-95.
19. Passaic County Bar Association v. Hughes. 1969. 260 A.2d 261.
20. Segal, Jeffrey A., Charles M. Cameron, and Albert D. Cover. 1992. "A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Nominations." American Journal of Political Science 36: 96-121.
21. Smith, Steven S. 1999. The American Congress. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Snyder, Susan K., and Barry R. Weingast. 2000. "The American System of Shared Powers: The President, Congress, and the NLRB." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16: 269-305.
23. Weingast, Barry R. 1979. "A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms." American Journal of Political Science 23: 245-62.
24. Weingast, Barry R., and Mark Moran. 1983. "Bureaucratic Discretion on Congressional Control: Regulatory Policy Making by the Federal Trade Commission." Journal of Political Economy 91: 765-800.