Will the real meaning of affect please stand up?

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 101-108

  Sjöberg, Lennart ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PROBABILITY; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EMOTIONAL PROCESSES; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; POLICY IMPLICATIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 29744461428     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870500446068     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Cabanac, M. (2002) What is emotion?, Behavioural Processes, 60, pp. 69-83.
2. Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. and Sjöberg, L. (1990) Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, pp. 135-149.
3. Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (Eds) (1994) The Nature of Emotion. Fundamental Questions (New York: Oxford University Press).
4. Elster, J. (1983) Ulysses and the Siren (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Elster, J. (1999) Strong Feelings. Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
6. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P. and Johnson, S. M. (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, pp. 1-17.
7. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Policy Sciences, 9, pp. 127-152.
8. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
9. Ganzach, Y. (2001) Judging risk and return of financial assets, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, pp. 353-370.
10. Graham (2001) Technological danger without stigma: The case of automobile airbags, in: J. Flynn, P. Slovic & H. Kunreuther (Eds) Risk, Media, and Stigma. Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Ttechnology, pp. 241-256 (London: Earthscan).
11. Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A. and Fischhoff, B. (2003) Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment., Psychological Science, 14(2), pp. 144-150.
12. Lewis, M. and Haviland, J. (Eds) (1993) Handbook of Emotions (New York: Guilford Press).
13. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K. and Welch, N. (2001) Risk as feelings, Psychological Bulletin, 127, pp. 267-286.
14. Montgomery, H. (1989) From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making, in: H. Montgomery & O. Svenson (Eds) Process and Structure in Human Decision Making, pp. 23-50 (Chichester, UK: Wiley).
15. Passer, M. W. and Smith, R. E. (2001) Psychology: Frontiers and Applications (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.).
16. Rundmo, T. (2002) Associations between affect and risk perception, Journal of Risk Research, 5, pp. 119-135.
17. Rundmo, T. and Sjöberg, L. (1998) Risk perception by offshore oil personnel related to platform movements, Risk Analysis, 18, pp. 111-118.
18. Sjöberg, L. (1979) Strength of belief and risk, Policy Sciences, 11, pp. 39-57.
19. Sjöberg, L. (1980a) The risks of risk analysis, Acta Psychologica, 45, pp. 301-321.
20. Sjöberg, L. (1980b) Volitional problems in carrying through a difficult decision, Acta Psychologica, 45, pp. 123-132.
21. Sjöberg, L. (1992) Psychological reactions to a nuclear accident, in: J. Baarli (Ed.) Conference on The radiological and radiation protection problems in Nordic regions, Tromsö 21-22 November, 1991, pp. Paper 12 (Oslo: Nordic Society for Radiation Protection).
22. Sjöberg, L. (1996) Riskuppfattning och inställning till svenskt medlemskap i EU. (Risk Perception and Attitude to Swedish Membership in the EU) (Stockholm: Styrelsen för Psykologiskt Försvar).
23. Sjöberg, L. (1998) Worry and risk perception, Risk Analysis, 18, pp. 85-93.
24. Sjöberg, L. (1999a) Attitudes, opinions and values: models and dynamics, in: P. Juslin & H. Montgomery (Eds) Judgment and Decision Making: Neo-Brunswikian and Process-Tracing Approaches, pp. 219-242 (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).
25. Sjöberg, L. (1999b) Consequences of perceived risk: Demand for mitigation, Journal of Risk Research, 2, pp. 129-149.
26. Sjöberg, L. (2000a) Consequences matter, "risk" is marginal, Journal of Risk Research, 3, pp. 287-295.
27. Sjöberg, L. (2000b) Factors in risk perception, Risk Analysis, 20, pp. 1-11.
28. Sjöberg, L. (2001a) Political decisions and public risk perception, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 72, pp. 115-124.
29. Sjöberg, L. (2001b) Whose risk perception should influence decisions?, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 72, pp. 149-152.
30. Sjöberg, L. (2003) Risk perception, emotion, and policy: The case of nuclear technology, European Review, 11, pp. 109-128.
31. Sjöberg, L. (2005) The perceived risk of terrorism, Risk Management: An Internnational Journal, 7(1), pp. 43-61.
32. Sjöberg, L. and Biel, A. (1983) Mood and belief-value correlation, Acta Psychologica, 53, pp. 253-270.
33. Sjöberg, L. and Montgomery, H. (1999) Double denial in attitude formation, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, pp. 606-621.
34. Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of risk, Science, 236, pp. 280-285.
35. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1980) Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk, in: R. Schwing & J. Albers (Eds) Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?, pp. 181-214 (New York: Plenum).
36. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185, pp. 1124-1131.
37. Zajonc, R. B. (1998) Emotions, in: D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 591-632 (Boston: McGraw-Hill).