Consequence s of perceived risk: Demand for mitigation

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 129-149

  Sjöberg, Lennart ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001520201     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/136698799376899     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1991) Schemas in person perception. In Contributions to Information Integration Theory (edited by N. H. Anderson) pp. 57-103. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
2. Andreasen, A. R. (1991) Consumer behavior research and social policy. In Handbook of Consumer Behavior (edited by T. S. Robertson and H. H. Kassarjian) pp. 459-506. Englewood- Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Baird, B. N. R. (1986) Tolerance for environmental health risks: The influence of knowledge, benefits, voluntariness, and environmental attitudes, Risk Analysis 6, 425-35.
4. Cornish, D. B., and Clarke, R. V. (Eds) (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Derbaix, C. (1983) Perceived risk and risk relievers: an empirical investigation, Journal of Economic Psychology 3, 19-38.
6. Desaulniers, D. R. (1991) An examination of consequence probability as a determinant of precautionary intent. PhD, Rice University, Houston Texas.
7. Drottz-Sjoberg, B.-M. (1991) Non-expert Definitions of Risk and Risk Perception (RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No.3). Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.
8. Drottr-Sjoberg, B.-M. (1992) Risk Perception and Definitions of Risk (Working Paper No.92-05). Brussels: European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management.
9. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Policy Sciences 9, 127-52.
10. Fisher, A. and Sjoberg, L. (1990) Radon risks: people’s perceptions and reactions. In Environmental Radon: Occurrence, Control and Health Hazards (edited by S. K. Majumdar, R. F. Schmalz and E. W. Miller) pp. 398-411. Pittsburgh: Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
11. Gardner, G. T. and Gould, L. C. (1989) Public perceptions of the risk and benefits of technology, Risk A nalysis 9, 225-42.
12. Gardner, G. T. and Stern, P. C. (1996) Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Boston Allyn & Bacon.
13. Gottfredson, M. R. and Hirschi, T. (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford U niversity Press.
14. Gray, P. (1995) A critical analysis of the use of risk indicators in communication about risk. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting organized by the Society for Risk Analysis Europe, Stuttgart.
15. Karpowicz-Lazreg, C. and Mullet, E. (1993) Societal risks as seen by the French public, Risk Analysis 13, 253-8.
16. Kraus, N. N. and Slovic, P. (1988) Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: modeling individual and group perceptions within homogenous hazard domains, Risk Analysis 8, 435-55.
17. Kunreuter, H. (1976) Limited knowledge and insurance protection, Public Policy 24, 227-61.
18. Kunreuter, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkin, B. and Katz, N. (1977) Limited Knowledge and Insurance Protection:Implications for Natural Hazard Policy. New York: Wiley.
19. Nagin, D. S. and Paternoster, R. (1993) Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime, Law and Society Review 27, 467-96.
20. Otway, H. and Thomas, T. (1982) Reflections on risk perception and policy, Risk A nalysis 2, 69-82.
21. Ritov, I., Baron, J. and Hershey, J. C. (1993) Framing effects in the evaluation of multiple risk reduction, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6, 145-59.
22. Sjoberg, L. (1989) Radon Risks: Attitudes, Perceptions and Actions, No. EPA-230-04-89-049. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis.
23. Sjoberg, L. (1994) Perceived Risk vs Demand for Risk Reduction (RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No. 18). Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
24. Sjoberg, L. (1996a) Demand for risk reduction. Paper presented at Risk in a modern society: Lessons from Europe, organized by the Society for Risk Analysis - Europe, Guildford, Surrey.
25. Sjoberg, L. (1996b) Perceived competence and motivation in industry and government as factors in risk perception. Paper presented at The Bellingham International Conference on Social Trust in Risk Management organized by the Department of Psychology, Western University of Washington, Bellingham, WA.
26. Sjoberg, L. and Torell, G. (1993) The development of risk acceptance and moral valuation, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 34, 223-36.
27. Sjoberg, L. and Winroth, E. (1986) Risk, moral value of actions, and mood, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 27, 191-208.
28. Sjoberg, L., Kolarova, D., Rucai, A.-A., Bernstrom, M.-L. and Flygelholm, H. (1996) Risk Perception and Media Risk Reports in Bulgaria and Romania (RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No. 23). Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.
29. Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236, 280-5.
30. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Corrigan, B. and Combs, B. (1977) Preference for insuring against probable small losses: insurance implications, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 44, 237-58.
31. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1978) Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective, Accident Analysis and Prevention 10, 281-5.
32. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1982) Why study perception? Risk Analysis 2, 83-93.
33. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1985) Characterizing perceived risk. In Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology (edited by R. W. Kates, C. Hohenhemser and J. X. Kasperson) pp. 92-125. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34. Slovic, P., Kraus, N. N., Lappe, H., Letzel, H. and Maimfors, T. (1989) Risk perception of prescription drugs: Report on a survey in Sweden. In The Perception and Management of Drug Safety Risks (edited by B. Horisberger and R. Dinkel) pp. 90-11. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. Starr, C. (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk, Science 165, 1232-8.
36. von Winterfeldt, D., John, R. S. and Borcherding, K. (1981) Cognitive components of risk ratings, Risk Analysis 1, 277-87.
37. Young, S. M. Wogalter and Brelsford (1992) A framework for successful adoption and performance of Japanese manufacturing practices in the United States, A cademy of Management Review 17, 677-700.