Adaptation to the induced effect stimulus normalizes surface slant perception and recalibrates eye position signals for azimuth

Journal of Vision

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 808-822

  Liu, Baoxia ^a   Berends, Ellen M ^b   Schor, Clifton M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aftereffects; Binocular vision; Disparity; Eye position signals; Induced effect; Stereo slant adaptation; Stereopsis; VSR

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; AFTERIMAGE; CALIBRATION; CUES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 29544442207     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/5.10.5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams, W. J., Banks, M. S., & van Ee, R. (2001). Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4(11), 1063-1064.
2. Backus, B. T. (2002). Perceptual metamers in stereoscopic vision. In T. G. Dietterich, Becker & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Neural information processing systems (Vol. 14). Cambridge: MIT press.
3. Backus, B. T., Banks, M. S., van Ee, R., & Crowell, J. A. (1999). Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research, 39(6), 1143-1170.
4. Berends, E. M., & Erkelens, C. J. (2001). Adaptation to disparity but not to perceived depth. Vision Research, 41(7), 883-892.
5. Berends, E. M., Liu, B., & Schor, C. M. (2005). Stereoslant adaptation is high level and does not involve disparity coding. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 71-80, http://journalofvision.org/5/1/7/, doi:10.1167/5.1.7.
6. Berends, E. M., van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (2002). Vertical disparity can alter perceived direction. Perception, 31(11), 1323-1333.
7. Blakemore, C., & Julesz, B. (1971). Stereoscopic depth aftereffect produced without monocular cues. Science, 171, 286-288.
8. Domini, F., Adams, W., & Banks, M. S. (2001). 3D aftereffects are due to shape and not disparity adaptation. Vision Research, 41(21), 2733-2739.
9. Duke, P. A., & Wilcox, L. M. (2003). Adaptation to vertical disparity induced-depth: Implications for disparity processing. Vision Research, 43(2), 135-147.
10. Gibson, J. J. (1937). Adaptation with negative after-effect. Psychological Review, 44, 222-244.
11. Graham, M., & Rogers, B. (1982). Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion-parallax and stereoscopic information. Perception, 11(3), 247-262.
12. Howard, I. P., & Rogers. B. J. (1995) Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Mitchell, D. E., & Baker, A. G. (1973). Stereoscopic aftereffects: Evidence for disparity-specific neurons in the human visual system. Vision Research, 13, 2273-2288.
14. Ogle, K. N. (1938). Induced size effect: I. A new phenomenon in binocular space perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 20, 604-623.
15. Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1993, January 21) Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature, 361(6409), 253-255.
16. Snoeren, P. R., & Puts, M. J. H. (1997). Multiple parameter estimation in an adaptive psychometric method: MUEST, an extension of the QUEST method. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 431-439.
17. van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (1996). Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research, 36(1), 43-51.
18. Wallach, H. (1968) Informational discrepancy as a basis of perceptual adaptation. In Sanford J. Freeman (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (pp. 209-229). Homewood Illinois: Dorsey Press.