The appeal of African broadcast Web sites to African diasporas : A case study of the United Kingdom

Journal of Black Studies

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 334-352

  Ogunyemi, Olatunji ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audience preference; Content features; Diaspora; Interactivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 29744463341     PISSN: 00219347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021934704273914     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Abels, E. G., White, M. D., & Hahn, K. (1997). Identifying user-based criteria for web pages. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7, 252-262.
2. Benjamin, I. (1995). The Black press in Britain. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
3. Bucy, E. P. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 247-254.
4. Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Suk Park, J. (2000). From on-air to online world: Examining the content and structure of broadcast TV stations' Web sites. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 321-339.
5. Choi, Y. (2004). Study examines daily public journalism at six newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(2), 12-27.
6. Deans, J. (2002, May 20). Connecting with your audience. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://media.guardian.co.uk/raceinmedia/story/0,12016,716549,00. html
7. Greer, J., & Mensing, D. (2004). US news web sites better, but small papers still lag. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(2), 98-112.
8. Hunter, C. D. (1997). Uses and gratifications of the Web. Boston: Boston College. Retrieved from www.be.edu./bc_org/avp/cas/comm/WebUses.html
9. Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the uses of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38(1), 164-181.
10. Kaye, B. (1998). Uses and gratifications of the World Wide Web: From couch potato to Web potato. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 6, 21-40.
11. Kingston, P. (2004, October 5). Online, off course. The Guardian Media Supplement, p. 17.
12. Lacy, S., & Martin, H. J. (2004). Competition, circulation and advertising. Newspaper Research Journal. 25(1), 18-39.
13. Lin, C. A., & Jeffres, L. W. (2001). Comparing distinctions and similarities across Web sites of newspapers, radio stations and television stations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 555-573.
14. Maddox, L. M., Darshn, M., & Dubek, H. G. (1997). The role and effect of Web addresses in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 47-59.
15. Nel, D., van Niekerk, R., Berthon, J., & Davies, T. (1999). Going with the flow: Web sites and customer involvement. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9, 109-116.
16. Online cashes in at last. (2004, October 18). The Guardian Supplement, p. 12.
17. Out of Africa. (2004, October 9). The Economist, 373, 25-26.
18. Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2004). The state of the news media. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/
19. Ross, K., & Nightingale, V. (2003). Media and audiences: New perspectives. London: Open University Press.
20. Savoie, B. (1998). Summary of the Web activity of television stations. Retrieved from www.nab.org/Research/webhriefs/WebActiv.html
21. Siapra, E. (2004). From couch potatoes to cybernauts? The expanding notion of the audience on TV channels' Web sites. New Media and Society, 6(2), 155-172.
22. Sreberny, A. (1999). Include me in. Rethinking ethnicity on television: Audience and production perspectives (pp. 3-4). UK: Broadcasting Standards Commission.
23. Sundar, S. S. (1999). Exploring receivers' criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly; 76, 373-386.