New approaches to enhance motor function of the upper limb in patients with hemiparesis

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 2-5

  Levin, Mindy F ^b   Musampa, Nadine K ^a   Henderson, Amy K ^b   Knaut, Luiz A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arm movement; Compensation; Recovery; Stroke; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARM MOVEMENT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NOTE; PLASTICITY; REHABILITATION; TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 30344440375     PISSN: 10137025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1013-7025(09)70052-1     Document Type: Note

References (35)

1. Khaw KT. Epidemiology of stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:333-8.
2. Kwakkel G, Kellen BJ, Wagennaar R. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy 1999;13:457-70.
3. Levin MF. Interjoint coordination during movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 1996;119:281-93.
4. Trombly CA. Observations of improvement of reaching in five subjects with left hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:40-5.
5. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 2000;123:940-53.
6. Roby-Brami A, Fuchs S, Mokhtari M, et al. Reaching and grasping strategies in hemiparetic patients. Motor Control 1997; 1:72-91.
7. Michaelsen SM, Levin MF. Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke. A controlled trial. Stroke 2004;35:1914-9.
8. Cirstea MC, Ptito A, Levin MF. Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Exp Brain Res 2003;152:476-88.
9. Saling M, Stelmach GE, Mescheriakov S, et al. Prehension with trunk assisted reaching. Behav Brain Res 1996;80:153-60.
10. Levin MF, Michaelsen S, Cirstea C, et al. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2002;143:171-80.
11. Ustinova KT, Goussev VM, Balasubramaniam R, et al. Disruption of co-ordination between arm, trunk and center of pressure displacement in patients with hemiparesis. Motor Control 2004;8:139-59.
12. Foley NC, Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, et al. The efficacy of stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003; 10:1-18.
13. Keith AR. Treatment strength in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:1298-304.
14. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30: 2369-75.
15. Taub E, Wolf S. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3:38-61.
16. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raashau HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394-8.
17. Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1613-8.
18. Schneiberg S, Lamarre C, Bibeau A, et al. Effect of constraint therapy on motor control of the arm in children with cerebral palsy. Conference on Cerebral Palsy: New Directions in Research and Practice, 2004, Montreal, Quebec. (Abstract)
19. Ada L, Canning C, Carr JH, et al. Task specific training of reaching and manipulation. In: Bennett KMB, Castiello U, eds. Insights into Reach and Grasp Movement. North Holland: Elsevier, 1994:239-65.
20. Levin MF. Should stereotypic movement synergies seen in hemiparetic patients be considered adaptive? Behav Brain Sci 1996b;19:79-80.
21. Michaelsen SM, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, et al. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2001;32:1875-83.
22. Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, et al. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2004;157:162-73.
23. Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke. Randomized Control Trial. Stroke. [In press]
24. Holden MK, Dyar T. Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurol Report 2002;26:62-71.
25. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, et al. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J NeuroEng Rehab 2004;1:11-8.
26. Knaut LA, Henderson AK, Levin ME. Virtual reality program for retraining the upper limb in stroke patients. Progress in Motor Control V, 2005, Penn State University, State College, Pennsylvania. (Abstract)
27. Stanton D, Foreman N, Wilson P. Uses of virtual reality in clinical training: developing the spatial skills of children with mobility impairments. In: Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Molinari E, eds. Virtual Environments in Clinical Psychology and Neuroscience: Methods and Techniques in Advanced Patient-Therapist Interaction. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1998:219-32.
28. Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, et al. Case report: virtual environment training improves motor performance in two stroke patients. Neurol Report 1999:23:57-67.
29. Holden MK, Dyar T, Callahan J, et al. Motor learning and generalization following virtual environment training in a patient with stroke. Neurol Report 2000;24:170-1.
30. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther 2002; 82:898-915.
31. Deutsch JE, Latonio J, Burdea GC, et al. Rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries using the Rutgers ankle haptic interface: three case reports. Eurohaptics 2001;1:11-6.
32. Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Burdea GC, et al. Haptics and virtual reality used to increase strength and improve function in chronic individuals post-stroke: two case reports. Neurol Report 2002;26:79-86.
33. Riess TJ. Gait and Parkinson's disease: a conceptual model for an augmented-reality based therapeutic device. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;58:200-8.
34. You SH, Jang SH, Kim YH, et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005; 36:1166-71.
35. Rizzo A. A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, New Jersey, 2003:1-2. (Abstract)